World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eleanor J. Burke

Eleanor J. Burke

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 46 5960 5720 463 450 149 12550

Eleanor J. Burke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eleanor J. Burke between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eleanor J. Burke published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2017. 26 of the 244 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2017. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 33 publications 2025: 23 publications 2026: 3 publications
1997 2026

244 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eleanor J. Burke: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 2
1999 3
2000 3
2001 7
2002 3
2003 3
2004 2
2005 2
2006 3
2007 0
2008 2
2009 0
2010 4
2011 2
2012 3
2013 6
2014 3
2015 9
2016 8
2017 35
2018 14
2019 5
2020 11
2021 12
2022 15
2023 26
2024 33
2025 23
2026 3
Total 244
Download as CSV

Eleanor J. Burke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor J. Burke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 149 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 149
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Eleanor J. Burke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eleanor J. Burke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291 46
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Eleanor J. Burke is affiliated with the Met Office in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a particular focus on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change.

Their work covers several specialized subfields, including:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Environmental Chemistry

Burke's research topics include:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Climate variability and models
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research

Frequent co-authors contributing to their body of work include Sarah Chadburn, Chantelle Burton, Sebastian Westermann, Noah Smith, and Chris Jones.

Burke has published research in multiple venues, with the most common being:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Nature Climate Change
  • Biogeosciences
  • Environmental Research Letters

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Burke illustrate the breadth of their research interests and include the following:

  • "Historical Simulations With HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6," 2020, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • "Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change," 2020, The Cryosphere
  • "Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison," 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Soil moisture and hydrology projections of the permafrost region - a model intercomparison," 2020, The Cryosphere
  • "JULES-CN: a coupled terrestrial carbon-nitrogen scheme (JULES vn5.1)," 2021, Geoscientific Model Development

Best Publications

  • Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century

    Jemma Gornall;Richard Betts;Eleanor Burke;Robin Clark

  • UKESM1: Description and Evaluation of the U.K. Earth System Model

    Alistair A. Sellar;Colin G. Jones;Jane P. Mulcahy;Yongming Tang

  • Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics:a multi-model analysis

    Fortunat Joos;Fortunat Joos;Raphael Roth;Raphael Roth;J. S. Fuglestvedt;G. P. Peters

  • Climate policy implications of nonlinear decline of Arctic land permafrost and other cryosphere elements

    Dmitry Yumashev;Christopher Hope;Kevin Schaefer;Kathrin Riemann-Campe

  • Modeling the Recent Evolution of Global Drought and Projections for the Twenty-First Century with the Hadley Centre Climate Model

    Eleanor J. Burke;Simon J. Brown;Nikolaos Christidis

  • Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming - simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b)

    Katja Frieler;Stefan Lange;Franziska Piontek;Christopher P. O. Reyer

  • Dependence of the evolution of carbon dynamics in the northern permafrost region on the trajectory of climate change.

    A. David McGuire;David M. Lawrence;Charles Koven;Joy S. Clein

  • An observation-based constraint on permafrost loss as a function of global warming

    S. E. Chadburn;S. E. Chadburn;E. J. Burke;P. M. Cox;P. Friedlingstein

  • Land-use emissions play a critical role in land-based mitigation for Paris climate targets

    Anna B. Harper;Tom Powell;Peter M. Cox;Joanna House

  • Evaluating Uncertainties in the Projection of Future Drought

    Eleanor J. Burke;Simon J. Brown

  • Historical simulations with HadGEM3-GC3.1 for CMIP6

    Martin B. Andrews;Jeff K. Ridley;Richard A. Wood;Timothy Andrews

  • Reversibility in an Earth System model in response to CO 2 concentration changes

    O Boucher;P R Halloran;E J Burke;M Doutriaux-Boucher

  • A simplified, data-constrained approach to estimate the permafrost carbon-climate feedback

    C.D Koven;E.A.G. Schuur;C Schädel;T. J Bohn

  • Path-dependent reductions in CO2 emission budgets caused by permafrost carbon release

    T. Gasser;M. Kechiar;M. Kechiar;P Ciais;E.J. Burke

  • Evaluating permafrost physics in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) models and their sensitivity to climate change

    Eleanor J. Burke;Yu Zhang;Gerhard Krinner

  • Variability in the sensitivity among model simulations of permafrost and carbon dynamics in the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009

    A. David McGuire;Charles Koven;David M. Lawrence;Joy S. Clein

  • Scientific and Human Errors in a Snow Model Intercomparison

    Cecile B. Menard;Richard Essery;Gerhard Krinner;Gabriele Arduini

  • Soil moisture and hydrology projections of the permafrost region – a model intercomparison

    Christian G. Andresen;Christian G. Andresen;David M. Lawrence;Cathy J. Wilson;A. David McGuire

  • An extreme value analysis of UK drought and projections of change in the future

    Eleanor J. Burke;Richard H.J. Perry;Simon J. Brown

  • JULES-CN: a coupled terrestrial carbon–nitrogen scheme (JULES vn5.1)

    Andrew J. Wiltshire;Andrew J. Wiltshire;Eleanor J. Burke;Sarah E. Chadburn;Chris D. Jones

  • Uncertainties in the global temperature change caused by carbon release from permafrost thawing

    E. J. Burke;I. P. Hartley;C. D. Jones

  • A 16-year record (2002–2017) of permafrost, active-layer, and meteorological conditions at the Samoylov Island Arctic permafrost research site, Lena River delta, northern Siberia: an opportunity to validate remote-sensing data and land surface, snow, and permafrost models

    Julia Boike;Julia Boike;Jan Nitzbon;Jan Nitzbon;Jan Nitzbon;Katharina Anders;Mikhail N Grigoriev

Frequent Co-Authors

Sebastian Westermann
Sebastian Westermann University of Oslo
Ernst Hauber
Ernst Hauber German Aerospace Center
Gerhard Krinner
Gerhard Krinner Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Peter M. Cox
Peter M. Cox University of Exeter
Julia Boike
Julia Boike Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Shushi Peng
Shushi Peng Peking University
Charles D. Koven
Charles D. Koven Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Annette Rinke
Annette Rinke Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Gustaf Hugelius
Gustaf Hugelius Stockholm University
Pierre Friedlingstein
Pierre Friedlingstein University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring complementary online degrees can broaden career opportunities. A geology online degree offers a solid foundation in earth processes, which is essential for many environmental research and conservation roles.

Another valuable option is a geographic information systems degree, where students learn spatial analysis and mapping technologies vital for environmental planning and resource management.

For those interested in leadership or policy aspects, pursuing one of the easiest online mpa programs can provide essential skills in public administration, enabling graduates to influence environmental policies effectively.

Additionally, a online sociology degree bachelors can help students understand social dynamics and human behavior, which are key when addressing environmental justice and community engagement issues.

Choosing any of these related online degrees can enhance your expertise and open diverse pathways in the environmental field, from scientific research to policy and community advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Eleanor J. Burke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles