World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antje S. Meyer

Antje S. Meyer

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
22681
World Ranking
3630
National Ranking
161

Antje S. Meyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antje S. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Antje S. Meyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antje S. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2014 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Antje S. Meyer is affiliated with the Max Planck Society in Germany. Their research spans psychology and neuroscience, with particular focus on cognitive neuroscience and developmental and educational psychology. The range of subfields they contribute to also includes experimental and cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, and language and linguistics.

Themes central to their work involve neurobiology of language and bilingualism, reading and literacy development, language, metaphor, and cognition, language development and disorders, second language acquisition and learning, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and speech and dialogue systems.

Several frequent coauthors collaborate with Antje S. Meyer, including Florian Hintz, Andrea E. Martin, James M. McQueen, Hans Rutger Bosker, and Ruth E. Corps.

Publication venues where their work appears most often consist of the Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Journal of Neuroscience, Cognition, Journal of Cognition, and PLoS ONE.

Representative recent papers by Antje S. Meyer include the following:

  • "Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability," 2021, Cognition
  • "Neural dynamics differentially encode phrases and sentences during spoken language comprehension," 2022, PLoS Biology
  • "Literacy can enhance syntactic prediction in spoken language processing," 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "The Role of Social Network Structure in the Emergence of Linguistic Structure," 2020, Cognitive Science

Recognition for their contributions to the scientific community includes election as a member of the Academia Europaea in 2014 and induction into the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2018.

Best Publications

  • A theory of lexical access in speech production.

    Willem J. M. Levelt;Ardi Roelofs;Antje S. Meyer

  • Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: Picture-word interference studies

    H. Schriefers;Antje S. Meyer;Willem J. M. Levelt

  • What do verbal fluency tasks measure? Predictors of verbal fluency performance in older adults

    Zeshu Shao;Esther Janse;Esther Janse;Karina Visser;Antje S. Meyer;Antje S. Meyer

  • The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming

    Willem J. M. Levelt;Herbert Schriefers;Dirk Vorberg;Antje S. Meyer

  • Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation.

    Falk Huettig;Joost Rommers;Joost Rommers;Antje S. Meyer;Antje S. Meyer

  • Viewing and naming objects : eye movements during noun phrase production

    Antje S. Meyer;Astrid M. Sleiderink;Willem J. M. Levelt

  • The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological encoding inside a syllable

    Antje S. Meyer

  • Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments

    Antje S. Meyer

  • The time course of phonological encoding in language production: The encoding of successive syllables of a word ☆

    Antje S. Meyer

  • An MEG Study of Picture Naming

    Willem J. M. Levelt;Peter Praamstra;Antje S. Meyer;Päivi Helenius

  • Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli.

    Antje S. Meyer;H. Schriefers

  • Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in language production.

    Gary S. Dell;Kristopher D. Reed;David R. Adams;Antje S. Meyer

  • MultiPic: a standardized set of 750 drawings with norms for six European languages

    Jon Andoni Duñabeitia;Davide Crepaldi;Davide Crepaldi;Antje S. Meyer;Antje S. Meyer;Boris New;Boris New

  • The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation?

    Antje S. Meyer;Kathryn Bock

  • Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm

    Eva Belke;Antje S. Meyer;Markus F. Damian

  • Semantic Category Interference in Overt Picture Naming: Sharpening Current Density Localization by PCA

    Burkhard Maess;Angela D. Friederici;Markus Damian;Antje S. Meyer

  • Some attractions of verb agreement.

    Kathryn Bock;Kathleen M. Eberhard;J. Cooper Cutting;Antje S. Meyer

  • Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion

    Antje S. Meyer;Ardi Roelofs;Willem J. M. Levelt

  • Metrical structure in planning the production of spoken words

    Ardi Roelofs;Antje S. Meyer

  • Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: achievements, limitations, and alternatives.

    Antje S. Meyer

  • An MEG study of picture naming

    P. Praamstra;W.J.M. Levelt;A.S. Meyer;R. Salmelin

Frequent Co-Authors

Willem J. M. Levelt
Willem J. M. Levelt Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
Ardi Roelofs
Ardi Roelofs Radboud University
Herbert Schriefers
Herbert Schriefers Radboud University
Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford
Niels O. Schiller
Niels O. Schiller Leiden University
Markus F. Damian
Markus F. Damian University of Bristol
Riitta Salmelin
Riitta Salmelin Aalto University
Kathryn Bock
Kathryn Bock University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Riitta Hari
Riitta Hari Aalto University
Angela D. Friederici
Angela D. Friederici Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens diverse career opportunities, especially in fields like substance abuse counseling. Many students pursue online psychology degrees to build foundational knowledge before specializing further. The pathway to becoming a counselor varies by state and city, with unique educational and certification requirements.

For example, if you are interested in learning how to become a substance abuse counselor in Milwaukee, you’ll need to understand Wisconsin’s specific licensure process. Similarly, the Minneapolis substance abuse counselors education requirements are tailored by state standards, often including both coursework and supervised experience.

Requirements can be quite different in other areas. Those seeking to practice in Tennessee should review the Nashville substance abuse counselor certification requirements. Meanwhile, aspiring professionals in Louisiana can consult the New Orleans substance abuse counselor certification requirements for details on state-specific certifications.

Online psychology degrees provide flexible options for students nationwide, but it’s important to research local regulations when considering this career path.

Best Scientists Citing Antje S. Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles