World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
21864
World Ranking
1958
National Ranking
993

Nelson Morgan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nelson Morgan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 278 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nelson Morgan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nelson Morgan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Senior Member
  • 1999 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the processing and recognition of brain and speech signals.

Overview

Nelson Morgan is affiliated with the International Computer Science Institute in the United States. Their professional recognition includes being named an IEEE Fellow in 1999 for contributions to the processing and recognition of brain and speech signals. They were also designated as an ACM Senior Member in 2009.

Their research is situated primarily within the fields of computer science and signal processing, with a particular focus on brain and speech signal processing methods. This specialization reflects the contributions for which they received the IEEE fellowship.

Details regarding recent publications, coauthors, publication venues, main topics, subfields, and book publications are not provided. However, the awards listed indicate an emphasis on advanced computational techniques applied to neural and auditory signal analysis.

Nelson Morgan's work aligns with interdisciplinary efforts intersecting computer science, neuroscience, and speech technology. Their affiliation with an international research institute supports a research environment oriented toward computational and applied science.

Best Publications

  • RASTA processing of speech

    H. Hermansky;N. Morgan

  • Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach

    Herve A. Bourlard;Nelson Morgan

  • Speech and Audio Signal Processing: Processing and Perception of Speech and Music

    Ben Gold;Nelson Morgan;Dan Ellis

  • A view of the parallel computing landscape

    Krste Asanovic;Rastislav Bodik;James Demmel;Tony Keaveny

  • The ICSI Meeting Corpus

    A. Janin;D. Baron;J. Edwards;D. Ellis

  • RASTA-PLP speech analysis technique

    H. Hermansky;N. Morgan;A. Bayya;P. Kohn

  • Recognition of speech in additive and convolutional noise based on RASTA spectral processing

    H. Hermansky;N. Morgan;H.-G. Hirsch

  • Generalization and Parameter Estimation in Feedforward Nets: Some Experiments

    N. Morgan;H. Bourlard

  • Connectionist probability estimators in HMM speech recognition

    S. Renals;N. Morgan;H. Bourlard;M. Cohen

  • Robust speech recognition using the modulation spectrogram

    Brian E. D. Kingsbury;Brian E. D. Kingsbury;Nelson Morgan;Nelson Morgan;Steven Greenberg;Steven Greenberg

  • Developments and directions in speech recognition and understanding, Part 1 [DSP Education]

    J. Baker;Li Deng;J. Glass;S. Khudanpur

  • Continuous speech recognition

    N. Morgan;H. Bourlard

  • Compensation for the effect of the communication channel in auditory-like analysis of speech (RASTA-PLP).

    Hynek Hermansky;Nelson Morgan;Aruna Bayya;Phil Kohn

  • Continuous speech recognition using multilayer perceptrons with hidden Markov models

    N. Morgan;H. Bourlard

  • The challenge of spoken language systems: Research directions for the nineties

    R. Cole;L. Hirschman;L. Atlas;M. Beckman

  • Towards increasing speech recognition error rates

    Hervé Bourlard;Hervé Bourlard;Hynek Hermansky;Hynek Hermansky;Nelson Morgan;Nelson Morgan

  • Speech and Audio Signal Processing

    Simon King;Dan Ellis;Nelson Morgan

  • Brain wave source network location scanning method and system

    Alan S. Gevins;Nelson H. Morgan;Douglas S. Greer

  • Event-related covariances during a bimanual visuomotor task. I. Methods and analysis of stimulus- and response-locked data

    A.S. Gevins;S.L. Bressler;N.H. Morgan;B.A. Cutillo

  • Human Neuroelectric Patterns Predict Performance Accuracy

    Alan S. Gevins;Nelson H. Morgan;Steven L. Bressler;Brian A. Cutillo

  • 8. Pattern Classification

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Hervé Bourlard
Hervé Bourlard Idiap Research Institute
Daniel P. W. Ellis
Daniel P. W. Ellis Google (United States)
Hynek Hermansky
Hynek Hermansky Johns Hopkins University
Alan Gevins
Alan Gevins San Francicso Brain Research Institute & SAM Technology
Brian Kingsbury
Brian Kingsbury IBM (United States)
John Wawrzynek
John Wawrzynek University of California, Berkeley
Krste Asanovic
Krste Asanovic University of California, Berkeley
Horacio Franco
Horacio Franco SRI International
Chuck Wooters
Chuck Wooters International Computer Science Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring diverse educational and professional routes is important when considering a Computer Science degree in the USA. Today, online degrees offer incredible flexibility for busy students and working adults.

For example, an online physics bachelor's degree can help you build a strong analytical foundation for careers in technology, data, and engineering. Similarly, data science programs teach crucial skills in statistics and machine learning, helping graduates fill in-demand roles in a rapidly growing field.

Beyond computer science, an electrical engineering degree online admissions process offers more tech-focused options—opening doors in industries like robotics, telecommunications, and automation.

If you’re interested in quick career advancement, consider earning certifications for jobs that pay well. These targeted credentials can boost your résumé and help you qualify for high-paying technology roles without the time commitment of a full degree.

Best Scientists Citing Nelson Morgan

Trending Scientists