World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
György Benedek

György Benedek

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
6195
World Ranking
8539
National Ranking
35

György Benedek publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where György Benedek sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 195 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

György Benedek D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where György Benedek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

György Benedek is affiliated with the University of Szeged in Hungary and works primarily in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Medicine. The scientist's research spans several subfields, including Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Dermatology.

The main topics in György Benedek's work cover Genetic and rare skin diseases, Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies, Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders, Retinal Development and Disorders, Photoreceptor and optogenetics research, Retinal Diseases and Treatments, and Dermatologic Treatments and Research.

Recent publications include:

  • Immunohistochemical Analysis of a Vitreous Membrane Removed from a Patient with Incontinentia Pigmenti-Related Retinal Detachment, 2020, Vision
  • Long-Term Follow-Up of a Family with Retinal Dystrophy Caused by RPE65 Mutation, 2023, Case Reports in Ophthalmology
  • Retinal and optic nerve functions in incontinentia pigmenti: long-term elctrophysiological follow-up, 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with György Benedek include Márta Janáky, Ágnes Jánossy, Dóra Török, Dóra Nagy, and A Kovãcs.

Publications are often found in venues such as Vision, Case Reports in Ophthalmology, and Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science.

Best Publications

  • Late maturation of visual spatial integration in humans.

    Ilona Kovács;Petra Kozma;Ákos Fehér;György Benedek

  • Physiologic and anatomic investigation of a visual cortical area situated in the ventral bank of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus of the cat

    L. Mucke;M. Norita;G. Benedek;O. Creutzfeldt

  • Different trait markers for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a neurocognitive approach.

    S. Kéri;O. Kelemen;G. Benedek;Z. Janka

  • Multisensory integration in the basal ganglia

    Attila Nagy;Gabriella Eördegh;Zsuzsanna Paróczy;Zita Márkus

  • Spatiotemporal visual processing in schizophrenia.

    Szabolcs Kéri;Andrea Antal;György Szekeres;György Benedek

  • No evidence for impaired ‘theory of mind’ in unaffected first‐degree relatives of schizophrenia patients

    O. Kelemen;S. Kéri;A. Must;G. Benedek

  • Theory of mind and motion perception in schizophrenia.

    Oguz Kelemen;Rita Erdélyi;Ilona Pataki;György Benedek

  • Schizophrenics know more than they can tell: probabilistic classification learning in schizophrenia.

    Szaboles Kéri;O. Kelemen;G. Szekeres;N. Bagóczky

  • Retinal dysfunctions in schizophrenia

    Zita Balogh;György Benedek;Szabolcs Kéri

  • Vernier threshold in patients with schizophrenia and in their unaffected siblings.

    Szabolcs Kéri;Oguz Kelemen;György Benedek;Zoltán Janka

  • Oxytocin enhances the perception of biological motion in humans.

    Szabolcs Kéri;György Benedek

  • The scotopic low-frequency spatial contrast sensitivity develops in children between the ages of 5 and 14 years.

    György Benedek;Krisztina Benedek;Szabolcs Kéri;Márta Janáky

  • Probabilistic classification learning in Tourette syndrome.

    Szabolcs Kéri;Csaba Szlobodnyik;György Benedek;Zoltán Janka

  • Reduced facilitation effect of collinear flankers on contrast detection reveals impaired lateral connectivity in the visual cortex of schizophrenia patients.

    Anita Must;Zoltán Janka;György Benedek;Szabolcs Kéri

  • The role of TRPV1 receptors in the antinociceptive effect of anandamide at spinal level

    Gyöngyi Horvath;Gabriella Kekesi;Edit Nagy;György Benedek

  • Early and late components of visual categorization: an event-related potential study.

    Andrea Antal;Szabolcs Kéri;Gyula Kovács;Zoltán Janka

  • The synergistic antinociceptive interactions of endomorphin-1 with dexmedetomidine and/or S(+)-ketamine in rats.

    Gyöngyi Horvath;Gabriella Joo;Ildiko Dobos;Walter Klimscha

  • Anomalous visual experiences, negative symptoms, perceptual organization and the magnocellular pathway in schizophrenia: a shared construct?

    Szabolcs Kéri;Imre Kiss;Oguz Kelemen;György Benedek

  • Visual, somatosensory, auditory and nociceptive modality properties in the feline suprageniculate nucleus

    G Benedek;J Perény;G Kovács;L Fischer-Szátmári

  • Anterior ectosylvian visual area (AEV) of the cat: physiological properties.

    G. Benedek;L. Mucke;M. Norita;B. Albowitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Szabolcs Kéri
Szabolcs Kéri Budapest University of Technology and Economics
László Vécsei
László Vécsei University of Szeged
Sándor Beniczky
Sándor Beniczky Aarhus University Hospital
Gyula Kovács
Gyula Kovács Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Andrea Antal
Andrea Antal University of Göttingen
Bogdan Dreher
Bogdan Dreher University of Sydney
Ferenc Bari
Ferenc Bari University of Szeged
Ian Hindmarch
Ian Hindmarch University of Surrey
Helen F.K. Chiu
Helen F.K. Chiu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Matti Laine
Matti Laine Åbo Akademi University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience often opens doors to a wide array of related fields and educational opportunities. Many students interested in neuroscience also consider programs like online psyd programs apa accredited, which offer a path to careers in clinical psychology and specialized mental health services through flexible online options.

For those looking to focus on therapy and counseling, mft accredited programs can be an excellent choice. These programs provide in-depth training in family and marriage therapy, and many are structured for online learning, making them accessible to busy professionals.

If accelerating your education is important, consider enrolling in accelerated bachelors degrees. These programs allow students to complete their studies faster, helping them enter the workforce or continue with graduate training sooner.

Finally, understanding the potential return on investment is essential. Check out the best degree in the world to discover which fields offer the highest earning potential. By broadening your scope, you can align your neuroscience interests with degrees that offer diverse and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing György Benedek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles