World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
13512
World Ranking
13079
National Ranking
5577

Deanna L. Kroetz publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna L. Kroetz sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 207 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Deanna L. Kroetz D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Deanna L. Kroetz sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Deanna L. Kroetz is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily spans Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions focused on Oncology and Molecular Biology, alongside Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, and Cell Biology.

Their work covers topics including Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology, Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms, Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies, Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments, Microtubule and Mitosis Dynamics, Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment, and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Kroetz include:

  • Genomewide Meta-Analysis Validates a Role for S1PR1 in Microtubule Targeting Agent-Induced Sensory Peripheral Neuropathy, 2020, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Sensory Neurons are Sensitive to the Neurotoxic Effects of Paclitaxel, 2020, Clinical and Translational Science
  • New and Emerging Research on Solute Carrier and ATP Binding Cassette Transporters in Drug Discovery and Development: Outlook From the International Transporter Consortium, 2022, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • P-Glycoprotein Inhibition Exacerbates Paclitaxel Neurotoxicity in Neurons and Patients With Cancer, 2020, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • Role for Drug Transporters in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, 2020, Clinical and Translational Science

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Kroetz has worked extensively with Mark J. Ratain, Kouros Owzar, Tore Bjerregaard Stage, Katherina C. Chua, and Flora Mulkey.

Deanna L. Kroetz has published mostly in venues such as UNC Libraries, Clinical and Translational Science, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, and the British Journal of Cancer.

The research interests and publication record of Kroetz clearly align with advances in pharmacology and cancer treatment, with a particular focus on drug transporters, neurotoxicity of chemotherapy agents, and molecular mechanisms relating to cancer and molecular biology.

In recognition of their contributions to science, they were named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2017.

Best Publications

  • Targeted disruption of the alpha isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators.

    S S Lee;T Pineau;J Drago;E J Lee

  • Multidrug resistance polypeptide 1 (MDR1, ABCB1) variant 3435C>T affects mRNA stability.

    Danxin Wang;Andrew D Johnson;Audrey C Papp;Deanna L Kroetz

  • HUMAN LIVER CARBAMAZEPINE METABOLISM. ROLE OF CYP3A4 AND CYP2C8 IN 10, 11-EPOXIDE FORMATION

    Bradley M. Kerr;Kenneth E. Thummel;Colleen J. Wurden;Susan M. Klein

  • Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Regulates Hydrolysis of Vasoactive Epoxyeicosatrienoic Acids

    Zhigang Yu;Fengyun Xu;Linn M. Huse;Christophe Morisseau

  • Sequence diversity and haplotype structure in the human ABCB1 (MDR1, multidrug resistance transporter) gene.

    Deanna L. Kroetz;Christiane Pauli-Magnus;Laura M. Hodges;Conrad C. Huang

  • Very important pharmacogene summary: ABCB1 (MDR1, P-glycoprotein).

    Laura M. Hodges;Svetlana M. Markova;Leslie W. Chinn;Jason M. Gow

  • The pharmacogenetics research network: from SNP discovery to clinical drug response.

    K M Giacomini;C M Brett;R B Altman;N L Benowitz

  • Comprehensive Pharmacogenetic Analysis of Irinotecan Neutropenia and Pharmacokinetics

    Federico Innocenti;Deanna L. Kroetz;Erin Schuetz;M. Eileen Dolan

  • Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor α Controls the Hepatic CYP4A Induction Adaptive Response to Starvation and Diabetes *

    Deanna L. Kroetz;Philip Yook;Phillipe Costet;Pascale Bianchi

  • Natural variation in human membrane transporter genes reveals evolutionary and functional constraints

    Maya K. Leabman;Conrad C. Huang;Joseph DeYoung;Elaine J. Carlson

  • Cytochrome P450 pathways of arachidonic acid metabolism.

    Deanna L Kroetz;Darryl C Zeldin

  • Adherence-resistance relationships to combination HIV antiretroviral therapy

    David R. Bangsberg;Deanna L. Kroetz;Steven G. Deeks

  • A Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Novel Loci for Paclitaxel-Induced Sensory Peripheral Neuropathy in CALGB 40101

    R. Michael Baldwin;Kouros Owzar;Hitoshi Zembutsu;Aparna Chhibber

  • Irinotecan-induced diarrhea: functional significance of the polymorphic ABCC2 transporter protein.

    Fa de Jong;TJ Scott-Horton;DL Kroetz;HL McLeod

  • Evolutionary Conservation of Vertebrate Blood―Brain Barrier Chemoprotective Mechanisms in Drosophila

    Fahima Mayer;Nasima Mayer;Leslie Chinn;Robert L. Pinsonneault

  • REGULATION AND INHIBITION OF ARACHIDONIC ACID ω-HYDROXYLASES AND 20-HETE FORMATION

    Deanna L Kroetz;Fengyun Xu

  • Drug-metabolizing enzymes: evidence for clinical utility of pharmacogenomic tests.

    Tommy Andersson;David A. Flockhart;David B. Goldstein;Shiew Mei Huang

  • Amodiaquine metabolism is impaired by common polymorphisms in CYP2C8: implications for malaria treatment in Africa.

    Parikh S;Ouedraogo Jb;Goldstein Ja;Rosenthal Pj

  • Cytochrome P450 Eicosanoids are Activators of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor α

    Valerie Y. Ng;Yong Huang;L. Manmohan Reddy;John R. Falck

  • Genome-wide association studies in pharmacogenomics: successes and lessons

    Alison A. Motsinger-Reif;Eric Jorgenson;Mary V. Relling;Deanna L. Kroetz;Deanna L. Kroetz

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Ratain
Mark J. Ratain University of Chicago
Kathleen M. Giacomini
Kathleen M. Giacomini University of California, San Francisco
Howard L. McLeod
Howard L. McLeod Utah Tech University
Yusuke Nakamura
Yusuke Nakamura National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition
Thomas E. Ferrin
Thomas E. Ferrin University of California, San Francisco
Federico Innocenti
Federico Innocenti University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Hope S. Rugo
Hope S. Rugo University of California, San Francisco
Lawrence N. Shulman
Lawrence N. Shulman University of Pennsylvania
Ira Herskowitz
Ira Herskowitz University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens diverse career options, many of which now offer flexible online degree pathways. For those wishing to advance in healthcare or academia, there are specialized programs such as dnp program no clinical requirements, which appeal to working nurses who want to expand their credentials without the need for onsite clinicals.

Leveraging your background in biology, you might also consider a leadership route with one of the best online dha programs tailored for future healthcare administrators. Meanwhile, for those interested in pharmacology, pharm d online programs provide doctoral education that can be completed remotely—a growing trend for science professionals seeking advanced practice roles.

Biology and biochemistry graduates looking for alternative pathways may find opportunities in health and fitness. Specializations are now accessible through fitness degrees online, supporting careers in exercise science, wellness coaching, or sports nutrition. These related degrees reflect the evolving landscape of online science and healthcare education in the US.

Best Scientists Citing Deanna L. Kroetz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles