World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Donald E. Mitchell

Donald E. Mitchell

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
7274
World Ranking
5613
National Ranking
329

Donald E. Mitchell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald E. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 125 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Donald E. Mitchell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald E. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald E. Mitchell is affiliated with Dalhousie University in Canada and has contributed research primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine. Their work spans various subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology, and Neurology.

The main topics covered in Mitchell's research include:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Mitchell's recent publications highlight a focus on visual and neurological science. Selected papers include:

  • "Critical Periods in Vision Revisited," published in 2022 by the Annual Review of Vision Science
  • "My 50 Year Odyssey to Develop Behavioral Methods to Let Me See Quickly How Well Kittens See," published in 2025 in eNeuro

In addition to these, the broader research context around Mitchell features publications in multidisciplinary venues such as Frontiers in Neuroscience and the Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology, indicating intersections with medical imaging and disease diagnosis.

Frequent co-authors contributing to or collaborating in related research include Daphne Maurer, Christopher J. Clark, Katelyn MacNeill, Amber Myatt, and Kevin R. Duffy.

Mitchell's research has appeared in multiple publication venues, reflecting interdisciplinary interests. These venues comprise:

  • Annual Review of Vision Science
  • eNeuro
  • Birds of the World
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology

Overall, Donald E. Mitchell's scholarly output demonstrates engagement with mechanisms of visual processing, neurodevelopment in animal models, and aspects of clinical diagnostics related to neurological and liver diseases.

Best Publications

  • Prolonged sensitivity to monocular deprivation in dark-reared cats.

    M. Cynader;D. E. Mitchell

  • Meridional amblyopia: evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience.

    Donald E. Mitchell;Ralph D. Freeman;Michel Millodot;Gunilla Haegerstrom

  • Environmental Modification of the Visual Cortex and the Neural Basis of Learning and Memory

    Colin Blakemore;Donald E. Mitchell;Donald E. Mitchell

  • The rate of recovery of vision after early monocular deprivation in kittens

    Fred Giffin;Donald E. Mitchell

  • The sensory stimulus for disjunctive eye movements.

    Gerald Westheimer;Donald E. Mitchell

  • Effect of orientation on the modulation sensitivity for interference fringes on the retina.

    Donald E. Mitchell;Ralph D. Freeman;Gerald Westheimer

  • Binocular depth perception and the corpus callosum

    Donald E. Mitchell;Colin Blakemore

  • A neural effect of partial visual deprivation in humans.

    Ralph D. Freeman;Donald E. Mitchell;Michel Millodot

  • Visual resolution in young kittens

    Donald E. Mitchell;Fred Giffin;Frances Wilkinson;Patricia Anderson

  • Postnatal Development of Function in the Mammalian Visual System

    Donald E. Mitchell;Brian Timney

  • The development of vision in cats after extended periods of dark-rearing.

    B. Timney;D. E. Mitchell;F. Giffin

  • Darkness Alters Maturation of Visual Cortex and Promotes Fast Recovery from Monocular Deprivation

    Kevin R. Duffy;Donald E. Mitchell

  • The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect

    Colin Ware;Donald E Mitchell

  • A Behavioural Technique for the Rapid Assessment of the Visual Capabilities of Kittens

    Donald E Mitchell;Fred Giffin;Brian Timney

  • Interocular transfer of a visual after-effect in normal and stereoblind humans

    Donald E. Mitchell;Colin Ware

  • Recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation in kittens

    Donald E. Mitchell;Max Cynader;J. Anthony Movshon

  • Period of susceptibility of kitten visual cortex to the effects of monocular deprivation extends beyond six months of age.

    M. Cynader;B.N. Timney;D.E. Mitchell

  • A physiological and behavioural study in cats of the effect of early visual experience with contours of a single orientation.

    G G Blasdel;D E Mitchell;D W Muir;J D Pettigrew

  • Visual Resolution and Experience: Acuity Deficits in Cats Following Early Selective Visual Deprivation

    Darwin W. Muir;Donald E. Mitchell

  • Correlated binocular activity guides recovery from monocular deprivation

    Peter C. Kind;Donald E. Mitchell;Bashir Ahmed;Colin Blakemore

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Sengpiel
Frank Sengpiel Cardiff University
Peter C. Kind
Peter C. Kind University of Edinburgh
Colin Blakemore
Colin Blakemore City University of Hong Kong
Max S. Cynader
Max S. Cynader University of British Columbia
Ralph D. Freeman
Ralph D. Freeman University of California, Berkeley
John D. Pettigrew
John D. Pettigrew University of Queensland
Robert F. Hess
Robert F. Hess McGill University
Raymond D. Lund
Raymond D. Lund University of Utah
Gerald Westheimer
Gerald Westheimer University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a neuroscience degree online opens up a range of educational and career options. Many students explore accelerated bachelor degree programs to fast-track their studies and enter the workforce sooner. These programs can make it easier to balance education with other commitments.

Additionally, neuroscience is closely related to several degrees that pay well, such as biomedical engineering or computer science, both of which are known to offer lucrative salaries. In fact, many neuroscience graduates pursue roles in fields recognized as some of the highest paying college majors, especially within health, technology, or pharmaceutical research.

Prospective students can also make education more affordable by enrolling in accredited online colleges that accept fafsa. This not only lowers tuition costs but also ensures eligibility for federal student aid, making a neuroscience education accessible to more learners.

Best Scientists Citing Donald E. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles