World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
109
Citations
57086
World Ranking
5685
National Ranking
3062

Garrett M. Brodeur publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Garrett M. Brodeur sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 352 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Garrett M. Brodeur D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Garrett M. Brodeur sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Garrett M. Brodeur is affiliated with the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in the United States. Their research intersects various areas of medicine, notably focusing on pediatric oncology and genetics. The main fields of study encompass medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with particular emphasis on molecular biology, oncology, neurology, surgery, and genetics within subfields.

The scientific work covers multiple research topics. These include:

  • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
  • Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies

Garrett M. Brodeur has contributed numerous papers to the academic community. Recent publications include:

  • Phenotypic Differences in Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome With or Without a Disease-causing SMAD4/BMPR1A Variant, 2020, Cancer Prevention Research
  • DICER1 RNase IIIb domain mutations trigger widespread miRNA dysregulation and MAPK activation in pediatric thyroid cancer, 2023, Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Update on Cancer Predisposition Syndromes and Surveillance Guidelines for Childhood Brain Tumors, 2024, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Update on Surveillance for Wilms Tumor and Hepatoblastoma in Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome and Other Predisposition Syndromes, 2024, Clinical Cancer Research
  • Adult-Onset Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in Children and Adolescents-To Test or not to Test?, 2024, Clinical Cancer Research

Their research has appeared frequently in several publication venues including:

  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Cancer Research
  • Cancer Prevention Research
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Frequent collaborators in Garrett M. Brodeur's research include Suzanne P. MacFarland, Kristin Zelley, Surya P. Rednam, Lisa Diller, and Junne Kamihara. These coauthors have worked together on various projects, contributing to multiple publications.

Garrett M. Brodeur has received recognition in the scientific community, including being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2001 and membership in the Association of American Physicians. Their work spans decades, reflecting an ongoing commitment to advancing understanding and treatment of pediatric cancers and related genetic conditions.

Best Publications

  • Amplification of N-myc in untreated human neuroblastomas correlates with advanced disease stage

    GM Brodeur;RC Seeger;RC Seeger;M Schwab;HE Varmus

  • Neuroblastoma: biological insights into a clinical enigma.

    Garrett M. Brodeur

  • Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment.

    G M Brodeur;J Pritchard;F Berthold;N L Carlsen

  • Association of multiple copies of the N-myc oncogene with rapid progression of neuroblastomas.

    Robert C. Seeger;Garrett M. Brodeur;Harland Sather;Andree Dalton

  • Treatment of High-Risk Neuroblastoma with Intensive Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation, and 13-cis-Retinoic Acid

    K K Matthay;J G Villablanca;R C Seeger;D O Stram

  • The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Classification System: An INRG Task Force Report

    Susan L. Cohn;Andrew D.J. Pearson;Wendy B. London;Tom Monclair

  • Amplified DNA with limited homology to myc cellular oncogene is shared by human neuroblastoma cell lines and a neuroblastoma tumour.

    Manfred Schwab;Kari Alitalo;Karl Heinz Klempnauer;Harold E. Varmus

  • Expression of Multidrug Resistance Gene in Human Cancers

    Lori J. Goldstein;Hanan Galski;Antonio Fojo;Mark Willingham

  • Identification of ALK as a major familial neuroblastoma predisposition gene

    Yaël P. Mossé;Marci Laudenslager;Luca Longo;Kristina A. Cole

  • The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) Staging System: An INRG Task Force Report

    Tom Monclair;Garrett M. Brodeur;Peter F. Ambros;Hervé J. Brisse

  • Association between high levels of expression of the TRK gene and favorable outcome in human neuroblastoma

    Akira Nakagawara;Miwako Arima-Nakagawara;Nancy J. Scavarda;Christopher G. Azar

  • International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma.

    G M Brodeur;R C Seeger;A Barrett;F Berthold

  • Clinical relevance of tumor cell ploidy and N-myc gene amplification in childhood neuroblastoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

    A T Look;F A Hayes;J J Shuster;E C Douglass

  • Chromosome 1p and 11q deletions and outcome in neuroblastoma.

    Edward F. Attiyeh;Wendy B. London;Yael P. Mossé;Qun Wang

  • Evidence for an Age Cutoff Greater Than 365 Days for Neuroblastoma Risk Group Stratification in the Children's Oncology Group

    W.B. London;R.P. Castleberry;K.K. Matthay;A.T. Look

  • Expression and function of TRK-B and BDNF in human neuroblastomas

    A Nakagawara;C G Azar;N J Scavarda;G M Brodeur

  • Revisions of the international criteria for neuroblastoma diagnosis, staging and response to treatment.

    Brodeur Gm;Pritchard J;Berthold F;Carlsen Nl

  • Random-clone strategy for genomic restriction mapping in yeast.

    Maynard V. Olson;James E. Dutchik;Madge Y. Graham;Garrett M. Brodeur

  • Metastatic sites in stage IV and IVS neuroblastoma correlate with age, tumor biology, and survival.

    Steven DuBois;Yan Kalika;John Lukens;Garrett Brodeur

  • Cytogenetic features of human neuroblastomas and cell lines.

    G M Brodeur;A A Green;F A Hayes;K J Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Maris
John M. Maris Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Susan L. Cohn
Susan L. Cohn University of Chicago
Robert C. Seeger
Robert C. Seeger Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Katherine K. Matthay
Katherine K. Matthay University of California, San Francisco
Michael D. Hogarty
Michael D. Hogarty Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Wendy B. London
Wendy B. London Harvard University
Jaclyn A. Biegel
Jaclyn A. Biegel University of Southern California
A. Thomas Look
A. Thomas Look Harvard University
Daniel O. Stram
Daniel O. Stram University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying medicine in the USA can lead to a wide array of career options, both within and adjacent to clinical practice. For those seeking flexibility or alternative paths in healthcare, online programs are becoming increasingly popular and accessible.

Many students are drawn to fields like health information management, where demand is rising for professionals skilled in organizing and securing medical data. Pursuing an online bachelor's in health information management is a strategic way to enter this expanding area.

For a shorter, workforce-focused credential, consider the cheapest medical billing and coding online courses. These fast-track options help prepare students for roles handling crucial administrative tasks in healthcare settings.

Nursing programs continue to be in high demand nationwide. If your interest is in patient care, there are several affordable nursing programs that offer online courses, making it possible to balance studies with work or family commitments.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their careers, affordable online fnp programs provide a flexible route to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. These programs blend online coursework with practical experiences, opening up new leadership roles in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Garrett M. Brodeur

Trending Scientists