World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ruth Ann Marrie

Ruth Ann Marrie

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 97 9157 8598 362 344 612 41509

Ruth Ann Marrie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ruth Ann Marrie between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ruth Ann Marrie published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 25 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2021. 83 of the 651 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2021. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 54 publications 2018: 49 publications 2019: 57 publications 2020: 45 publications 2021: 66 publications 2022: 47 publications 2023: 59 publications 2024: 48 publications 2025: 35 publications
2000 2025

651 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ruth Ann Marrie: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 4
2007 5
2008 7
2009 9
2010 13
2011 9
2012 11
2013 31
2014 27
2015 25
2016 37
2017 54
2018 49
2019 57
2020 45
2021 66
2022 47
2023 59
2024 48
2025 35
Total 651
Download as CSV

Ruth Ann Marrie publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Ann Marrie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–620 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 612 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396 612
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ruth Ann Marrie D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth Ann Marrie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 97
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ruth Ann Marrie is affiliated with the University of Manitoba in Canada and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the domain of multiple sclerosis and related neurological conditions. Their scholarly output spans several decades, with a focus on epidemiology, pathology, neurology, psychiatry, and genetics within the broader field of medicine.

The scientist's research primarily addresses multiple sclerosis, as evidenced by numerous publications and topical studies. Key topics of their work include:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Microscopic Colitis

Main fields of study reflect a strong emphasis on Medicine with specialized subfields such as:

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Neurology
  • Genetics

Ruth Ann Marrie's frequent co-authors, indicating collaborative networks and cross-disciplinary contributions, include:

  • Çharles N. Bernstein
  • Helen Tremlett
  • John D. Fisk
  • Amber Salter
  • Scott B. Patten

Their research findings have appeared predominantly in journals with a neurological and clinical epidemiology focus. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  • Neurology
  • Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Gastroenterology

Selected recent papers authored by or involving Ruth Ann Marrie are:

  • "Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition", 2020, Multiple Sclerosis Journal
  • "Multiple sclerosis progression: time for a new mechanism-driven framework", 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • "Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores do not accurately estimate depression prevalence: individual participant data meta-analysis", 2020, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • "Population-Based Estimates for the Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States by Race, Ethnicity, Age, Sex, and Geographic Region", 2023, JAMA Neurology
  • "The 2013 clinical course descriptors for multiple sclerosis", 2020, Neurology

This body of work highlights a concentration on the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis, along with considerations on depression measurement and population health analytics related to neurological diseases.

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria

    Alan J. Thompson;Brenda L. Banwell;Frederik Barkhof;Frederik Barkhof;William M. Carroll

  • Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS, third edition.

    Clare Walton;Rachel King;Lindsay Rechtman;Wendy Kaye

  • The prevalence of MS in the United States: A population-based estimate using health claims data.

    Mitchell T. Wallin;William J. Culpepper;Jonathan D. Campbell;Lorene M. Nelson

  • Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls.

    Myla D. Goldman;Ruth Ann M Marrie;Jeffrey A Cohen

  • Incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Europe: a systematic review.

    Elaine Kingwell;James J Marriott;Nathalie Jetté;Tamara Pringsheim

  • The incidence and prevalence of psychiatric disorders in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review

    Ruth Ann M Marrie;Stephen Reingold;Jeffrey A Cohen;Olaf Stuve

  • Practice guideline recommendations summary: Disease-modifying therapies for adults with multiple sclerosis: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

    Alexander Rae-Grant;Gregory S. Day;Ruth Ann Marrie;Alejandro Rabinstein

  • Vascular comorbidity is associated with more rapid disability progression in multiple sclerosis

    Ruth Ann M Marrie;R. Rudick;R. Horwitz;G. Cutter

  • Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and in Combination With the PHQ-9 for Screening to Detect Major Depression: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Brooke Levis;Brooke Levis;Ying Sun;Chen He;Yin Wu;Yin Wu

  • A comparative study of the gut microbiota in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases—does a common dysbiosis exist?

    Jessica D. Forbes;Chih-yu Chen;Natalie C. Knox;Ruth-Ann Marrie

  • A systematic review of the incidence and prevalence of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: Overview

    Ruth Ann M Marrie;Jeffrey A Cohen;Olaf Stuve;Maria Trojano

  • Environmental risk factors in multiple sclerosis aetiology.

    Ruth Ann M Marrie

  • Clinical, environmental, and genetic determinants of multiple sclerosis in children with acute demyelination: a prospective national cohort study

    Brenda Banwell;Amit Bar-Or;Douglas L Arnold;Dessa Sadovnick

  • The rising prevalence and changing age distribution of multiple sclerosis in Manitoba

    R. A. Marrie;N. Yu;J. Blanchard;S. Leung

  • Clinical characteristics of African Americans vs Caucasian Americans with multiple sclerosis

    B. A.C. Cree;O. Khan;D. Bourdette;D. S. Goodin

  • Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables.

    Ruth Ann M Marrie;Neal V Dawson;Allan Garland

  • Comorbidity delays diagnosis and increases disability at diagnosis in MS

    R. A. Marrie;R. Horwitz;G. Cutter;T. Tyry

  • Incidence and Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis in the Americas: A Systematic Review

    Charity Evans;Sarah Gabrielle Beland;Sophie Kulaga;Christina Wolfson

  • The burden of mental comorbidity in multiple sclerosis: frequent, underdiagnosed, and undertreated

    RA Marrie;R Horwitz;G Cutter;T Tyry

  • Comorbidity, socioeconomic status and multiple sclerosis:

    RA Marrie;R Horwitz;G Cutter;T Tyry

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles N. Bernstein
Charles N. Bernstein University of Manitoba
Scott B. Patten
Scott B. Patten University of Calgary
Gary Cutter
Gary Cutter University of Alabama at Birmingham
Brenda Banwell
Brenda Banwell Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Jitender Sareen
Jitender Sareen University of Manitoba
Amit Bar-Or
Amit Bar-Or University of Pennsylvania
Renée El-Gabalawy
Renée El-Gabalawy University of Manitoba
Lisa M. Lix
Lisa M. Lix University of Manitoba
Douglas L. Arnold
Douglas L. Arnold Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Timothy Vollmer
Timothy Vollmer University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA can open the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways beyond traditional medical school. Many students consider advancing in the healthcare field through flexible and accelerated online degrees that cater to different professional interests and timelines.

For those interested in leadership, a healthcare administration accelerated degree is a popular option. These programs offer a fast-track to administrative roles in hospitals and clinics, equipping graduates with vital management skills.

Nursing professionals looking to expand their scope of practice can bridge undergraduate credentials to advanced practice through an adn to fnp program. These online bridge programs help registered nurses become family nurse practitioners quickly and efficiently.

Students interested in prevention, wellness, and public health often pursue nutrition degrees online. These programs are designed for flexibility and can lead to roles in dietetics, education, and community health.

For those aiming for executive-level healthcare positions, the best mha programs accredited by CAHME offer rigorous training in healthcare management and policy.

Best Scientists Citing Ruth Ann Marrie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles