World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2952 2705 1432 1293 140 9608
Engineering and Technology 49 4294 4128 1233 1137 140 9595

Matthew R. Hallowell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew R. Hallowell between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew R. Hallowell published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2013. 17 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2013. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 11 publications
2005 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew R. Hallowell: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 9
2010 9
2011 6
2012 9
2013 16
2014 6
2015 7
2016 13
2017 10
2018 11
2019 7
2020 12
2021 6
2022 3
2023 5
2024 6
2025 11
Total 150
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Hallowell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Hallowell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 140
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Hallowell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Hallowell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew R. Hallowell is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on the fields of Health Professions and Decision Sciences, with specific emphasis on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, and Medical Laboratory Technology.

Their work encompasses key topics including Occupational Health and Safety Research, Risk and Safety Analysis, Construction Project Management and Performance, Safety Warnings and Signage, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Quality and Safety in Healthcare, and Traffic and Road Safety.

Hallowell has frequently published in several academic venues, with the most numerous contributions in the Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Safety Science, Construction Research Congress 2020, Construction Research Congress 2022, and the Journal of Safety Research.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Identifying and Controlling Biases in Expert-Opinion Research: Guidelines for Variations of Delphi, Nominal Group Technique, and Focus Groups, 2021, Journal of Management in Engineering
  • Influence of Safety Climate on Risk Tolerance and Risk-Taking Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Examination, 2021, Safety Science
  • Practical Assessment of Potential Predictors of Serious Injuries and Fatalities in Construction, 2021, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
  • Perceptions of Construction Work: Views to Consider to Improve Employee Recruitment and Retention, 2021, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
  • Safety Risk Tolerance in the Construction Industry: Cross-Cultural Analysis, 2020, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

Frequent collaborators in Hallowell's research include Siddharth Bhandari, Fred Sherratt, Logan Perry, Sreeja Thallapureddy, and Steven K. Ayer. These partnerships have contributed to numerous interdisciplinary projects and publications.

Best Publications

  • Qualitative Research: Application of the Delphi Method to CEM Research

    Matthew R. Hallowell;Matthew R. Hallowell;John A. Gambatese;John A. Gambatese

  • Wearable technology for personalized construction safety monitoring and trending: Review of applicable devices

    Ibukun Awolusi;Eric Marks;Matthew Hallowell

  • Application of machine learning to construction injury prediction

    Antoine J.-P. Tixier;Matthew R. Hallowell;Balaji Rajagopalan;Dean Bowman

  • Construction Safety Risk Mitigation

    Matthew R. Hallowell;Matthew R. Hallowell;John A. Gambatese;John A. Gambatese

  • Automated content analysis for construction safety: A natural language processing system to extract precursors and outcomes from unstructured injury reports

    Antoine J.-P. Tixier;Matthew R. Hallowell;Balaji Rajagopalan;Dean Bowman

  • Enhancing construction hazard recognition with high-fidelity augmented virtuality

    Alex Albert;Matthew R. Hallowell;Brian Kleiner;Ao Chen

  • Proactive Construction Safety Control: Measuring, Monitoring, and Responding to Safety Leading Indicators

    Matthew R. Hallowell;Jimmie W. Hinze;Kevin C. Baud;Andrew Wehle

  • Enabling and measuring innovation in the construction industry

    John A. Gambatese;Matthew Hallowell

  • Relationship between Construction Safety and Quality Performance

    John Wanberg;Christofer Harper;Matthew R. Hallowell;Sathyanarayanan Rajendran

  • Activity-Based Safety Risk Quantification for Concrete Formwork Construction

    Matthew R. Hallowell;Matthew R. Hallowell;John A. Gambatese;John A. Gambatese

  • Construction-Safety Best Practices and Relationships to Safety Performance

    Jimmie Hinze;Matthew Hallowell;Kevin Baud

  • Measuring and modelling safety communication in small work crews in the US using social network analysis

    Rayyan Alsamadani;Matthew Hallowell;Amy Nicole Javernick-Will

  • Enhancing Construction Hazard Recognition and Communication with Energy-Based Cognitive Mnemonics and Safety Meeting Maturity Model: Multiple Baseline Study

    Alex Albert;Matthew R. Hallowell;Brian M. Kleiner

  • Safety risk perception in construction companies in the Pacific Northwest of the USA

    Matthew Hallowell

  • Leading or lagging? Temporal analysis of safety indicators on a large infrastructure construction project

    Helen Lingard;Matthew Hallowell;Rico Salas;Payam Pirzadeh

  • Safety climate dimensions and their relationship to construction safety performance: A meta-analytic review

    Wael M. Alruqi;Matthew R. Hallowell;Ulises Techera

  • Factors that influence the development and diffusion of technical innovations in the construction industry

    John A. Gambatese;Matthew Hallowell

  • Safety-Knowledge Management in American Construction Organizations

    Matthew R. Hallowell

  • Identification of Safety Risks for High-Performance Sustainable Construction Projects

    Bernard R. Fortunato;Matthew R. Hallowell;Michael Behm;Katie Dewlaney

  • Causes and Consequences of Occupational Fatigue: Meta-Analysis and Systems Model.

    Ulises Techera;Matthew Hallowell;Nathan Stambaugh;Ray Littlejohn

  • Identifying construction supervisor competencies for effective site safety

    Dylan Hardison;Michael Behm;Matthew R. Hallowell;Hamid Fonooni

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Gambatese
John A. Gambatese Oregon State University
Keith R. Molenaar
Keith R. Molenaar University of Colorado Boulder
Balaji Rajagopalan
Balaji Rajagopalan University of Colorado Boulder
Leaf Van Boven
Leaf Van Boven University of Colorado Boulder
Mani Golparvar-Fard
Mani Golparvar-Fard University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
June Gruber
June Gruber University of Colorado Boulder
Jimmie Hinze
Jimmie Hinze University of Florida
Helen Lingard
Helen Lingard RMIT University
Joshua Correll
Joshua Correll University of Colorado Boulder
Michalis Vazirgiannis
Michalis Vazirgiannis École Polytechnique

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right online degree can open doors to diverse career paths across Social Sciences and Humanities. Flexible formats, such as online master programs, allow students to specialize quickly, often within a single year, while managing other responsibilities.

For those seeking a faster undergraduate route, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees offer the chance to start your professional journey sooner. These programs can be a cost-effective solution and reduce time spent out of the workforce.

A career in social work remains a popular choice for Social Sciences majors. Students can consider the cheapest online msw programs to prepare for licensure and make a real impact in communities, all while keeping tuition costs manageable.

For those interested in behavioral analysis or special education, earning a bcba certification can pave the way to specialized roles. Online study options make it easier to balance certification coursework with existing commitments and can lead to rewarding careers helping individuals and families thrive.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew R. Hallowell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles