World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen G. Lomber

Stephen G. Lomber

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
52
Citations
9184
World Ranking
5352
National Ranking
313

Stephen G. Lomber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen G. Lomber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 206 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephen G. Lomber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen G. Lomber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen G. Lomber is a researcher affiliated with McGill University in Canada. Their primary field of study is Neuroscience, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics in their work include neural dynamics and brain function, multisensory perception and integration, tactile and sensory interactions, olfactory and sensory function studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, visual perception and processing mechanisms, and animal vocal communication and behavior.

Frequent publication venues for Stephen G. Lomber's research include NeuroImage, European Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Vision, and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Stephen G. Lomber include:

  • Transient deactivation of dorsal premotor cortex or parietal area 5 impairs feedback control of the limb in macaques, 2021, Current Biology
  • Parietal Cortex Regulates Visual Salience and Salience-Driven Behavior, 2020, Neuron
  • Do blind people hear better?, 2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • Frontal eye field inactivation alters the readout of superior colliculus activity for saccade generation in a task-dependent manner, 2020, Journal of Computational Neuroscience
  • Impairment but not abolishment of express saccades after unilateral or bilateral inactivation of the frontal eye fields, 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology

Stephen G. Lomber frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Yaser Merrikhi, Stephen G Gordon, Alessandra Sacco, M. Alex Meredith, and Xiaohan Bao.

Best Publications

  • Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons

    J. M. Hupé;A. C. James;B. R. Payne;S. G. Lomber

  • Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf

    Stephen G Lomber;M Alex Meredith;Andrej Kral

  • Feedback Connections Act on the Early Part of the Responses in Monkey Visual Cortex

    Jean-Michel Hupé;Andrew C. James;Pascal Girard;Stephen G. Lomber

  • Double dissociation of 'what' and 'where' processing in auditory cortex

    Stephen G Lomber;Shveta Malhotra

  • The cryoloop: an adaptable reversible cooling deactivation method for behavioral or electrophysiological assessment of neural function.

    Stephen G. Lomber;Bertram R. Payne;James A. Horel

  • The advantages and limitations of permanent or reversible deactivation techniques in the assessment of neural function.

    Stephen G Lomber

  • Corticocortical Feedback Contributes to Surround Suppression in V1 of the Alert Primate

    Jonathan J. Nassi;Stephen G. Lomber;Richard T. Born

  • Cortical Control of Sound Localization in the Cat: Unilateral Cooling Deactivation of 19 Cerebral Areas

    Shveta Malhotra;Amee J. Hall;Stephen G. Lomber

  • Removal of two halves restores the whole: reversal of visual hemineglect during bilateral cortical or collicular inactivation in the cat.

    Stephen G. Lomber;Bertram R. Payne

  • Impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal cortex on metabolic brain activity: a 14C-2DG tracing study in the cat.

    Antoni Valero-Cabré;Antoni Valero-Cabré;Bertram R. Payne;Jarrett Rushmore;Stephen G. Lomber

  • Crossmodal reorganization in the early deaf switches sensory, but not behavioral roles of auditory cortex.

    M. Alex Meredith;James Kryklywy;Amee J. McMillan;Shveta Malhotra

  • Reversible deactivation of cerebral network components

    Betram R Payne;Stephen G Lomber;Stephen G Lomber;Stephen G Lomber;Alessandro E Villa;Alessandro E Villa;Alessandro E Villa;Jean Bullier;Jean Bullier;Jean Bullier

  • Somatosensory and visual crossmodal plasticity in the anterior auditory field of early-deaf cats.

    M. Alex Meredith;Stephen G. Lomber

  • The role of feedback in shaping neural representations in cat visual cortex.

    Ralf A. W. Galuske;Kerstin E. Schmidt;Rainer Goebel;Stephen G. Lomber

  • Thalamic and cortical projections to middle suprasylvian cortex of cats: constancy and variation.

    Margaret A. MacNeil;Stephen G. Lomber;Bertram R. Payne

  • Integrating motion and depth via parallel pathways.

    Carlos R Ponce;Stephen G Lomber;Richard T Born

  • Reconstructing functional systems after lesions of cerebral cortex

    Bertram R. Payne;Stephen G. Lomber

  • Reversible visual hemineglect.

    B R Payne;S G Lomber;S Geeraerts;E van der Gucht

  • Functional and structural changes throughout the auditory system following congenital and early-onset deafness: implications for hearing restoration

    Blake E. Butler;Stephen G. Lomber

  • Role of the superior colliculus in analyses of space: superficial and intermediate layer contributions to visual orienting, auditory orienting, and visuospatial discriminations during unilateral and bilateral deactivations.

    Stephen G. Lomber;Bertram R. Payne;Paul Cornwell

  • Sound localization during homotopic and heterotopic bilateral cooling deactivation of primary and nonprimary auditory cortical areas in the cat.

    Shveta Malhotra;Stephen G. Lomber

Frequent Co-Authors

Bertram R. Payne
Bertram R. Payne Boston University
Brian D. Corneil
Brian D. Corneil University of Western Ontario
M. Alex Meredith
M. Alex Meredith Virginia Commonwealth University
Stefan Everling
Stefan Everling University of Western Ontario
Claus C. Hilgetag
Claus C. Hilgetag University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Jean Bullier
Jean Bullier Grenoble Alpes University
Richard T. Born
Richard T. Born Harvard University
Rainer Goebel
Rainer Goebel Maastricht University
Wim Vanduffel
Wim Vanduffel Harvard University
Antoni Valero-Cabré
Antoni Valero-Cabré Sorbonne University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stephen G. Lomber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles