World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 36 6484 6028 3135 2862 115 5666

Matthew Goldrick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew Goldrick between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew Goldrick published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2022. 13 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2022. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
1999 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew Goldrick: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 2
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 3
2005 0
2006 3
2007 4
2008 6
2009 7
2010 3
2011 5
2012 4
2013 3
2014 9
2015 9
2016 10
2017 9
2018 8
2019 9
2020 8
2021 7
2022 12
2023 7
2024 8
2025 5
Total 146
Download as CSV

Matthew Goldrick publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Goldrick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 115
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew Goldrick D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Goldrick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261 36
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew Goldrick is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within psychology and computer science, with a notable focus on the intersection of language, cognition, and computational methods.

The scientist has contributed extensively to fields such as psychology, with 36 publications, and computer science, with 28 publications. Their work is further specialized in subfields including experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and signal processing.

Goldrick's research covers a range of topics centered around language and speech, including:

  • Phonetics and phonology research
  • Neurobiology of language and bilingualism
  • Linguistic variation and morphology
  • Speech recognition and synthesis
  • Speech and audio processing
  • Language development and disorders
  • Speech and dialogue systems

The scientist has published in multiple venues, with their frequent publication outlets comprising:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (12 publications)
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (2 publications)
  • JASA Express Letters (2 publications)
  • Cognitive Science (2 publications)
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (2 publications)

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Goldrick and colleagues include:

  • "Understanding Language Abnormalities and Associated Clinical Markers in Psychosis: The Promise of Computational Methods" (2020, Schizophrenia Bulletin)
  • "Neurocompositional computing: From the Central Paradox of Cognition to a new generation of AI systems" (2022, AI Magazine)
  • "Racial and Ethnic Biases in Computational Approaches to Psychopathology" (2021, Schizophrenia Bulletin)
  • "Inhibitory control of the dominant language: Reversed language dominance is the tip of the iceberg" (2023, Journal of Memory and Language)
  • "Cascading activation in phonological planning and articulation: Evidence from spontaneous speech errors" (2021, Cognition)

Goldrick frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Joseph Keshet, Kasia Hitczenko, Ann R. Bradlow, Yael Segal, and Vijay A. Mittal, with collaboration counts ranging from five to ten joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production.

    Brenda Rapp;Matthew Goldrick

  • Mechanisms of interaction in speech production

    Melissa Baese-Berk;Matthew Goldrick

  • Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters

    Matthew Goldrick;Sheila E. Blumstein

  • Lexical and Post-Lexical Phonological Representations in Spoken Production.

    Matthew Goldrick;Brenda Rapp

  • Optimization and Quantization in Gradient Symbol Systems: A Framework for Integrating the Continuous and the Discrete in Cognition

    Paul Smolensky;Matthew Goldrick;Donald Mathis

  • The Oxford Handbook of Language Production

    Matthew Andrew Goldrick;Victor S. Ferreira;Michele Miozzo

  • Turbid Output Representations and the Unity of Opacity

    Matthew Goldrick

  • Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence

    Matthew Goldrick

  • Language Switching Makes Pronunciation Less Nativelike

    Matthew Goldrick;Elin Runnqvist;Albert Costa

  • Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production

    Matthew Goldrick

  • Mrs. Malaprop's Neighborhood: Using Word Errors to Reveal Neighborhood Structure.

    Matthew Goldrick;Matthew Goldrick;Jocelyn R. Folk;Brenda Rapp

  • A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds

    Matthew Goldrick;Brenda Rapp

  • Phonological neighborhood effects in spoken word production: An fmri study

    Dasun Peramunage;Sheila E. Blumstein;Emily B. Myers;Matthew Goldrick

  • Coactivation in bilingual grammars: A computational account of code mixing

    Matthew Goldrick;Michael Putnam;Lara Schwarz

  • The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What's the point?

    Jocelyn R. Folk;Brenda Rapp;Matthew Goldrick

  • Phonotactic probability influences speech production.

    Matthew Goldrick;Meredith Larson

  • Differential Representation of Articulatory Gestures and Phonemes in Precentral and Inferior Frontal Gyri.

    Emily M. Mugler;Matthew C. Tate;Karen Livescu;Jessica W. Templer

  • Speaking words: Contributions of cognitive neuropsychological research

    Brenda Rapp;Matthew Goldrick

  • Interaction and representational integration: evidence from speech errors.

    Matthew A Goldrick;H. Ross Baker;Amanda Murphy;Melissa Baese-Berk

  • The effects of lexical neighbors on stop consonant articulation

    Matthew Goldrick;Charlotte Vaughn;Amanda Murphy

  • Grammatical Constraints on Language Switching: Language Control is not Just Executive Control.

    Tamar H. Gollan;Matthew Goldrick

  • Pervasive Benefits of Preparation in Language Switching

    Angela Fink;Matthew Goldrick

  • Feedback by Any Other Name Is Still Interactivity: A Reply to Roelofs (2004).

    Brenda Rapp;Matthew A Goldrick

  • The emergence of sub-syllabic representations

    Yongeun Lee;Matthew Goldrick

  • Understanding Language Abnormalities and Associated Clinical Markers in Psychosis: The Promise of Computational Methods.

    Kasia Hitczenko;Vijay A Mittal;Matthew Goldrick

  • Grammatical constraints on phonological encoding in speech production.

    Jordana R. Heller;Matthew Goldrick

  • Empirical and conceptual challenges for neurocognitive theories of language production

    Laurel Brehm;Matthew Goldrick

  • A switch is not a switch: Syntactically-driven bilingual language control.

    Tamar H. Gollan;Matthew Goldrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Brenda Rapp
Brenda Rapp Johns Hopkins University
Paul Smolensky
Paul Smolensky Microsoft (United States)
Vijay A. Mittal
Vijay A. Mittal Northwestern University
Tamar H. Gollan
Tamar H. Gollan University of California, San Diego
Victor S. Ferreira
Victor S. Ferreira University of California, San Diego
Karen Livescu
Karen Livescu Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
Pienie Zwitserlood
Pienie Zwitserlood University of Münster
Sheila E. Blumstein
Sheila E. Blumstein Brown University
Albert Costa
Albert Costa Pompeu Fabra University
Gary S. Dell
Gary S. Dell University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a variety of career opportunities. Many students pursue advanced psychology programs, such as accredited psyd programs, which prepare graduates for clinical practice and leadership roles in mental health. If you're interested in marriage and family therapy, you may want to consider mft programs that offer flexibility and specialized training for working with couples and families.

For those seeking affordable and flexible learning options, an online masters degree psychology can be a great way to deepen your understanding of human behavior and prepare for diverse professional roles in counseling, education, or research.

Aspiring educational leaders might consider fast-track options like 2 year ed d programs online. These programs are designed for working professionals looking to boost their credentials and impact in the field of education.

Whichever path you choose, online degrees offer the flexibility to balance your studies with personal and professional commitments, making it easier to advance your career in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Goldrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles