World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bertil Lindahl

Bertil Lindahl

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
77305
World Ranking
8095
National Ranking
161

Bertil Lindahl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bertil Lindahl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 559 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bertil Lindahl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bertil Lindahl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bertil Lindahl is affiliated with Uppsala University in Sweden and has an extensive research background primarily in the field of Medicine, with 350 publications. Within Medicine, their research focuses notably on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, with 192 publications, as well as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Statistics and Probability, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work covers several main topics, including Acute Myocardial Infarction Research, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Heart Failure Treatment and Management, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias, Cardiac Health and Mental Health, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life.

Frequent publication venues for Bertil Lindahl include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • PLoS ONE
  • Heart

They have co-authored extensively with a number of researchers, including:

  • Tomas Jernberg (59 publications)
  • David Erlinge (38 publications)
  • Kai M. Eggers (32 publications)
  • Tomasz Baron (27 publications)
  • Nicholas L. Mills (23 publications)

Among their recent papers are:

  • 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes, published in 2023 in the European Heart Journal
  • 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes, published in 2023 in the European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
  • Beta-Blockers after Myocardial Infarction and Preserved Ejection Fraction, published in 2024 in the New England Journal of Medicine
  • Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and statin intensity in myocardial infarction patients and major adverse outcomes: a Swedish nationwide cohort study, published in 2020 in the European Heart Journal
  • Survival in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis From the MINOCA Global Collaboration, published in 2021 in Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Best Publications

  • Third universal definition of myocardial infarction

    Kristian Thygesen;Joseph S. Alpert;Allan S. Jaffe;Maarten L. Simoons

  • European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Third Joint Task Force of European and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice.

    Guy De Backer;Ettore Ambrosioni;Knut Borch-Johnsen;Carlos Brotons

  • Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease.

    Bertil Lindahl;Henrik Toss;Agneta Siegbahn;Per Venge

  • Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: the Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Markku S. Nieminen;Silvia G. Priori;Maria Angeles Alonso Garcia;Andrzej Budaj

  • Guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The Task Force on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology.

    Nazzareno Galiè;Adam Torbicki;Robyn Barst;Philippe Dartevelle

  • ACC/AHA/ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Supraventricular Arrhythmias - Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Supraventricular Arrhythmias)

    Carina Blomström-Lundqvist;Melvin M. Scheinman;Etienne M. Aliot;Joseph S. Alpert

  • How to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in acute cardiac care

    Kristian Thygesen;Johannes Mair;Evangelos Giannitsis;Christian Mueller

  • Guidelines on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis executive summary; the task force on infective endocarditis of the European society of cardiology.

    Dieter Horstkotte;Ferenc Follath;Erno Gutschik;Maria Lengyel

  • Relation Between Troponin T and the Risk of Subsequent Cardiac Events in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease

    Bertil Lindahl;Per Venge;Lars Wallentin

  • N-Terminal Pro–Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Other Risk Markers for the Separate Prediction of Mortality and Subsequent Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Unstable Coronary Artery Disease A Global Utilization of Strategies To Open occluded arteries (GUSTO)-IV Substudy

    Stefan K. James;Bertil Lindahl;Agneta Siegbahn;Mats Stridsberg

  • Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care

    Kristian Thygesen;Johannes Mair;Hugo Katus;Mario Plebani

  • Prognostic Influence of Increased Fibrinogen and C-Reactive Protein Levels in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease

    Henrik Toss;Bertil Lindahl;A Siegbahn;Lars Wallentin

  • The Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART)

    Tomas Jernberg;Mona F Attebring;Kristina Hambraeus;Torbjorn Ivert

  • Management of grown up congenital heart disease.

    John Deanfield;Erik Thaulow;Carol Warnes;Gary Webb

  • N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide on admission for early risk stratification of patients with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation.

    Tomas Jernberg;Mats Stridsberg;Per Venge;Bertil Lindahl

  • Expert Consensus Document on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents The Task Force on the Use of Antiplatelet Agents in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease of the European Society of Cardiology

    C Patrono;F Bachmann;C Baigent;C Bode

  • Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with the low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin in the prehospital setting: the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS randomized trial in acute myocardial infarction.

    Lars Wallentin;P Goldstein;P W Armstrong;C B Granger

  • Prognostic Value of Growth-Differentiation Factor-15 in Patients With Non–ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

    Kai C. Wollert;Tibor Kempf;Timo Peter;Sylvia Olofsson

  • Troponin T Identifies Patients With Unstable Coronary Artery Disease Who Benefit From Long-Term Antithrombotic Protection

    Bertil Lindahl;Per Venge;Lars Wallentin

  • Troponin T Levels in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes, with or without Renal Dysfunction

    Ronnier J Aviles;Arman T Askari;Bertil Lindahl;Lars Wallentin

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Wallentin
Lars Wallentin Uppsala University
Per Venge
Per Venge Uppsala University
Stefan James
Stefan James Uppsala University
David Erlinge
David Erlinge Lund University
Agneta Siegbahn
Agneta Siegbahn Uppsala University
Christian Mueller
Christian Mueller University Hospital of Basel
Evangelos Giannitsis
Evangelos Giannitsis University Hospital Heidelberg
Lars Lind
Lars Lind Uppsala University
Allan S. Jaffe
Allan S. Jaffe Mayo Clinic
Mario Plebani
Mario Plebani University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

There are many flexible pathways into healthcare that don’t require a traditional on-campus experience. Students interested in supporting the medical field can start with an online medical billing and coding with financial aid program. These programs provide entry-level skills for administrative roles and are perfect for those seeking quick workforce entry with less debt.

For future nurses, it is important to know not every program requires standardized entrance exams. Applicants can explore do all nursing schools require the teas to identify schools with streamlined admissions. For those interested in the business side of healthcare, pursuing a healthcare administration online degree allows you to lead in clinical or hospital settings, often through accelerated, fully online courses.

Nurses looking to advance can join special bridge programs. The rn to np bridge programs offer a fast track for registered nurses to become nurse practitioners, opening up advanced practice opportunities in patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Bertil Lindahl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles