World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8433 7876 4508 4105 68 9210

Nathaniel M. Lambert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nathaniel M. Lambert between 2006 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nathaniel M. Lambert published across 19 years, from 2006 to 2024, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2013. 1 of the 71 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2013. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
2006 2024

71 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nathaniel M. Lambert: publications per year, 2006 to 2024
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 1
2008 2
2009 7
2010 12
2011 7
2012 11
2013 18
2014 3
2015 2
2016 5
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 71
Download as CSV

Nathaniel M. Lambert publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 68 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 68
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Nathaniel M. Lambert D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathaniel M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nathaniel M. Lambert is affiliated with Brigham Young University in the United States. Their academic career is positioned within this institution, signifying a research and teaching role likely associated with this university.

There are no recent papers listed for Nathaniel M. Lambert, nor records of frequent co-authors, publication venues, or book publications. This absence of specific publication or collaboration data limits detailed insight into their research output or partnerships.

No main fields of study, subfields, or main research topics are documented. Without information on these areas, a description of their expertise or specialization within academic science cannot be provided.

No awards have been recorded for Nathaniel M. Lambert, so there is no available information regarding formal recognition in their professional career.

Based on available data, Nathaniel M. Lambert is an active academic affiliated with a notable university but without publicly documented contributions in terms of publications, co-authorships, or recognized fields of study.

Best Publications

  • To Belong Is to Matter Sense of Belonging Enhances Meaning in Life

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Tyler F. Stillman;Joshua A. Hicks;Shanmukh Kamble

  • Alone and Without Purpose: Life Loses Meaning Following Social Exclusion.

    Tyler F. Stillman;Roy F. Baumeister;Nathaniel M. Lambert;A. Will Crescioni

  • Benefits of Expressing Gratitude Expressing Gratitude to a Partner Changes One’s View of the Relationship

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Margaret S. Clark;Jared Durtschi;Frank D. Fincham

  • A Prototype Analysis of Gratitude: Varieties of Gratitude Experiences

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Steven M. Graham;Frank D. Fincham

  • Gratitude and depressive symptoms: The role of positive reframing and positive emotion

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Frank D. Fincham;Tyler F. Stillman

  • How Religiosity Helps Couples Prevent, Resolve, and Overcome Marital Conflict*

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;David C. Dollahite

  • Expressing gratitude to a partner leads to more relationship maintenance behavior.

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Frank D. Fincham

  • Family as a salient source of meaning in young adulthood

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Tyler F. Stillman;Roy F. Baumeister;Frank D. Fincham

  • More gratitude, less materialism: The mediating role of life satisfaction.

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Frank D. Fincham;Tyler F. Stillman;Lukas R. Dean

  • So far away from one's partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity.

    C. Nathan DeWall;Nathaniel M. Lambert;Erica B. Slotter;Richard S. Pond Jr.

  • Personal Philosophy and Personnel Achievement: Belief in Free Will Predicts Better Job Performance

    Tyler F. Stillman;Roy F. Baumeister;Kathleen D. Vohs;Nathaniel M. Lambert

  • A boost of positive affect The perks of sharing positive experiences

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;A. Marlea Gwinn;Roy F. Baumeister;Amy Strachman

  • Emotion differentiation moderates aggressive tendencies in angry people: A daily diary analysis.

    Richard S. Pond Jr.;Todd B. Kashdan;C. Nathan DeWall;Antonina Savostyanova

  • A changed perspective: How gratitude can affect sense of coherence through positive reframing

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Steven M. Graham;Frank D. Fincham;Tyler F. Stillman

  • a love that Doesn't last: PornoGraPhy ConsumPtIon anD weakeneD CommItment to one's romantIC Partner

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Sesen Negash;Tyler F. Stillman;Spencer B. Olmstead

  • Can prayer increase gratitude

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;Frank D. Fincham;Scott R. Braithwaite;Steven M. Graham

  • The Threefold Cord: Marital Commitment in Religious Couples

    Nathaniel M. Lambert;David C. Dollahite

  • A Grateful Heart is a Nonviolent Heart: Cross-Sectional, Experience Sampling, Longitudinal, and Experimental Evidence

    C. Nathan DeWall;Nathaniel M. Lambert;Richard S. Pond;Todd B. Kashdan

  • The material and immaterial in conflict: Spirituality reduces conspicuous consumption

    Tyler F. Stillman;Frank D. Fincham;Kathleen D. Vohs;Nathaniel M. Lambert

  • Faith and unfaithfulness: Can praying for your partner reduce infidelity?

    Frank D. Fincham;Nathaniel M. Lambert;Steven R. H. Beach

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank D. Fincham
Frank D. Fincham Florida State University
C. Nathan DeWall
C. Nathan DeWall University of Kentucky
Roy F. Baumeister
Roy F. Baumeister University of Queensland
Steven R. H. Beach
Steven R. H. Beach University of Georgia
David C. Dollahite
David C. Dollahite Brigham Young University
Eli J. Finkel
Eli J. Finkel Northwestern University
Todd B. Kashdan
Todd B. Kashdan George Mason University
Kathleen D. Vohs
Kathleen D. Vohs University of Minnesota
Galen V. Bodenhausen
Galen V. Bodenhausen Northwestern University
John B. Nezlek
John B. Nezlek University of Social Sciences and Humanities

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology and related fields has become increasingly popular, especially for those seeking flexibility and accelerated pathways to a career. Many universities in the U.S. now offer the fastest online counseling master's programs in the United States, which are designed to accommodate busy schedules and allow students to complete their studies in less time.

If you reside in New York, you may be interested in the fastest online counseling degree programs ranking in New York, which compares top options for accelerated learning in the state. Similarly, students in Ohio can explore Ohio accelerated counseling degrees online, offering flexible formats and quick completion tracks.

For those considering careers or licensure in Texas, a range of Texas accelerated counseling programs online are available. These programs help students advance their qualifications efficiently, providing direct routes into growing fields like counseling, mental health services, and educational psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Nathaniel M. Lambert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles