World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 49 657 605 213 182 208 8376

R.C. Cochran publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by R.C. Cochran between 1975 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. R.C. Cochran published across 48 years, from 1975 to 2022, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1991. 1 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1975 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 1991. 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 4 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 7 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 19 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1975 2022

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
R.C. Cochran: publications per year, 1975 to 2022
Year Publications
1975 1
1976 2
1977 0
1978 1
1979 4
1980 1
1981 1
1982 1
1983 4
1984 2
1985 2
1986 4
1987 7
1988 7
1989 9
1990 14
1991 19
1992 7
1993 10
1994 11
1995 12
1996 12
1997 11
1998 11
1999 9
2000 3
2001 7
2002 7
2003 5
2004 7
2005 4
2006 3
2007 4
2008 4
2009 1
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 0
2022 1
Total 214
Download as CSV

R.C. Cochran publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.C. Cochran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–208 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 208 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31 208
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

R.C. Cochran D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R.C. Cochran sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47 49
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

R.C. Cochran is affiliated with Kansas State University in the United States. Their recent scholarly activity includes contributions to literary and cultural studies, as evidenced by their publication record.

Their most recent paper, published in 2022, is titled Semester of the Women: Reading Grace Paley in Quarantine. This work appeared in The Missouri Review, a venue where Cochran has contributed at least once.

  • Semester of the Women: Reading Grace Paley in Quarantine (2022), The Missouri Review

Their publication venues include:

  • The Missouri Review

No co-authors have been frequently associated with Cochran's publications as per available data.

Best Publications

  • Predicting Digestibility of Different Diets with Internal Markers: Evaluation of Four Potential Markers

    Unknown

  • Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation

    Eric S. Vanzant;Robert C. Cochran;Evan C. Titgemeyer

  • Effect of increasing degradable intake protein on intake and digestion of low-quality, tallgrass-prairie forage by beef cows

    H H Köster;R C Cochran;E C Titgemeyer;E S Vanzant

  • Vegetation trends in tallgrass prairie from bison and cattle grazing

    E. Gene Towne;David C. Hartnett;Robert C. Cochran

  • Effect of frequency of supplementation and protein concentration in supplements on performance and digestion characteristics of beef cattle consuming low-quality forages.

    J. L. Beaty;R. C. Cochran;B. A. Lintzenich;E. S. Vanzant

  • Effects of supplemental degradable intake protein on utilization of medium- to low-quality forages

    C. P. Mathis;R. C. Cochran;J. S. Heldt;B. C. Woods

  • Influence of dietary energy on follicular development, serum gonadotropins, and first postpartum ovulation in suckled beef cows.

    R C Perry;L R Corah;R C Cochran;W E Beal

  • Effects of ruminal administration of supplemental degradable intake protein and starch on utilization of low-quality warm-season grass hay by beef steers.

    K C Olson;R C Cochran;T J Jones;E S Vanzant

  • Supplementation of dormant tallgrass-prairie forage: I. Influence of varying supplemental protein and(or) energy levels on forage utilization characteristics of beef steers in confinement.

    T. DelCurto;R. C. Cochran;D. L. Harmon;A. A. Beharka

  • Effects of different supplemental sugars and starch fed in combination with degradable intake protein on low-quality forage use by beef steers.

    J S Heldt;R C Cochran;G L Stokka;C G Farmer

  • Influence of timing of gain on growth and reproductive performance of beef replacement heifers

    J M Lynch;G C Lamb;B L Miller;R T Brandt

  • Effects of calcium soaps of fatty acids on postpartum reproductive function in beef cows.

    R B Hightshoe;R C Cochran;L R Corah;G H Kiracofe

  • Influence of protein supplementation on site and extent of digestion, forage intake, and nutrient flow characteristics in steers consuming dormant bluestem-range forage

    S M Hannah;R C Cochran;E S Vanzant;D L Harmon

  • Effect of ruminal vs postruminal administration of degradable protein on utilization of low-quality forage by beef steers.

    C A Bandyk;R C Cochran;T A Wickersham;E C Titgemeyer

  • Performance and forage utilization by beef cattle receiving increasing amounts of alfalfa hay as a supplement to low-quality, tallgrass-prairie forage.

