World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Peter Wenderoth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wenderoth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Peter Wenderoth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Wenderoth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Wenderoth was affiliated with Macquarie University in Australia during their academic career. The focus of their research, as reflected in their professional association, was within the domain of cognitive science and related interdisciplinary studies.

There are no specific papers, coauthors, or publication venues listed for their work, which limits details on their research output and collaborations. Similarly, there are no recorded book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study available for this scientist.

Due to the lack of publicly available information on recent papers, coauthors, or awards, the profile remains centered on the affiliation and the presumed general field of study. This indicates a professional presence at an established institution, contributing to academic knowledge through unspecified means.

Best Publications

  • A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision.

    Colin W. G. Clifford;Peter Wenderoth;Branka Spehar

  • The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions

    Peter Wenderoth;Syren Johnstone

  • The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian

    Brian O'Toole;Peter Wenderoth

  • Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination.

    Colin W. G. Clifford;Anna M. A. Wyatt;Derek H. Arnold;Stuart T. Smith

  • Asynchronous processing in vision: color leads motion.

    Derek H Arnold;Colin W.G Clifford;Peter Wenderoth

  • Possible Neural Substrates for Orientation Analysis and Perception

    Peter Wenderoth;Syren Johnstone

  • Theangular function of arod-and-frame illusion

    Helen C. Beh;Peter M. Wenderoth;A. T. Purcell

  • Detection of Bilateral Symmetry in Complex Biological Images

    Christopher S Evans;Peter Wenderoth;Ken Cheng

  • Adaptation to temporal modulation can enhance differential speed sensitivity.

    Colin W.G. Clifford;Peter Wenderoth

  • The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry.

    Vincent A. Nguyen;Alan W. Freeman;Peter Wenderoth

  • Component Analysis of Orientation Illusions

    Peter Wenderoth;Helen Beh

  • The role of pattern outline in bilateral symmetry detection with briefly flashed dot patterns.

    Peter Wenderoth

  • Psychophysical evidence for area V2 involvement in the reduction of subjective contour tilt aftereffects by binocular rivalry

    Rick van der Zwan;Peter Wenderoth

  • The distinction between the rod-and-frame illusion and the rod-and-frame test.

    P M Wenderoth

  • The contribution of one-dimensional motion mechanisms to the perceived direction of drifting plaids and their aftereffects

    David Alais;Peter Wenderoth;Darren Burke

  • Evidence that both area V1 and extrastriate visual cortex contribute to symmetry perception

    R. van der Zwan;E. Leo;W. Joung;C. Latimer

  • The tilt illusion as a function of the relative and absolute lengths of test and inducing lines.

    Peter Wenderoth;Tony O’Connor;Michael Johnson

  • The effects of exposure duration and surrounding frames on direct and indirect tilt aftereffects and illusions

    Peter Wenderoth;Rick van der Zwan

  • The differential effects of brief exposures and surrounding contours on direct and indirect tilt illusions.

    Peter Wenderoth;Syren Johnstone

  • Reduction of a pattern-induced motion aftereffect by binocular rivalry suggests the involvement of extrastriate mechanisms

    Rick Van Der Zwan;Peter Wenderoth;David Alais

Frequent Co-Authors

Colin W. G. Clifford
Colin W. G. Clifford University of New South Wales
David Alais
David Alais University of Sydney
John J. Furedy
John J. Furedy University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens up a range of related online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many universities now offer flexible online programs in psychology, counseling, and related fields, making it more convenient for students across the country to access quality education.

If you are interested in counseling or therapy as a career, there are specialized counseling programs available in different regions. For example, Texas counseling degree programs provide a strong foundation in clinical practice and community services. Similarly, those looking at options in the Pacific Northwest should consider the top counseling degree programs in Washington.

For students looking to study in urban environments, Washington, D.C. counseling degree programs offer access to government agencies, nonprofits, and advocacy organizations. Additionally, aspiring counselors in the western U.S. can explore accredited West counseling degree programs.

Pursuing these degrees can lead to rewarding roles in mental health, school counseling, community outreach, and beyond—each with unique licensure and specialization options.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Wenderoth