World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 44 7368 7152 291 277 86 18243

Manolis Savva publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Manolis Savva between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Manolis Savva published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2023. 24 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2023. 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 8 publications
2010 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Manolis Savva: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 1
2011 2
2012 2
2013 0
2014 6
2015 4
2016 3
2017 14
2018 7
2019 8
2020 10
2021 11
2022 6
2023 19
2024 16
2025 8
Total 117
Download as CSV

Manolis Savva publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manolis Savva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 82–91 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324 86
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Manolis Savva D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Manolis Savva sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 44
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Manolis Savva is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and has made significant contributions in the fields of computer science and engineering. Their research primarily focuses on computer vision and pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, computational mechanics, geology, and control and systems engineering.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics including multimodal machine learning applications, human pose and action recognition, 3D shape modeling and analysis, 3D surveying and cultural heritage, reinforcement learning in robotics, advanced neural network applications, and image processing and 3D reconstruction.

Manolis Savva has a number of frequently cited recent publications, including:

  • ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository, 2023, published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • ObjectNav Revisited: On Evaluation of Embodied Agents Navigating to Objects, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Rearrangement: A Challenge for Embodied AI, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • MultiON: Benchmarking Semantic Map Memory using Multi-Object Navigation, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Habitat-Matterport 3D Dataset (HM3D): 1000 Large-scale 3D Environments for Embodied AI, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Research collaborations are an important aspect of Savva's work. Frequent co-authors include Anne Lynn S. Chang, Dhruv Batra, Erik Wijmans, Hanxiao Jiang, and Ali Mahdavi-Amiri.

Publication venues where Manolis Savva has often published include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • AI Matters
  • 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

Best Publications

  • ScanNet: Richly-Annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenes

    Angela Dai;Angel X. Chang;Manolis Savva;Maciej Halber

  • ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository

    Angel X. Chang;Thomas A. Funkhouser;Leonidas J. Guibas;Pat Hanrahan

  • Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environments

    Angel Chang;Angela Dai;Thomas Funkhouser;Maciej Halber

  • Semantic Scene Completion from a Single Depth Image

    Shuran Song;Fisher Yu;Andy Zeng;Angel X. Chang

  • Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Research

    Manolis Savva;Jitendra Malik;Devi Parikh;Dhruv Batra

  • ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenes

    Angela Dai;Angel X. Chang;Manolis Savva;Maciej Halber

  • On Evaluation of Embodied Navigation Agents

    Peter Anderson;Angel X. Chang;Devendra Singh Chaplot;Alexey Dosovitskiy

  • Matterport3D: Learning from RGB-D Data in Indoor Environments

    Angel Chang;Angela Dai;Thomas Funkhouser;Maciej Halber

  • The Replica Dataset: A Digital Replica of Indoor Spaces.

    Julian Straub;Thomas Whelan;Lingni Ma;Yufan Chen

  • Example-based synthesis of 3D object arrangements

    Matthew Fisher;Daniel Ritchie;Manolis Savva;Thomas Funkhouser

  • Habitat: A Platform for Embodied AI Research

    Manolis Savva;Abhishek Kadian;Oleksandr Maksymets;Yili Zhao

  • ReVision: automated classification, analysis and redesign of chart images

    Manolis Savva;Nicholas Kong;Arti Chhajta;Li Fei-Fei

  • Physically-Based Rendering for Indoor Scene Understanding Using Convolutional Neural Networks

    Yinda Zhang;Shuran Song;Ersin Yumer;Manolis Savva

  • MINOS: Multimodal Indoor Simulator for Navigation in Complex Environments

    Manolis Savva;Angel X. Chang;Alexey Dosovitskiy;Thomas A. Funkhouser

  • DD-PPO: Learning Near-Perfect PointGoal Navigators from 2.5 Billion Frames

    Erik Wijmans;Abhishek Kadian;Ari Morcos;Stefan Lee

  • Scan2CAD: Learning CAD Model Alignment in RGB-D Scans

    Armen Avetisyan;Manuel Dahnert;Angela Dai;Manolis Savva

  • Characterizing structural relationships in scenes using graph kernels

    Matthew Fisher;Manolis Savva;Pat Hanrahan

  • Deep convolutional priors for indoor scene synthesis

    Kai Wang;Manolis Savva;Angel X. Chang;Daniel Ritchie

  • PlanIT: planning and instantiating indoor scenes with relation graph and spatial prior networks

    Kai Wang;Yu-An Lin;Ben Weissmann;Manolis Savva

  • Sim2Real Predictivity: Does Evaluation in Simulation Predict Real-World Performance?

    Abhishek Kadian;Joanne Truong;Aaron Gokaslan;Alexander Clegg

  • ObjectNav Revisited: On Evaluation of Embodied Agents Navigating to Objects.

    Dhruv Batra;Aaron Gokaslan;Aniruddha Kembhavi;Oleksandr Maksymets

  • Text2Shape: Generating Shapes from Natural Language by Learning Joint Embeddings.

    Kevin Chen;Christopher B. Choy;Manolis Savva;Angel X. Chang

Frequent Co-Authors

Angel X. Chang
Angel X. Chang Simon Fraser University
Thomas Funkhouser
Thomas Funkhouser Google (United States)
Dhruv Batra
Dhruv Batra Georgia Institute of Technology
Pat Hanrahan
Pat Hanrahan Stanford University
Shuran Song
Shuran Song Stanford University
Vladlen Koltun
Vladlen Koltun Apple (United States)
Christopher D. Manning
Christopher D. Manning Stanford University
Stefan Lee
Stefan Lee Oregon State University
Jitendra Malik
Jitendra Malik University of California, Berkeley
Matthew Fisher
Matthew Fisher Adobe Systems (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can widen your career prospects if you want to study Computer Science in the USA. Many students seek easy degrees to get online that pay well as a way to enter the tech industry quickly and affordably. These options can lead to lucrative roles in IT support, web development, and database management.

For those interested in cutting-edge technology, online degrees in AI provide in-demand skills that can open doors to exciting positions in data science, machine learning, and robotics. As automation and AI continue to expand, these credentials are increasingly valued by employers.

When planning your academic journey, it's wise to consider not only what's popular but also the best degrees for the future. Fields like cybersecurity, software engineering, and information systems offer strong long-term prospects.

If you’re seeking to advance your qualifications, you might explore easy masters degrees designed for working professionals. These flexible programs can help boost your expertise without interrupting your career.

Best Scientists Citing Manolis Savva

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles