World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bob Löwenberg

Bob Löwenberg

Award Badge
Medicine
Netherlands
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 140 1665 1541 57 56 765 92374

Bob Löwenberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bob Löwenberg between 1975 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bob Löwenberg published across 51 years, from 1975 to 2025, averaging 18.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 88 publications in 2024. 108 of the 921 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 88. Peak 88 publications in 2024. 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 13 publications 1986: 18 publications 1987: 18 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 20 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 15 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 19 publications 1996: 23 publications 1997: 24 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 23 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 35 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 28 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 33 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 88 publications 2025: 20 publications
1975 2025

921 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bob Löwenberg: publications per year, 1975 to 2025
Year Publications
1975 2
1976 2
1977 3
1978 1
1979 2
1980 2
1981 2
1982 5
1983 5
1984 13
1985 13
1986 18
1987 18
1988 9
1989 13
1990 20
1991 9
1992 10
1993 15
1994 9
1995 19
1996 23
1997 24
1998 15
1999 14
2000 23
2001 20
2002 18
2003 19
2004 35
2005 24
2006 13
2007 28
2008 24
2009 33
2010 23
2011 27
2012 26
2013 31
2014 21
2015 18
2016 17
2017 18
2018 19
2019 15
2020 17
2021 16
2022 19
2023 43
2024 88
2025 20
Total 921
Download as CSV

Bob Löwenberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bob Löwenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 761–780 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 765 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228 765
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bob Löwenberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bob Löwenberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 140–141 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134 140
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Medicine in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 1996 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Bob Löwenberg is affiliated with Erasmus MC in the Netherlands and has a research focus heavily oriented toward hematology and molecular biology within the broader field of medicine. Their scholarly output includes a significant body of work centered on hematologic malignancies, particularly acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

Their publication record includes contributions to the understanding and management of AML and related disorders. Notable recent papers include:

  • Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN (2022, Blood)
  • International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data (2022, Blood)
  • Flotetuzumab as salvage immunotherapy for refractory acute myeloid leukemia (2020, Blood)
  • Towards precision medicine for AML (2021, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology)
  • Molecular characterization of mutant TP53 acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (2022, Blood)

Their frequent coauthors reflect a collaborative research approach with notable colleagues including:

  • Peter J.M. Valk
  • Gert J. Ossenkoppele
  • Markus G. Manz
  • Dimitri Breems
  • Jacqueline Cloos

Löwenberg's work has been published predominantly in journals specializing in hematologic research and oncology, with frequent venues such as:

  • Blood
  • Blood Advances
  • Leukemia
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • HemaSphere

Their main fields of study include medicine and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, with substantial contributions to subfields like hematology, molecular biology, genetics, immunology, and occupational health.

Specific research topics addressed by Löwenberg span:

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors

Throughout their career, Löwenberg received recognition such as election to the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1996.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel

    Hartmut Döhner;Elihu Estey;David Grimwade;Sergio Amadori

  • Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet.

    Hartmut Dohner;Elihu H. Estey;Sergio Amadori;Frederick R. Appelbaum

  • Revised Recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Bruce D. Cheson;John M. Bennett;Kenneth J. Kopecky;Thomas Büchner

  • Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation.

    Maria E. Figueroa;Omar Abdel-Wahab;Chao Lu;Patrick S. Ward

  • Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia

    Bruce D. Cheson;Peter L. Greenberg;John M. Bennett;Bob Lowenberg

  • Prognostically useful gene-expression profiles in acute myeloid leukemia.

