World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
19817
World Ranking
17700
National Ranking
8836

Frank L. Hanley publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank L. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 410 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frank L. Hanley D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank L. Hanley sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank L. Hanley is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and specializes in medical research, particularly within the field of medicine with a focus on several subfields including epidemiology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and developmental neuroscience.

The primary topics covered in their research encompass:

  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Vascular Anomalies and Interventions
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Frank L. Hanley include:

  • Doff B. McElhinney
  • Richard D. Mainwaring
  • Michael Ma
  • Élisabeth Martin
  • Lynn F. Peng

Their publications have appeared predominantly in journals such as:

  • World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Pediatric Cardiology

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Hanley are:

  • "Mortality Prediction After Cardiac Surgery in Children: An STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database Analysis," 2022, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • "Surgical Repair of Peripheral Pulmonary Artery Stenosis in Patients Without Williams or Alagille Syndromes," 2020, Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • "Angiographic Anatomy of Major Aortopulmonary Collateral Arteries and Association With Early Surgical Outcomes in Tetralogy of Fallot," 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • "Reevaluating Congenital Heart Surgery Center Performance Using Operative Mortality," 2022, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • "Pulmonary Artery Reconstruction After Failed Pulmonary Artery Stents," 2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery

Best Publications

  • Postoperative Course and Hemodynamic Profile After the Arterial Switch Operation in Neonates and Infants A Comparison of Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Circulatory Arrest

    Gil Wernovsky;David Wypij;Richard A. Jonas;John E. Mayer

  • A Comparison of the Perioperative Neurologic Effects of Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest versus Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Infant Heart Surgery

    Jane W. Newburger;Richard A. Jonas;Gil Wernovsky;David Wypij

  • Improved Surgical Outcome After Fetal Diagnosis of Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome

    Wayne Tworetzky;Doff B. McElhinney;V. Mohan Reddy;Michael M. Brook

  • Outcomes in neonatal pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. A multiinstitutional study.

    F.L. Hanley;R.M. Sade;E.H. Blackstone;J.W. Kirklin

  • Effect of baffle fenestration on outcome of the modified Fontan operation.

    N D Bridges;J E Mayer;J E Lock;R A Jonas

  • Factors influencing early and late outcome of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries

    Gil Wernovsky;John E. Mayer;Richard A. Jonas;Frank L. Hanley

  • Midline one-stage complete unifocalization and repair of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect and major aortopulmonary collaterals.

    V.Mohan Reddy;John R. Liddicoat;Frank L. Hanley

  • Early and intermediate outcomes after repair of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect and major aortopulmonary collateral arteries: Experience with 85 patients

    V. Mohan Reddy;Doff B. McElhinney;Zahid Amin;Phillip Moore

  • Factors associated with marked reduction in mortality for Fontan operations in patients with single ventricle.

    John E. Mayer;Nancy D. Bridges;James E. Lock;Frank L. Hanley

  • Repair of truncus arteriosus in the neonate.

    Frank L. Hanley;Markus K. Heinemann;Richard A. Jonas;John E. Mayer

  • Electrical Resynchronization A Novel Therapy for the Failing Right Ventricle

    Anne M. Dubin;Jeffrey A. Feinstein;V. Mohan Reddy;Frank L. Hanley

  • Results of 102 cases of complete repair of congenital heart defects in patients weighing 700 to 2500 grams

    V.Mohan Reddy;Doff B. McElhinney;Theresa Sagrado;Andrew J. Parry

  • Surgical repair of complete atrioventricular canal defects in infancy. Twenty-year trends.

    Frank L. Hanley;Kathleen N. Fenton;Richard A. Jonas;John E. Mayer

  • Early results of the extracardiac conduit Fontan operation.

    Ed Petrossian;V.Mohan Reddy;Doff B. McElhinney;George P. Akkersdijk

  • In Utero Placement of Aortopulmonary Shunts A Model of Postnatal Pulmonary Hypertension With Increased Pulmonary Blood Flow in Lambs

    V. Mohan Reddy;Barbara Meyrick;Jackson Wong;Andras Khoor

  • Routine Primary Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot in Neonates and Infants Less Than Three Months of Age

    V. Mohan Reddy;John R. Liddicoat;Doff B. McElhinney;Michael M. Brook

  • Revision of previous Fontan connections to total extracardiac cavopulmonary anastomosis: A multicenter experience

    Carlo F. Marcelletti;Frank L. Hanley;Constantine Mavroudis;Doff B. McElhinney

  • Long-term follow-up of truncus arteriosus repaired in infancy: a twenty-year experience.

    Hiranya A. Rajasinghe;Doff B. McElhinney;V.Mohan Reddy;Bassem N. Mora

  • Echocardiographic diagnosis alone for the complete repair of major congenital heart defects

    Wayne Tworetzky;Doff B McElhinney;Michael M Brook;V Mohan Reddy

  • One-stage complete unifocalization in infants: When should the ventricular septal defect be closed?

    V.Mohan Reddy;Edwin Petrossian;Doff B. McElhinney;Phillip Moore

Frequent Co-Authors

Doff B. McElhinney
Doff B. McElhinney Stanford University
Norman H. Silverman
Norman H. Silverman University of California, San Francisco
Aldo R. Castaneda
Aldo R. Castaneda Boston Children's Hospital
John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
Richard A. Jonas
Richard A. Jonas Children’s National Health System
David L. Wessel
David L. Wessel George Washington University
Gil Wernovsky
Gil Wernovsky Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Edward D. Verrier
Edward D. Verrier University of Washington
James E. Lock
James E. Lock Stanford University
David Wypij
David Wypij Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online programs can open up new career options in the medical and healthcare fields. Numerous affordable and flexible degree paths are now available for those interested in healthcare but not pursuing traditional medical school.

For example, earning an online pharmacist degree can prepare students for high-demand pharmacy roles and offer a direct route into pharmaceutical care. Alternatively, those interested in the intersection of health and data can consider a health information management degree online and enter a rapidly evolving sector focused on healthcare records, compliance, and data management.

For individuals seeking administrative or technical roles, affordable medical billing and coding programs offer a fast route to job-ready skills and certification. Nursing continues to be vital in healthcare, and the cheapest fnp programs online help registered nurses advance to higher positions as family nurse practitioners, improving patient care and earning potential.

These online degrees and certifications provide flexible, accessible pathways for a wide range of healthcare careers without the need for traditional, lengthy medical training.

Best Scientists Citing Frank L. Hanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles