World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
60
Citations
9838
World Ranking
3180
National Ranking
111

Andries Westerveld publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andries Westerveld sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 213 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Andries Westerveld D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andries Westerveld sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andries Westerveld is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their academic career is connected to this institution, which is known for its research activities across various disciplines.

Currently, there is no public information available regarding their recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues. Additionally, there are no documented contributions in book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or specific research topics associated with their name in the accessible data.

No award recognitions or honors are recorded at this time for Andries Westerveld. Furthermore, they are not listed as deceased, indicating ongoing professional activity or current affiliation status.

Given the limited publicly available data, a detailed outline of their research focus, academic impact, or collaborative networks cannot be provided at this moment.

Best Publications

  • Mutations in a human homologue of Drosophila crumbs cause retinitis pigmentosa (RP12).

    A.I. den Hollander;J.B. ten Brink;Y.J.M. de Kok;S. van Soest

  • Allelic loss of chromosome 1p as a predictor of unfavorable outcome in patients with neuroblastoma.

    H.N. Caron;P. van Sluis;J. de Kraker;J.P.M. Bökkerink

  • Molecular characterization of the human excision repair gene ERCC-1: cDNA cloning and amino acid homology with the yeast DNA repair gene RAD10.

    Marcel van Duin;Jan de Wit;Hanny Odijk;Andries Westerveld

  • Retinitis pigmentosa: defined from a molecular point of view.

    S. van Soest;A. Westerveld;P.T.V.M. de Jong;E.M. Bleeker-Wagemakers

  • Molecular cloning of a human dna repair gene

    A. Westerveld;J. H. J. Hoeijmakers;M. van Duin;J. de Wit

  • Increased tumour risk for BWS patients correlates with aberrant H19 and not KCNQ1OT1 methylation: occurrence of KCNQ1OT1 hypomethylation in familial cases of BWS

    Jet Bliek;Saskia M. Maas;Jan M. Ruijter;Raoul C.M. Hennekam

  • Genetic heterogeneity in the cerebrohepatorenal (Zellweger) syndrome and other inherited disorders with a generalized impairment of peroxisomal functions. A study using complementation analysis.

    S. Brul;A. Westerveld;A. Strijland;R. J. A. Wanders

  • Loss of human genetic markers in man--Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids.

    A. Westerveld;R. P. L. S. Visser;P. Meera Khan;D. Bootsma

  • High-resolution localization of 69 potential human zinc finger protein genes: a number are clustered

    J.M.N. Hoovers;M. Mannens;R. John;J. Bliek

  • Allelic loss of chromosome 1p36 in neuroblastoma is of preferential maternal origin and correlates with N-myc amplification.

    H Caron;P van Sluis;M van Hoeve;J de Kraker

  • Human antigen and enzyme markers in man-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids: evidence for synteny between the HL-A, PGM3, ME1, and IPO-B loci.

    H. Van Someren;A. Westerveld;A. Hagemeijer;J. R. Mees

  • Evidence for two tumour suppressor loci on chromosomal bands 1p35–36 involved in neuroblastoma: one probably imprinted, another associated with N-myc amplification

    Huib Caron;Martine Peter;Peter van Sluis;Frank Speleman

  • Molecular cloning and biological characterization of the human excision repair gene ERCC-3.

    G. Weeda;R. C. A. Van Ham;R. Masurel;A. Westerveld

  • Molecular cloning of the human DNA excision repair gene ERCC-6.

    C. Troelstra;H. Odijk;J. De Wit;A. Westerveld

  • Multiple genetic loci within 11p15 defined by Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome rearrangement breakpoints and subchromosomal transferable fragments.

    Jan M.N. Hoovers;Linda M. Kalikin;Linda M. Kalikin;Laura A. Johnson;Marielle Alders

  • Localization of genes on human chromosomes by studies of human-Chinese hamster somatic cell hybrids. Assignment of PGM3 to chromosome C6 and regional mapping of the PGD, PGM1 and pep-C genes on chromosome A1.

    Ans Jongsma;Harry van Someren;Andries Westerveld;Ann Hagemeijer

  • Assignment of the gene coding for human β-glucocerebrosidase to the region q21-q31 of chromosome 1 using monoclonal antibodies

    Barneveld Ra;Keijzer W;Tegelaers Fp;Ginns Ei

  • Deletion mapping in neuroblastoma cell lines suggests two distinct tumor suppressor genes in the 1p35-36 region, only one of which is associated with N-myc amplification.

    N C Cheng;N Van Roy;A Chan;M Beitsma

  • Centromeric breakage as a major cause of cytogenetic abnormalities in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

    Mario A. J. A. Hermsen;Hans Joenje;Fré Arwert;Marij J. P. Welters

  • Assignment of a gene for autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa (RP12) to chromosome 1q31-q32.1 in an inbred and genetically heterogeneous disease population

    S. Van Soest;L. I. Van Den Born;A. Gal;G. J. Farrar

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Bootsma
Dirk Bootsma Erasmus University Rotterdam
P. Meera Khan
P. Meera Khan Leiden University
Marcel M.A.M. Mannens
Marcel M.A.M. Mannens University of Amsterdam
Thomas B. Shows
Thomas B. Shows Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Rogier Versteeg
Rogier Versteeg University of Amsterdam
Stephen J. O'Brien
Stephen J. O'Brien Nova Southeastern University
Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith
Malcolm A. Ferguson-Smith University of Cambridge
Frank H. Ruddle
Frank H. Ruddle Yale University
Peter L. Pearson
Peter L. Pearson Universidade de São Paulo
Newton E. Morton
Newton E. Morton University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in genetics but want flexible education options, there are several online degree pathways to consider. For those looking to enter the healthcare field quickly, best online medical billing and coding schools offer career-ready programs. These typically require less time than advanced science degrees and can serve as a stepping stone into medical settings.

Accelerated learning is also an option. Choosing one of the fast track schools can help you earn a relevant degree more quickly, allowing you to start your career or move into graduate studies sooner. For busy students or working professionals, a self paced university provides the flexibility to study genetics and related subjects according to your own schedule.

Cost is also a key consideration in your education journey. Many institutions now offer opportunities to apply as a transfer or first-year student without an extra financial burden. Explore colleges with free application fees to minimize upfront costs as you move forward with your academic and career goals in genetics and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Andries Westerveld

Recently Published Articles