    Peter J.M. Valk;Roel G.W. Verhaak;M. Antoinette Beijen;Claudia A.J. Erpelinck

  • Efficacy and Safety of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Patients With CD33-Positive Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse

    Eric L. Sievers;Richard A. Larson;Edward A. Stadtmauer;Elihu Estey

  • Management of acute promyelocytic leukemia: recommendations from an expert panel on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet

    Miguel A. Sanz;David Grimwade;Martin S. Tallman;Bob Lowenberg

  • Therapeutic Advances in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Alan Kenneth Burnett;M. Wetzler;B. Lowenberg

  • DNA Methylation Signatures Identify Biologically Distinct Subtypes in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Maria E. Figueroa;Sanne Lugthart;Yushan Li;Claudia Erpelinck-Verschueren

  • High-dose daunorubicin in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

    Bob Löwenberg;Gert J. Ossenkoppele;Wim van Putten;Harry C. Schouten

  • Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes

    B. D. Cheson;J. M. Bennett;Hagop M Kantarjian;A. Pinto

  • Mutations in nucleophosmin (NPM1) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): Association with other gene abnormalities and previously established gene expression signatures and their favorable prognostic significance

    Roel G. W. Verhaak;Chantal S. Goudswaard;Wim van Putten;Maarten A. Bijl

  • A 17-gene stemness score for rapid determination of risk in acute leukaemia

    Stanley W. K. Ng;Amanda Mitchell;James A. Kennedy;James A. Kennedy;James A. Kennedy;Weihsu C. Chen

  • Monosomal Karyotype in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Better Indicator of Poor Prognosis Than a Complex Karyotype

    Dimitri A. Breems;Wim L. J. Van Putten;Georgine E. De Greef;Shama L. Van Zelderen-Bhola

  • Double CEBPA mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations, define a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia with a distinctive gene expression profile that is uniquely associated with a favorable outcome

    Bas J. Wouters;Bob Löwenberg;Claudia A. J. Erpelinck-Verschueren;Wim L. J. van Putten

  • Molecular Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

    Mojca Jongen-Lavrencic;Tim Grob;Diana Hanekamp;François G Kavelaars

  • A Single Oncogenic Enhancer Rearrangement Causes Concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 Deregulation in Leukemia

    Stefan Gröschel;Stefan Gröschel;Mathijs A Sanders;Remco Hoogenboezem;Elzo de Wit

  • Prognostic Index for Adult Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Relapse

    Dimitri A. Breems;Wim L.J. Van Putten;Peter C. Huijgens;Gert J. Ossenkoppele

  • Results of a HOVON/SAKK donor versus no-donor analysis of myeloablative HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation in first remission acute myeloid leukemia in young and middle-aged adults: benefits for whom?

    Jan J. Cornelissen;Wim L. J. van Putten;Leo F. Verdonck;Matthias Theobald

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. M. Valk
Peter J. M. Valk Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ruud Delwel
Ruud Delwel Erasmus MC
Jan J. Cornelissen
Jan J. Cornelissen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pieter Sonneveld
Pieter Sonneveld Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ivo P. Touw
Ivo P. Touw Erasmus University Rotterdam
Miguel A. Sanz
Miguel A. Sanz University of Valencia
Edo Vellenga
Edo Vellenga University Medical Center Groningen
Gert J. Ossenkoppele
Gert J. Ossenkoppele University of Amsterdam
Hartmut Döhner
Hartmut Döhner University of Ulm

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine often involves exploring a range of educational and professional pathways beyond traditional medical schools. Many students choose alternative or supplementary degrees in healthcare, such as nursing, that offer flexibility and a variety of specializations.

Today, online programs are making advanced degrees more accessible and affordable. For those seeking the highest academic credentials, there are online phd programs nursing that combine research, leadership, and teaching roles in healthcare. Registered nurses looking to further their qualifications can benefit from the cheapest rn to bsn program online, expanding their knowledge while continuing to work.

Those without a nursing background also have opportunities through direct msn programs online, which are designed for non-nurses aiming to enter the field and gain advanced practice skills quickly. Furthermore, aspiring nurses can begin their careers with direct entry nursing programs, which tend to have more accessible admission requirements.

These online degree options offer flexible, cost-effective ways to build a rewarding career in healthcare—whether you are just starting out or seeking advanced roles.

Best Scientists Citing Bob Löwenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles