World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
8403
World Ranking
6681
National Ranking
294

Michèle Studer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michèle Studer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michèle Studer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michèle Studer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michèle Studer is affiliated with Université Côte d'Azur in France and has a research focus spanning multiple areas within biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience. Their work contributes to understanding gene regulation, neural dynamics, and developmental processes at molecular and cellular levels.

Their main fields of study include Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology with 44 publications, and Neuroscience with 28 publications. Specific subfields in which they are active include Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Developmental Neuroscience.

Research topics commonly addressed in their publications include RNA Research and Splicing, Neural dynamics and brain function, Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms, Pluripotent Stem Cells Research, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling, and RNA regulation and disease.

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Michèle Studer demonstrate a focus on neurodevelopmental and molecular aspects of brain function and disease:

  • NR2F1 regulates regional progenitor dynamics in the mouse neocortex and cortical gyrification in BBSOAS patients, 2020, The EMBO Journal
  • Structural and Functional Aspects of the Neurodevelopmental Gene NR2F1: From Animal Models to Human Pathology, 2021, Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
  • The Parkinson's-disease-associated mutation LRRK2-G2019S alters dopaminergic differentiation dynamics via NR2F1, 2021, Cell Reports
  • COUP-TFI/Nr2f1 Orchestrates Intrinsic Neuronal Activity during Development of the Somatosensory Cortex, 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • Pathophysiological Heterogeneity of the BBSOA Neurodevelopmental Syndrome, 2022, Cells

Michèle Studer frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Michele Bertacchi, Chiara Tocco, Gwendoline Maharaux, Agnès Loubat, and Sara Mercurio, showing ongoing scientific partnerships across various projects.

The scientist's work is regularly published in well-established venues, with multiple papers appearing in outlets such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Neurobiology of Disease, Disease Models & Mechanisms, BIO-PROTOCOL, and Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

Best Publications

  • Altered segmental identity and abnormal migration of motor neurons in mice lacking Hoxb-1

    Michéle Studer;Andrew Lumsden;Linda Ariza-McNaughton;Allan Bradley

  • Oral-facial-digital type I protein is required for primary cilia formation and left-right axis specification.

    Maria Immacolata Ferrante;Alessandro Zullo;Adriano Barra;Sabrina Bimonte

  • Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch

    A. Gavalas;M. Studer;A. Lumsden;F.M. Rijli

  • Genetic interactions between Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 reveal new roles in regulation of early hindbrain patterning

    Michèle Studer;Anthony Gavalas;Heather Marshall;Linda Ariza-McNaughton

  • Role of a conserved retinoic acid response element in rhombomere restriction of Hoxb-1

    Michèle Studer;Heike Pöpperl;Heather Marshall;Atsushi Kuroiwa

  • The nuclear hormone receptor Coup-TFII is required for the initiation and early maintenance of Prox1 expression in lymphatic endothelial cells

    R. Sathish Srinivasan;Xin Geng;Ying Yang;Yingdi Wang

  • COUP-TFI regulates the balance of cortical patterning between frontal/motor and sensory areas.

    Maria Armentano;Shen-Ju Chou;Giulio Srubek Tomassy;Axel Leingärtner

  • Excitatory Projection Neuron Subtypes Control the Distribution of Local Inhibitory Interneurons in the Cerebral Cortex

    Simona Lodato;Caroline Rouaux;Kathleen B. Quast;Chanati Jantrachotechatchawan

  • Geniculocortical input drives genetic distinctions between primary and higher-order visual areas.

    Shen Ju Chou;Zoila Babot;Axel Leingar̈tner;Michele Studer

  • Hox homeobox genes and regionalisation of the nervous system

    Robb Krumlauf;Heather Marshall;Michéle Studer;Stefan Nonchev

  • Rapid Conversion of Fibroblasts into Functional Forebrain GABAergic Interneurons by Direct Genetic Reprogramming.

    Gaia Colasante;Gabriele Lignani;Alicia Rubio;Lucian Medrihan

  • COUP-TFI Coordinates Cortical Patterning, Neurogenesis, and Laminar Fate and Modulates MAPK/ERK, AKT, and ß-Catenin Signaling

    Andrea Faedo;Giulio Srubek Tomassy;Youlin Ruan;Hannah Teichmann

  • Area-specific temporal control of corticospinal motor neuron differentiation by COUP-TFI

    Giulio Srubek Tomassy;Elvira De Leonibus;Denis Jabaudon;Simona Lodato

  • Conditional Deletion of Hand2 Reveals Critical Functions in Neurogenesis and Cell Type-specific Gene Expression for Development of Neural Crest-derived Noradrenergic Sympathetic Ganglion Neurons

    Tyler J. Hendershot;Hongbin Liu;David E. Clouthier;Iain T. Shepherd

  • Expression of COUP-TFII Nuclear Receptor in Restricted GABAergic Neuronal Populations in the Adult Rat Hippocampus

    Pablo Fuentealba;Thomas Klausberger;Theofanis Karayannis;Wai Yee Suen

  • The COUP-TF nuclear receptors regulate cell migration in the mammalian basal forebrain.

    Marco Tripodi;Alessandro Filosa;Maria Armentano;Michèle Studer

  • Retinoids control anterior and dorsal properties in the developing forebrain

    Aida Halilagic;Vanessa Ribes;Norbert B. Ghyselinck;Maija H. Zile

  • COUP-TFI is required for the formation of commissural projections in the forebrain by regulating axonal growth

    Maria Armentano;Alessandro Filosa;Gennaro Andolfi;Michèle Studer

  • Reciprocal gene replacements reveal unique functions for Phox2 genes during neural differentiation.

    Eva Coppola;Alexandre Pattyn;Sarah C Guthrie;Christo Goridis

  • Loss of COUP-TFI Alters the Balance between Caudal Ganglionic Eminence- and Medial Ganglionic Eminence-Derived Cortical Interneurons and Results in Resistance to Epilepsy

    Simona Lodato;Giulio Srubek Tomassy;Elvira De Leonibus;Yoryani G Uzcategui

  • Assembly of the auditory circuitry by a Hox genetic network in the mouse brainstem.

    Maria Di Bonito;Maria Di Bonito;Yuichi Narita;Bice Avallone;Luigi Sequino

Frequent Co-Authors

Robb Krumlauf
Robb Krumlauf Stowers Institute for Medical Research
Joel C. Glover
Joel C. Glover University of Oslo
Andrew Lumsden
Andrew Lumsden King's College London
Luis Puelles
Luis Puelles University of Murcia
Paola Arlotta
Paola Arlotta Harvard University
François Guillemot
François Guillemot The Francis Crick Institute
Paola Bovolenta
Paola Bovolenta Spanish National Research Council
Denis Jabaudon
Denis Jabaudon University of Geneva
Carolina Frassoni
Carolina Frassoni Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Brunella Franco
Brunella Franco University of Naples Federico II

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens the door to a variety of related career options and educational pathways, especially with the rise of online learning. For students considering alternatives or complementary fields, exploring online certificate programs that pay well is a practical way to boost job prospects without committing to a lengthy degree.

If you are looking for a more accessible entry into higher education, there are also easy bachelor degrees online that can provide foundational knowledge and open up roles in allied health, psychology, or education.

For those interested in mental health or social services, pursuing graduate-level education is often essential. Options like the cheapest msw programs online enable students to earn a master’s in social work at an affordable cost, expanding opportunities in counseling or support services.

Additionally, students keen on behavior analysis or applied psychology can investigate bcba master's programs online. These programs prepare graduates for in-demand specialist careers focused on behavioral assessment and intervention.

Best Scientists Citing Michèle Studer

Trending Scientists