    E S Vanzant;R C Cochran

  • In situ dry matter, nitrogen, and fiber degradation of alfalfa, red clover, and eastern gamagrass at four maturities.

    W.K. Coblentz;J.O. Fritz;W.H. Fick;R.C. Cochran

  • Effect of rumen-degradable intake protein supplementation on urea kinetics and microbial use of recycled urea in steers consuming low-quality forage.

    T. A. Wickersham;E. C. Titgemeyer;R. C. Cochran;E. E. Wickersham

  • In vivo and in situ measurements of forage protein degradation in beef cattle.

    E S Vanzant;R C Cochran;E C Titgemeyer;S D Stafford

  • Technical note: evaluation of acid detergent lignin, alkaline peroxide lignin, acid insoluble ash, and indigestible acid detergent fiber as internal markers for prediction of alfalfa, bromegrass, and prairie hay digestibility by beef steers.

    G D Sunvold;R C Cochran

  • Supplementation of dormant tallgrass-prairie forage: II. Performance and forage utilization characteristics in grazing beef cattle receiving supplements of different protein concentrations.

    T. DelCurto;R. C. Cochran;L. R. Corah;A. A. Beharka

  • Effects of level and source of carbohydrate and level of degradable intake protein on intake and digestion of low-quality tallgrass-prairie hay by beef steers.

    J S Heldt;R C Cochran;C P Mathis;B C Woods

  • Steam-rolled wheat diets for finishing cattle: effects of dietary roughage and feed intake on finishing steer performance and ruminal metabolism.

    K K Kreikemeier;D L Harmon;R T Brandt;T G Nagaraja

  • Degradability of forage proteins by in situ and in vitro enzymatic methods.

    W.K. Coblentz;I.E.O. Abdelgadir;R.C. Cochran;J.O. Fritz

  • Effect of increasing proportion of supplemental nitrogen from urea on intake and utilization of low-quality, tallgrass-prairie forage by beef steers

    H H Köster;R C Cochran;E C Titgemeyer;E S Vanzant

  • The effects of several supplementation frequencies on forage use and the performance of beef cattle consuming dormant tallgrass prairie forage.

    C G Farmer;R C Cochran;D D Simms;E A Klevesahl

  • Protein degradation in response to spontaneous heating in alfalfa hay by in situ and ficin methods

    W.K. Coblentz;J.O. Fritz;R.C. Cochran;W.L. Rooney

Frequent Co-Authors

Evan C. Titgemeyer
Evan C. Titgemeyer Kansas State University
Robert T. Brandt
Robert T. Brandt Kansas State University
Tiruvoor G. Nagaraja
Tiruvoor G. Nagaraja Kansas State University
Tryon A Wickersham
Tryon A Wickersham Texas A&M University
Clenton E. Owensby
Clenton E. Owensby Kansas State University
L.R. Corah
L.R. Corah Kansas State University
David C. Hartnett
David C. Hartnett Kansas State University
Eric S. Vanzant
Eric S. Vanzant University of Kentucky
Jeffrey S. Stevenson
Jeffrey S. Stevenson Kansas State University
J.L. Morrill
J.L. Morrill Kansas State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Animal Science and Veterinary studies opens the door to a variety of related careers in health, science, and education. Many students consider degrees that complement their interest in animal care, such as exercise science. Programs like those found in the exercise science degree online category offer flexible learning options that prepare graduates for roles in animal rehabilitation and wellness.

For those interested in behavioral aspects, certifications similar to the best bcba programs provide valuable training in applied behavior analysis, which can be applied to animal training and therapy careers.

Additionally, knowledge of psychology plays a key role in animal welfare. Online programs such as those highlighted in the online school psychology programs guide students through principles that can be adapted to animal behavior and mental health fields.

Career pathways from these degrees can lead to leadership roles that include managing facilities or programs related to animal care. Understanding the athletic director salary and career trajectories can provide insight into the administrative side of managing animal-focused sports or therapy programs.

Best Scientists Citing R.C. Cochran

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles