World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
14003
World Ranking
3386
National Ranking
361

Ian Hindmarch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Hindmarch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 300 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ian Hindmarch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Hindmarch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ian Hindmarch is affiliated with the University of Surrey in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile features contributions to research without specified recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, or book publications documented in the available data.

No detailed information is provided on their primary fields or subfields of study, limiting insight into the specific areas of expertise or topics addressed in their research.

There is also no record of awards or honors associated with their academic career in the provided information. This profile consists solely of confirmed data without speculative additions beyond the verified scope.

Best Publications

  • World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Pharmacological Treatment of Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders – First Revision

    Borwin Bandelow;Josef Zohar;Eric Hollander;Siegfried Kasper

  • Psychomotor Function and Psychoactive Drugs

    Ian Hindmarch

  • The Bayer Activities of Daily Living Scale (B-ADL).

    I. Hindmarch;H. Lehfeld;P. de Jongh;H. Erzigkeit

  • The Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire in psychopharmacological investigations - a review.

    A. C. Parrott;I. Hindmarch

  • A naturalistic investigation of the effects of day-long consumption of tea, coffee and water on alertness, sleep onset and sleep quality.

    I Hindmarch;U Rigney;N Stanley;P Quinlan

  • Factor analysis of a sleep evaluation questionnaire.

    A. C. Parrott;Ian Hindmarch

  • Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of discontinuation rates

    Montgomery Sa;Henry J;McDonald G;Dinan T

  • Safety and tolerability considerations: tricyclic antidepressants vs. selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

    S. Peretti;R. Judge;I. Hindmarch

  • THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS ON PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE AND COGNITIVE FUNCTION

    Ian Hindmarch;J. S. Kerr;N. Sherwood

  • A double-blind study in healthy volunteers to assess the effects on sleep of pregabalin compared with alprazolam and placebo.

    Ian Hindmarch;Jean Dawson;Neil Stanley

  • Absence of discontinuation symptoms with agomelatine and occurrence of discontinuation symptoms with paroxetine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation study.

    S. A. Montgomery;S. H. Kennedy;G. D. Burrows;M. Lejoyeux

  • Critical Flicker Fusion Frequency (CFF): The Effects of Psychotropic Compounds

    I. Hindmarch

  • The Alzheimer's disease activities of daily living international scale (ADL-IS).

    Barry Reisberg;Sanford Finkel;John Overall;Norbert Schmidt-Gollas

  • Separate and combined effects of the social drugs on psychomotor performance.

    J. S. Kerr;N. Sherwood;Ian Hindmarch

  • The effects of clobazam and lorazepam on aspects of psychomotor performance and car handling ability.

    I Hindmarch;AC Gudgeon

  • Expanding the horizons of depression: beyond the monoamine hypothesis.

    I. Hindmarch

  • The Bayer-Activities of Daily Living Scale (B-ADL): Results from a Validation Study in Three European Countries

    Hellmut Erzigkeit;Hartmut Lehfeld;Jordi Peña-Casanova;Florian Bieber

  • Beyond the monoamine hypothesis: mechanisms, molecules and methods

    Unknown

  • Antihistamines: models to assess sedative properties, assessment of sedation, safety and other side‐effects

    Unknown

  • A double-blind, placebo- and positive-internal-controlled (alprazolam) investigation of the cognitive and psychomotor profile of pregabalin in healthy volunteers

    Ian Hindmarch;Leanne Trick;Fran Ridout

  • Sedation and antihistamines: a review of inter-drug differences using proportional impairment ratios.

    Z Shamsi;I Hindmarch

  • The effects of black tea and other beverages on aspects of cognition and psychomotor performance

    I. Hindmarch;P. T. Quinlan;K. L. Moore;C. Parkin

  • Cognition and depression: the effects of fluvoxamine, a sigma-1 receptor agonist, reconsidered.

    Ian Hindmarch;Kenji Hashimoto

Frequent Co-Authors

Anders Wallin
Anders Wallin University of Gothenburg
Ian G. McKeith
Ian G. McKeith Newcastle University
Martin Eisemann
Martin Eisemann University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Helen F.K. Chiu
Helen F.K. Chiu Chinese University of Hong Kong
L. von Knorring
L. von Knorring Uppsala University
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Elke Kalbe
Elke Kalbe University of Vechta
Steffen Moritz
Steffen Moritz University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Brent J. Small
Brent J. Small University of South Florida
Peter St George-Hyslop
Peter St George-Hyslop Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to various online degrees and rewarding career pathways. Many students with a psychology background choose to transition into social work, which has its own set of educational and licensure requirements depending on the state.

For example, the path to becoming a social worker in Louisiana involves completing a Council on Social Work Education (CSWE)-accredited program and passing a state licensure exam. If you are considering moving to Maine, understanding the requirements to be a social worker in Maine is essential, as different license types depend on your degree level and professional experience.

Meanwhile, if you plan to work in Maryland or Massachusetts, you must review the requirements to be a social worker in Maryland or learn how to become a social worker in Massachusetts. Each state may have specific coursework, supervised practice, and exam expectations.

By researching state-specific pathways and accredited online programs, you can find the right degree and career fit in the diverse field of social work and psychology in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Ian Hindmarch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles