World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
16997
World Ranking
4508
National Ranking
2503

William M. Grove publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Grove sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William M. Grove D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Grove sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William M. Grove is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their academic profile predominantly centers around their institutional connection, with detailed publication records not currently listed.

No recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues have been explicitly documented for this researcher. Similarly, records of book publications, detailed fields and subfields of study, or main topics of research work are not available.

There is no information regarding awards received by William M. Grove, and the scientist is currently not reported as deceased, indicating ongoing potential for contributions to their field.

Best Publications

  • Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis.

    William M. Grove;David H. Zald;Boyd S. Lebow;Beth E. Snitz

  • Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.

    William M. Grove;Paul E. Meehl

  • Cognitive Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Depression: Singly and in Combination

    Steven D. Hollon;Robert J. DeRubeis;Robert J. DeRubeis;Mark D. Evans;Marlin J. Wiemer

  • Differential relapse following cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression.

    Mark D. Evans;Steven D. Hollon;Steven D. Hollon;Robert J. DeRubeis;Robert J. DeRubeis;Joan M. Piasecki;Joan M. Piasecki

  • Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis. Theory and practice.

    William M. Grove;Nancy C. Andreasen;Patricia McDonald-Scott;Martin B. Keller

  • How does cognitive therapy work? Cognitive change and symptom change in cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression

    Robert J. DeRubeis;Mark D. Evans;Steven D. Hollon;Michael J. Garvey

  • Ten-year follow-up of anorexia nervosa: clinical course and outcome

    Elke D Eckert;K. A. Halmi;K. A. Halmi;P. Marchi;P. Marchi;William M Grove

  • Simultaneous tests of many hypotheses in exploratory research

    William M. Grove;Nancy C. Andreasen

  • Heritability of Substance Abuse and Antisocial Behavior: A Study of Monozygotic Twins Reared Apart

    William M. Grove;Elke D. Eckert;Leonard Heston;Thomas J. Bouchard

  • Thought, Language, and Communication in Schizophrenia: Diagnosis and Prognosis

    Nancy C. Andreasen;William M. Grove

  • FOLLOW-UP AND FAMILY STUDY OF ANXIOUS DEPRESSION

    Paula J. Clayton;William M. Grove;William Coryell;Martin Keller

  • Development of alcoholism in adoptees raised apart from alcoholic biologic relatives.

    Remi J. Cadoret;Colleen A. Cain;William M. Grove

  • Familial prevalence and coaggregation of schizotypy indicators: a multitrait family study.

    William M. Grove;Boyd S. Lebow;Brett A. Clementz;Anna Cerri

  • Reliability of lifetime diagnosis. A multicenter collaborative perspective

    Nancy C. Andreasen;William M. Grove;Robert W. Shapiro;Martin B. Keller

  • Familial rates of affective disorder. A report from the National Institute of Mental Health Collaborative Study.

    Nancy C. Andreasen;John Rice;Jean Endicott;William Coryell

  • Saccadic disinhibition in patients with acute and remitted schizophrenia and their first-degree biological relatives.

    Clayton E. Curtis;Monica E. Calkins;William M. Grove;Kathleen J. Feil

  • The Cooccurrence of DSM-III-R Personality Disorders

    Scott Stuart;Bruce Pfohl;Marco Battaglia;Laura Bellodi

  • The iowa personality disorder screen : Development and preliminary validation of a brief screening interview

    Douglas R. Langbehn;Bruce M. Pfohl;Sarah Reynolds;Lee Anna Clark

  • Psychometric detection of schizotypy: perceptual aberration and physical anhedonia in relatives of schizophrenics.

    Brett A. Clementz;William M. Grove;Joanna Katsanis;William G. Iacono

  • Clinical versus mechanical prediction

    William M. Grove;David H. Zald;Boyd S. Lebow;Beth E. Snitz

  • Applications, Basics, and Computing of Exploratory Data Analysis

    William M. Grove

  • Cluster Analysis for Social Scientists

    William M. Grove

  • The Scientist Practitioner: Research and Accountability in Clinical and Educational Settings

    William M. Grove

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy C. Andreasen
Nancy C. Andreasen University of Iowa
William G. Iacono
William G. Iacono University of Minnesota
Howard N. Garb
Howard N. Garb United States Army Research Laboratory
William Coryell
William Coryell University of Iowa
Robert J. DeRubeis
Robert J. DeRubeis University of Pennsylvania
David H. Zald
David H. Zald Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Marco Battaglia
Marco Battaglia Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Monica E. Calkins
Monica E. Calkins University of Pennsylvania
Paul E. Meehl
Paul E. Meehl University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology opens doors to a wide array of career opportunities—and many of them can be pursued through flexible online degree programs. One rapidly growing field is speech-language pathology. Students interested in helping individuals overcome communication disorders can find clear pathways to certification in the USA.

Requirements can vary by state. For example, if you want to learn about Rhode Island slp certification requirements, you’ll need to consider specific coursework and supervised clinical practice. Those exploring South Carolina slp certification requirements will also find unique licensure steps and exam obligations.

If you are aiming for a license in the Midwest, familiarize yourself with South Dakota slp certification requirements. Meanwhile, those interested in the South should review the process for becoming a speech therapist in Tennessee—which includes a graduate degree and state licensure exam.

With many accredited online programs now available, students can find pathways that fit their schedule, making a rewarding career in psychology and related fields more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing William M. Grove

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles