World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 85 844 754 23 22 282 32246

Rogier Versteeg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rogier Versteeg between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rogier Versteeg published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 192 publications in 2023. 3 of the 500 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 192. Peak 192 publications in 2023. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 5 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 192 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

500 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rogier Versteeg: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 3
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 3
1994 7
1995 8
1996 10
1997 6
1998 1
1999 5
2000 3
2001 5
2002 4
2003 7
2004 4
2005 6
2006 6
2007 13
2008 6
2009 14
2010 20
2011 16
2012 27
2013 20
2014 15
2015 20
2016 16
2017 8
2018 12
2019 10
2020 5
2021 9
2022 6
2023 192
2024 2
2025 1
Total 500
Download as CSV

Rogier Versteeg publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rogier Versteeg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 277–286 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 282 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49 282
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Rogier Versteeg D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rogier Versteeg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48 85
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Rogier Versteeg is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has contributed significantly to the fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine. Their research primarily focuses on neuroblastoma and cancer biology, exploring molecular mechanisms, cellular phenotypes, and therapeutic targets.

Their publication record includes influential papers such as:

  • Super enhancers define regulatory subtypes and cell identity in neuroblastoma (2020, Nature Cancer)
  • A cancer drug atlas enables synergistic targeting of independent drug vulnerabilities (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Mesenchymal and adrenergic cell lineage states in neuroblastoma possess distinct immunogenic phenotypes (2022, Nature Cancer)
  • SOX11 regulates SWI/SNF complex components as member of the adrenergic neuroblastoma core regulatory circuitry (2023, Nature Communications)
  • DHODH is an independent prognostic marker and potent therapeutic target in neuroblastoma (2022, JCI Insight)

Versteeg's main topics of work cover:

  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Immune cells in cancer

The scientist's subfields of study include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Neurology
  • Cancer Research
  • Immunology
  • Genetics

Versteeg has published predominantly in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Cancer
  • Nature Communications
  • JCI Insight
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Jan Köster
  • Johan van Nes
  • Ellen M. Westerhout
  • Linda Schild
  • Marli E. Ebus

Overall, Rogier Versteeg's research portfolio encompasses a multidisciplinary approach bridging molecular biology, cancer research, and immunological perspectives, particularly focused on neuroblastoma mechanisms and treatment strategies.

Best Publications

  • Prospective Derivation of a Living Organoid Biobank of Colorectal Cancer Patients

    Marc van de Wetering;Hayley E. Francies;Joshua M. Francis;Joshua M. Francis;Gergana Bounova

  • Hotspot mutations in H3F3A and IDH1 define distinct epigenetic and biological subgroups of glioblastoma.

    Dominik Sturm;Hendrik Witt;Hendrik Witt;Volker Hovestadt;Dong Anh Khuong-Quang

  • Molecular Classification of Ependymal Tumors across All CNS Compartments, Histopathological Grades, and Age Groups

    Kristian W. Pajtler;Kristian W. Pajtler;Hendrik Witt;Martin Sill;David T.W. Jones

  • The Human Transcriptome Map: Clustering of Highly Expressed Genes in Chromosomal Domains

    Huib Caron;Barbera van Schaik;Merlijn van der Mee;Frank Baas

  • New Brain Tumor Entities Emerge from Molecular Classification of CNS-PNETs

    Dominik Sturm;Dominik Sturm;Brent A. Orr;Umut H. Toprak;Volker Hovestadt

  • Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes

    Jan J. Molenaar;Jan Koster;Danny A. Zwijnenburg;Peter van Sluis

  • Genome Sequencing of Pediatric Medulloblastoma Links Catastrophic DNA Rearrangements with TP53 Mutations

    Tobias Rausch;David T.W. Jones;Marc Zapatka;Adrian M. Stütz

  • Integrated Genomics Identifies Five Medulloblastoma Subtypes with Distinct Genetic Profiles, Pathway Signatures and Clinicopathological Features

    Marcel Kool;Jan Koster;Jens Bunt;Nancy E. Hasselt

  • Recurrent somatic alterations of FGFR1 and NTRK2 in pilocytic astrocytoma

    David T W Jones;Barbara Hutter;Natalie Jäger;Andrey Korshunov;Andrey Korshunov

  • The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent ‘+4’ cell markers

    Javier Muñoz;Daniel E Stange;Arnout G Schepers;Marc van de Wetering

  • Genome Sequencing of SHH Medulloblastoma Predicts Genotype-Related Response to Smoothened Inhibition

    Marcel Kool;David T.W. Jones;Natalie Jäger;Paul A. Northcott

  • Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma

    Paul A. Northcott;Catherine Lee;Catherine Lee;Thomas Zichner;Adrian M. Stütz

  • N-myc enhances the expression of a large set of genes functioning in ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis.

    Kathy Boon;Kathy Boon;Huib N. Caron;Ronald Van Asperen;Linda Valentijn

  • Relapsed neuroblastomas show frequent RAS-MAPK pathway mutations

    Thomas F Eleveld;Derek A Oldridge;Virginie Bernard;Jan Koster

  • Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors Are Comprised of Three Epigenetic Subgroups with Distinct Enhancer Landscapes

    Pascal D. Johann;Pascal D. Johann;Serap Erkek;Marc Zapatka;Kornelius Kerl

  • Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 Is Strongly Expressed in Poorly Differentiated Neuroblastoma: Implications for Therapy

    Johannes H. Schulte;Soyoung Lim;Alexander Schramm;Nicolaus Friedrichs

  • Allelic loss of chromosome 1p as a predictor of unfavorable outcome in patients with neuroblastoma.

    H.N. Caron;P. van Sluis;J. de Kraker;J.P.M. Bökkerink

  • Neuroblastoma is composed of two super-enhancer-associated differentiation states

    Tim van Groningen;Jan Koster;Linda J Valentijn;Danny A Zwijnenburg

  • Decoding the regulatory landscape of medulloblastoma using DNA methylation sequencing

    Volker Hovestadt;David T.W. Jones;Simone Picelli;Wei Wang

  • The Human Transcriptome Map Reveals Extremes in Gene Density, Intron Length, GC Content, and Repeat Pattern for Domains of Highly and Weakly Expressed Genes

    Rogier Versteeg;Barbera D.C. van Schaik;Marinus F. van Batenburg;Marco Roos

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Koster
Jan Koster University of Amsterdam
Franki Speleman
Franki Speleman Ghent University
Johannes H. Schulte
Johannes H. Schulte Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Katleen De Preter
Katleen De Preter Ghent University
Genevieve Laureys
Genevieve Laureys Ghent University Hospital
Marcel Kool
Marcel Kool German Cancer Research Center
Raymond L. Stallings
Raymond L. Stallings Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Jo Vandesompele
Jo Vandesompele Ghent University
Andries Westerveld
Andries Westerveld University of Amsterdam
Stefan M. Pfister
Stefan M. Pfister German Cancer Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in Molecular Biology, exploring related online programs can open doors to diverse career options. Many students also look at flexible, accredited online universities that offer specialized science and healthcare programs. Choosing the right school is crucial, so comparisons like which school is better snhu vs wgu can help you weigh factors like reputation, cost, and student support.

For those interested in a healthcare career, affordability and accessibility matter. Resources detailing the cheapest bsn to msn online programs make advanced nursing education more accessible, even for science graduates seeking a new path.

Selecting a quality, trustworthy institution is vital. Explore the non profit online universities that have strong accreditation and offer science degrees, ensuring your education meets the highest standards.

Lastly, if you’re a service member or veteran, choosing from military friendly colleges can help maximize your benefits and give you the flexibility needed to balance military commitments with academic goals.

Best Scientists Citing Rogier Versteeg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles