World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
12856
World Ranking
7037
National Ranking
938

Kai-Fu Lee publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kai-Fu Lee sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 100 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kai-Fu Lee D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kai-Fu Lee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kai-Fu Lee is affiliated with Sinovation Ventures in China and focuses research efforts primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Medicine. Their scholarly work intersects several subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Demography, Epidemiology, and Aging.

The scientist's research covers a range of topics such as Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging; Frailty in Older Adults; Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management; Chronic Disease Management Strategies; and Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms.

Recent publication venues for Kai-Fu Lee include Nature Aging, The Lancet Healthy Longevity, and Aging. The recent papers comprise:

  • Artificial intelligence in longevity medicine (2021, Nature Aging)
  • Advanced pathological ageing should be represented in the ICD (2022, The Lancet Healthy Longevity)
  • Meeting Report: Aging Research and Drug Discovery (2022, Aging)

Frequent collaborators in Lee's research include Alex Zhavoronkov, Evelyne Bischof, Andrea B. Maier, David Sinclair, and Esther Meron. The number of joint publications varies, with the highest co-authorship counts linking to Alex Zhavoronkov and Evelyne Bischof.

Best Publications

  • Speaker-independent phone recognition using hidden Markov models

    K.-F. Lee;H.-W. Hon

  • Automatic speech recognition : the development of the SPHINX system

    Kai-Fu Lee;Raj Reddy

  • Search engine with natural language-based robust parsing for user query and relevance feedback learning

    Hai-Feng Wang;Kai-Fu Lee;Qiang Yang

  • An overview of the SPHINX speech recognition system

    K.-F. Lee;H.-W. Hon;R. Reddy

  • Automatic Speech Recognition

    Kai-Fu Lee

  • The SPHINX-II Speech Recognition System: An Overview

    Xuedong Huang;Fileno Alleva;Hsiao Hon;Mei Hwang

  • Large-vocabulary speaker-independent continuous speech recognition: the sphinx system

    Raj Reddy;Kai-Fu Lee

  • Context-independent phonetic hidden Markov models for speaker-independent continuous speech recognition

    K.-F. Lee

  • Readings in speech recognition

    Alex Waibel;Kai-Fu Lee

  • On large-vocabulary speaker-independent continuous speech recognition

    K. F. Lee

  • Language input architecture for converting one text form to another text form with tolerance to spelling, typographical, and conversion errors

    Kai-Fu Lee;Zheng Chen;Jian Han

  • Handwriting signal processing front-end for handwriting recognizers

    Kamil A. Grajski;Yen-Lu Chow;Kai-Fu Lee

  • Speaker adaptation through vector quantization

    K. Shikano;Kai-Fu Lee;R. Reddy

  • A rapid tree-based method for vector quantization

    Alejandro Acero;Kai-Fu Lee;Yen-Lu Chow

  • Toward a unified approach to statistical language modeling for Chinese

    Jianfeng Gao;Joshua Goodman;Mingjing Li;Kai-Fu Lee

  • On speaker-independent, speaker-dependent, and speaker-adaptive speech recognition

    X. Huang;K.F. Lee

  • Connectionist Viterbi training: a new hybrid method for continuous speech recognition

    M. Franzini;K.-F. Lee;A. Waibel

  • CMU robust vocabulary-independent speech recognition system

    H.-W. Hon;K.-F. Lee

  • The development of a world class Othello program

    Kai-Fu Lee;Sanjoy Mahajan

  • Large-vocabulary speaker-independent continuous speech recognition using HMM

    K.-F. Lee;H.-W. Hon

Frequent Co-Authors

Hsiao-Wuen Hon
Hsiao-Wuen Hon Microsoft Research Asia (China)
Mei-Yuh Hwang
Mei-Yuh Hwang Microsoft (United States)
Zheng Chen
Zheng Chen Microsoft Research Asia (China)
Xuedong Huang
Xuedong Huang Microsoft (United States)
Jianfeng Gao
Jianfeng Gao Microsoft (United States)
Haifeng Wang
Haifeng Wang Baidu (China)
Alex Waibel
Alex Waibel Carnegie Mellon University
Eric Chang
Eric Chang Microsoft (United States)
Qiang Yang
Qiang Yang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your expertise in Computer Science can unlock diverse career opportunities. Many students look for flexible, cost-effective options to further their education. For those concerned about tuition costs, exploring the cheapest data science degree programs in the USA is a popular choice. These programs offer strong pathways into high-demand analytics roles without the heavy financial burden.

If you’re interested in blending hardware and software skills, starting with an online electrical engineering career outcomes guide can help you understand potential job prospects and specialization areas.

For a shorter commitment, consider easy certifications that pay well. These quick programs can boost your resume and skills while opening doors to technical positions such as network support, cloud administration, or cybersecurity.

Those aiming for rapid advancement should also look into the quickest masters degree online options. Many universities offer accelerated master’s in technology fields, allowing professionals to upskill and move forward in their careers faster than traditional programs.

Best Scientists Citing Kai-Fu Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles