World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
13735
World Ranking
4752
National Ranking
2209

Karen Livescu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Livescu sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 164 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Karen Livescu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen Livescu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen Livescu is affiliated with the Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The main topics covered in their work include Speech Recognition and Synthesis, Natural Language Processing Techniques, Topic Modeling, Music and Audio Processing, Hand Gesture Recognition Systems, Speech and Audio Processing, and Hearing Impairment and Communication.

Livescu has published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • "Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Review", 2022, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
  • "What Do Self-Supervised Speech Models Know About Words?", 2024, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • "Layer-Wise Analysis of a Self-Supervised Speech Representation Model", 2021, 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)
  • "Chess as a Testbed for Language Model State Tracking", 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "A Correspondence Variational Autoencoder for Unsupervised Acoustic Word Embeddings", 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Their frequent coauthors include the following researchers:

  • Shinji Watanabe
  • Ankita Pasad
  • Suwon Shon
  • Hung-yi Lee
  • Kevin Gimpel

Livescu's work has appeared repeatedly in certain publication venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
  • Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • 2021 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)

Best Publications

  • Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis

    Galen Andrew;Raman Arora;Jeff Bilmes;Karen Livescu

  • Multi-view clustering via canonical correlation analysis

    Kamalika Chaudhuri;Sham M. Kakade;Karen Livescu;Karthik Sridharan

  • On Deep Multi-View Representation Learning

    Weiran Wang;Raman Arora;Karen Livescu;Jeff Bilmes

  • Towards Universal Paraphrastic Sentence Embeddings

    John Wieting;Mohit Bansal;Kevin Gimpel;Karen Livescu

  • Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 2007 (ICASSP 2007)

    K. Livescu;A. Bezman;N. Borges;L. Yung

  • Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning: A Review

    Unknown

  • Tailoring Continuous Word Representations for Dependency Parsing

    Mohit Bansal;Kevin Gimpel;Karen Livescu

  • From Paraphrase Database to Compositional Paraphrase Model and Back

    John Wieting;Mohit Bansal;Kevin Gimpel;Karen Livescu

  • Speech production knowledge in automatic speech recognition.

    Simon King;Joe Frankel;Karen Livescu;Erik McDermott

  • Charagram: Embedding Words and Sentences via Character n-grams

    John Wieting;Mohit Bansal;Kevin Gimpel;Karen Livescu

  • Stochastic optimization for PCA and PLS

    Raman Arora;Andrew Cotter;Karen Livescu;Nathan Srebro

  • Pre-training on high-resource speech recognition improves low-resource speech-to-text translation

    Sameer Bansal;Herman Kamper;Karen Livescu;Adam Lopez

  • Deep convolutional acoustic word embeddings using word-pair side information

    Herman Kamper;Weiran Wang;Karen Livescu

  • Deep Multilingual Correlation for Improved Word Embeddings

    Ang Lu;Weiran Wang;Mohit Bansal;Kevin Gimpel

  • Unsupervised learning of acoustic features via deep canonical correlation analysis

    Weiran Wang;Raman Arora;Karen Livescu;Jeff A. Bilmes

  • Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing

    David Yarowsky;Timothy Baldwin;Anna Korhonen;Karen Livescu

  • A Comparison of Techniques for Language Model Integration in Encoder-Decoder Speech Recognition

    Shubham Toshniwal;Anjuli Kannan;Chung-Cheng Chiu;Yonghui Wu

  • Articulatory Feature-Based Methods for Acoustic and Audio-Visual Speech Recognition: Summary from the 2006 JHU Summer workshop

    K. Livescu;O. Cetin;M. Hasegawa-Johnson;S. King

  • Landmark-based speech recognition: report of the 2004 Johns Hopkins summer workshop

    M. Hasegawa-Johnson;J. Baker;S. Borys;K. Chen

  • Fixed-dimensional acoustic embeddings of variable-length segments in low-resource settings

    Keith Levin;Katharine Henry;Aren Jansen;Karen Livescu

  • Deep Variational Canonical Correlation Analysis

    Weiran Wang;Honglak Lee;Karen Livescu

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Gimpel
Kevin Gimpel Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
Mohit Bansal
Mohit Bansal University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Gregory Shakhnarovich
Gregory Shakhnarovich Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
Jeff A. Bilmes
Jeff A. Bilmes University of Washington
Diane Brentari
Diane Brentari University of Chicago
Sharon Goldwater
Sharon Goldwater University of Edinburgh
Kate Saenko
Kate Saenko Boston University
Mark Hasegawa-Johnson
Mark Hasegawa-Johnson University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Mari Ostendorf
Mari Ostendorf University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the USA can open up a wide range of career pathways in technology and beyond. For students seeking flexibility and affordability, several options stand out. If you aim to further your studies at the graduate level without breaking the bank, reviewing the most affordable online masters is a great place to start.

For those aspiring to top leadership positions or academic roles, investing in a doctorate organizational leadership online can provide specialized expertise and credentials. Alternatively, if you’re looking for a quicker path to employment or a stepping stone into Computer Science, the easiest associate degree programs can get you started in a tech career with less time and cost.

Educators and those interested in academic leadership may consider the cheapest online edd programs no gre for a cost-effective path to earning a Doctor of Education without strict entrance exam requirements. No matter your goal, online degrees offer flexible, accessible entry points to a rewarding future in Computer Science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Karen Livescu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles