What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Bacteria, Microbiology, Biochemistry and Flow cytometry.
The various areas that Philippe Lebaron examines in his Ecology study include Microbial ecology, Gammaproteobacteria, Botany and Microbial population biology.
He combines subjects such as Euryarchaeota, Archaea, Phytoplankton and Prochlorococcus with his study of Botany.
Philippe Lebaron specializes in Bacteria, namely Industrial microbiology.
The concepts of his Microbiology study are interwoven with issues in Sulfitobacter, Salmonella, Proteobacteria, Phylogenetics and Taxonomy.
Philippe Lebaron focuses mostly in the field of Flow cytometry, narrowing it down to matters related to Staining and, in some cases, Mesocosm, Formazan, Membrane permeability and Artificial seawater.
His most cited work include:
- Does the high nucleic acid content of individual bacterial cells allow us to discriminate between active cells and inactive cells in aquatic systems (309 citations)
- Use of fluorescent probes to assess physiological functions of bacteria at single-cell level. (303 citations)
- Comparison of Blue Nucleic Acid Dyes for Flow Cytometric Enumeration of Bacteria in Aquatic Systems (238 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Ecology, Bacteria, Microbiology, Botany and Mediterranean sea.
His study explores the link between Ecology and topics such as Microbial population biology that cross with problems in Community structure.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Biophysics and Biochemistry.
His work investigates the relationship between Microbiology and topics such as Flow cytometry that intersect with problems in Staining, Seawater and Salmonella.
His Botany research integrates issues from Bloom, Phytoplankton, 16S ribosomal RNA, Gammaproteobacteria and Roseobacter.
His Mediterranean sea research includes elements of Prochlorococcus, Bacterioplankton, Chlorophyll a, Environmental chemistry and Oceanography.
He most often published in these fields:
- Ecology (42.23%)
- Bacteria (35.92%)
- Microbiology (25.24%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?
- Ecology (42.23%)
- Bacteria (35.92%)
- Gene (8.74%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Ecology, Bacteria, Gene, Whole genome sequencing and Genome.
Philippe Lebaron studies Abundance, a branch of Ecology.
His research in Bacteria intersects with topics in Degradation, Effluent and Metagenomics.
His Quorum sensing study combines topics in areas such as Global ocean sampling and Microbiology.
His Microbiology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Agar plate, Legionella and Filter.
Gammaproteobacteria connects with themes related to Botany in his study.
Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Seasonal dynamics of active SAR11 ecotypes in the oligotrophic Northwest Mediterranean Sea. (62 citations)
- A single betaproteobacterium dominates the microbial community of the crambescidine-containing sponge Crambe crambe (40 citations)
- Summer community structure of aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria in the western Arctic Ocean (30 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Philippe Lebaron focuses on Ecology, Biochemistry, Quorum sensing, Bacteria and Abundance.
His Ecology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Water mass, Prochlorococcus and Actinobacteria.
His Biochemistry study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Toxicity.
His Quorum sensing research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Proteobacteria and Pathogen, Microbiology.
His study in Bacteria is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Crambe crambe, Sponge, Botany and Crambe.
His studies deal with areas such as Environmental chemistry, Total organic carbon and Zooplankton as well as Abundance.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
