World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
6208
World Ranking
8493
National Ranking
198

André Seznec publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where André Seznec sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 190 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

André Seznec D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where André Seznec sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Fellow For contributions to branch prediction and cache memory design.

Overview

André Seznec is affiliated with the French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation (INRIA) in France. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Hardware and Architecture, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Advanced Data Storage Technologies
  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Embedded Systems Design Techniques
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

Selected recent publications by André Seznec include:

  • "Understanding Cache Compression" (2021), published in ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
  • "SIMT-X" (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization
  • "Leveraging Value Equality Prediction for Value Speculation" (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Daniel Rodrigues Carvalho
  • Anita Tino
  • Caroline Collange
  • Kleovoulos Kalaitzidis

All their recent publications appear in the venue ACM Transactions on Architecture and Code Optimization, reflecting a concentration in this journal for disseminating their research findings.

In recognition of their contributions, André Seznec was awarded the status of ACM Fellow in 2016. The citation for this award noted their work on branch prediction and cache memory design.

Best Publications

  • A case for two-way skewed-associative caches

    André Seznec

  • A case for (partially) TAgged GEometric history length branch prediction.

    André Seznec;Pierre Michaud

  • Trading conflict and capacity aliasing in conditional branch predictors

    Pierre Michaud;André Seznec;Richard Uhlig

  • Design tradeoffs for the alpha EV8 conditional branch predictor

    André Seznec;Stephen Felix;Venkata Krishnan;Yiannakis Sazeides

  • Performance implications of single thread migration on a chip multi-core

    Theofanis Constantinou;Yiannakis Sazeides;Pierre Michaud;Damien Fetis

  • Decoupled sectored caches: conciliating low tag implementation cost

    A. Seznec

  • Choosing representative slices of program execution for microarchitecture simulations: a preliminary application to the data stream

    Thierry Lafage;André Seznec

  • Analysis of the O-GEometric History Length Branch Predictor

    Andre Seznec

  • Multiple-block ahead branch predictors

    André Seznec;Stéphan Jourdan;Pascal Sainrat;Pierre Michaud

  • Improving cache behavior of dynamically allocated data structures

    D. N. Truong;F. Bodin;A. Seznec

  • Data-flow prescheduling for large instruction windows in out-of-order processors

    P. Michaud;A. Seznec

  • A new case for the TAGE branch predictor

    Andre Seznec

  • Tarantula: a vector extension to the alpha architecture

    Roger Espasa;Federico Ardanaz;Joel Emer;Stephen Felix

  • The strict avalanche criterion randomness test

    Julio Cesar Hernandez Castro;José María Sierra;Andre Seznec;Antonio Izquierdo

  • Zero-content augmented caches

    Julien Dusser;Thomas Piquet;André Seznec

  • Practical and secure PCM systems by online detection of malicious write streams

    Moinuddin K. Qureshi;Andre Seznec;Luis A. Lastras;Michele M. Franceschini

  • Performance upper bound analysis and optimization of SGEMM on Fermi and Kepler GPUs

    Junjie Lai;Andre Seznec

  • Skewed-associative Caches

    André Seznec;François Bodin

  • The L-TAGE Branch Predictor.

    André Seznec

  • A 64-Kbytes ITTAGE indirect branch predictor

    André Seznec

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex Ramirez
Alex Ramirez Google (United States)
Per Stenström
Per Stenström Chalmers University of Technology
Michael F. P. O'Boyle
Michael F. P. O'Boyle University of Edinburgh
Rizos Sakellariou
Rizos Sakellariou University of Manchester
Stefanos Kaxiras
Stefanos Kaxiras Uppsala University
Richard Uhlig
Richard Uhlig Intel (United States)
Erik Hagersten
Erik Hagersten Uppsala University
Guang R. Gao
Guang R. Gao University of Delaware
Eduard Ayguadé
Eduard Ayguadé Barcelona Supercomputing Center
Wayne Luk
Wayne Luk Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens a range of flexible learning and career options online. Many students and professionals are increasingly interested in easy certifications to get online, which can quickly boost skills in coding, IT support, and network security—often leading to well-paid entry-level roles.

For those seeking to advance their careers faster, the shortest masters degree programs offer opportunities to gain an accredited qualification in as little as 12 months. These programs are designed for those looking to accelerate their pathway to in-demand tech positions.

If you are considering your long-term prospects, it’s worth exploring the best masters degree to get in technology fields. These degrees are highly valued by employers and can open doors to specialized roles in areas such as data science, software engineering, and artificial intelligence.

Not ready for a full bachelor’s or master’s program? You can start with associates degrees online, which are flexible and affordable while providing foundational knowledge and a solid stepping stone to higher education or entry-level jobs in tech.

Best Scientists Citing André Seznec

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles