World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
35065
World Ranking
14881
National Ranking
7525

George Winokur publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Winokur sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 334 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

George Winokur D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George Winokur sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

George Winokur was affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their academic career was associated with this institution, contributing to the scientific community through research and scholarship.

Winokur's documented research contributions do not include specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues based on the available data.

There are no recorded main or subfields of study, nor are there documented main topics of work attributed to Winokur in the data provided. Similarly, there are no listed book publications or awards associated with their career in this dataset.

Given the absence of detailed bibliographic or topical information, the overview of Winokur's scientific profile is limited to their primary affiliation and the fact that they are deceased. This indicates the historical nature of their contributions rather than ongoing research activity.

Best Publications

  • Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research.

    John P. Feighner;Eli Robins;Samuel B. Guze;Robert A. Woodruff

  • The Family History Method Using Diagnostic Criteria: Reliability and Validity

    Nancy C. Andreasen;Jean Endicott;Robert L. Spitzer;George Winokur

  • Alcohol Problems in Adoptees Raised Apart From Alcoholic Biological Parents

    Donald W. Goodwin;Fini Schulsinger;Leif Hermansen;Samuel B. Guze

  • The family history method using diagnostic criteria

    N. C. Andreasen;Jean Endicott;R. L. Spitzer;George Winokur

  • Drinking problems in adopted and nonadopted sons of alcoholics

    Donald W. Goodwin;Fini Schulsinger;Niels Møller;Leif Hermansen

  • Morbidity risks of schizophrenia and affective disorders among first degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia, mania, depression and surgical conditions.

    Ming T. Tsuang;George Winokur;Raymond R. Crowe

  • The prediction of suicide: Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a multivariate model applied to suicide among 1906 patients with affective disorders.

    Rise B. Goldstein;Donald W. Black;Amelia Nasrallah;George Winokur

  • Mortality in depressed patients treated with electroconvulsive therapy and antidepressants.

    David Avery;George Winokur

  • Alcoholism: III. Diagnosis and Familial Psychiatric Illness in 259 Alcoholic Probands

    George Winokur;Theodore Reich;John Rimmer;Ferris n. Pitts

  • A Study of Normal Bereavement

    Paula Clayton;Lynn Desmarais;George Winokur

  • A study of alcoholism in half siblings.

    Marc A. Schuckit;Donald A. Goodwin;George Winokur

  • A Prospective Follow-up of Patients With Bipolar and Primary Unipolar Affective Disorder

    George Winokur;William Coryell;Martin Keller;Jean Endicott

  • Life history research in psychopathology

    Merrill Flagg Roff;David F. Ricks;Max Pollack

  • Depressive disease: a genetic study.

    George Winokur;Remi Cadoret;Joe Dorzab;Max Baker

  • Depression and panic attacks: the significance of overlap as reflected in follow-up and family study data.

    W. Coryell;J. Endicott;N. C. Andreasen;M. B. Keller

  • Criteria for Subtyping Schizophrenia: Clinical Differentiation of Hebephrenic and Paranoid Schizophrenia

    Ming T. Tsuang;George Winokur

  • Family history studies: V. The genetics of mania.

    Theodore Reich;Paula J. Clayton;George Winokur

  • Alcoholism in manic-depressive (bipolar) illness: familial illness, course of illness, and the primary-secondary distinction.

    Winokur G;Coryell W;Akiskal Hs;Maser Jd

  • The Iowa Record-Linkage Study: I. Suicides and Accidental Deaths Among Psychiatric Patients

    Donald W. Black;Giles Warrack;George Winokur

  • The efficacy of electroconvulsive therapy and antidepressants in depression.

    Avery D;Winokur G

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald W. Black
Donald W. Black University of Iowa
William Coryell
William Coryell University of Iowa
Raymond R. Crowe
Raymond R. Crowe University of Iowa
Ming T. Tsuang
Ming T. Tsuang University of California, San Diego
Martin B. Keller
Martin B. Keller Brown University
Jean Endicott
Jean Endicott Columbia University
Theodore Reich
Theodore Reich Washington University in St. Louis
Bruce Pfohl
Bruce Pfohl University of Iowa
Hagop S. Akiskal
Hagop S. Akiskal University of California, San Diego
Tadafumi Kato
Tadafumi Kato Juntendo University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in exploring alternative or complementary careers to medicine? The healthcare field offers a broad range of rewarding options through online study. For those passionate about preventive health, an online nutritionist degree provides specialized knowledge in dietetics and public health, preparing graduates to impact community wellness.

Prospective healthcare managers can advance with online mha programs cahme accredited, ensuring high-quality, accredited training in administration—vital for leading hospitals and healthcare organizations. Nurses looking to expand their scope can enroll in rn to bsn programs without clinicals, which offer flexible, coursework-focused pathways for RNs aiming to broaden their professional roles.

For those already holding a master’s in nursing, the shortest post master's dnp program options cater to busy professionals who want to reach the top of advanced practice in less time. Exploring these online programs helps aspiring healthcare professionals find educational routes that fit their goals and schedules, ultimately expanding their impact in today’s diverse medical landscape.

Best Scientists Citing George Winokur

Recently Published Articles