World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
68
Citations
18418
World Ranking
2735
National Ranking
1279

James M. Bower publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Bower sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 199 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James M. Bower D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James M. Bower sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James M. Bower is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio in the United States. Their research work spans several scientific areas, primarily focusing on Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Materials Science.

The main fields of study associated with their work include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Materials Science

Within these fields, the subfields they have contributed to are:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Materials Chemistry

Their research interests concentrate around a few key topics:

  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Biochemical and Molecular Research
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Among recent publications, the notable paper includes:

  • "Substrate Enolate Intermediate and Mimic Captured in the Active Site of Streptomyces coelicolor Methylmalonyl-CoA Epimerase", 2021, published in ChemBioChem

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • L.M. Stunkard
  • Aaron B. Benjamin
  • James Bower
  • Jeremy R. Lohman

The publication venue identified for their recent work is ChemBioChem.

Best Publications

  • The Book of GENESIS: Exploring Realistic Neural Models with the GEneral NEural SImulation System

    James M. Bower;David Beeman

  • Simulation of networks of spiking neurons: A review of tools and strategies

    Romain Brette;Michelle Rudolph;Ted Carnevale;Michael L. Hines

  • Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

    Mario Manto;James M. Bower;Adriana Bastos Conforto;José M. Delgado-García

  • Cerebellum implicated in sensory acquisition and discrimination rather than motor control

    Jia Hong Gao;Lawrence M. Parsons;James M. Bower;Jinhu Xiong

  • The Book of GENESIS

    James M. Bower;David Beeman

  • Acetylcholine and memory

    Michael E. Hasselmo;James M. Bower

  • An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell. I. Simulation of current clamps in slice.

    E. De Schutter;J. M. Bower

  • Consensus Paper: The Role of the Cerebellum in Perceptual Processes

    Oliver Baumann;Ronald J. Borra;Ronald J. Borra;James M. Bower;Kathleen E. Cullen

  • Congruence of spatial organization of tactile projections to granule cell and Purkinje cell layers of cerebellar hemispheres of the albino rat: vertical organization of cerebellar cortex

    J. M. Bower;D. C. Woolston

  • Cholinergic suppression specific to intrinsic not afferent fiber synapses in rat piriform (olfactory) cortex.

    M. E. Hasselmo;J. M. Bower

  • Olfactory cortex: model circuit for study of associative memory?

    Lewis B. Haberly;Lewis B. Haberly;James M. Bower;James M. Bower

  • Multiple Purkinje Cell Recording in Rodent Cerebellar Cortex

    K. Sasaki;J. M. Bower;R. Llinas

  • Cortical oscillations and temporal interactions in a computer simulation of piriform cortex.

    M. Wilson;J. M. Bower

  • Control of sensory data acquisition

    James M. Bower

  • Cholinergic modulation of cortical associative memory function

    Michael E. Hasselmo;Brooke P. Anderson;James M. Bower

  • An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell II. Simulation of synaptic responses

    E. De Schutter;J. M. Bower

  • Cerebellum and auditory function: an ALE meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.

    Augusto Petacchi;Angela R. Laird;Peter T. Fox;James M. Bower;James M. Bower

  • Exploring parameter space in detailed single neuron models: simulations of the mitral and granule cells of the olfactory bulb

    U. S. Bhalla;J. M. Bower

  • Brain maps and parallel computers.

    Mark E Nelson;James M Bower

  • Variability in tactile projection patterns to cerebellar folia crus IIA of the Norway rat.

    James M. Bower;Jeffrey Kassel

Frequent Co-Authors

Erik De Schutter
Erik De Schutter Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology
Lawrence M. Parsons
Lawrence M. Parsons University of Sheffield
Peter T. Fox
Peter T. Fox The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Dieter Jaeger
Dieter Jaeger Emory University
Michael E. Hasselmo
Michael E. Hasselmo Boston University
Jia-Hong Gao
Jia-Hong Gao Peking University
Lewis B. Haberly
Lewis B. Haberly University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jinhu Xiong
Jinhu Xiong University of Iowa
Gregory T. A. Kovacs
Gregory T. A. Kovacs SRI International

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James M. Bower

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles