World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 51 2561 2336 180 171 175 11562

Simone Reppermund publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Simone Reppermund between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Simone Reppermund published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2016. 18 of the 203 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2016. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 10 publications
2005 2025

203 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Simone Reppermund: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 0
2007 7
2008 4
2009 4
2010 6
2011 13
2012 16
2013 19
2014 10
2015 13
2016 21
2017 14
2018 9
2019 14
2020 4
2021 13
2022 10
2023 7
2024 8
2025 10
Total 203
Download as CSV

Simone Reppermund publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simone Reppermund sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 175 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 175
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Simone Reppermund D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Simone Reppermund sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166 51
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Simone Reppermund is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia, where their research primarily spans the field of Medicine with a specific focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, and Physiology.

Their work covers a broad range of topics, including:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Down Syndrome and Intellectual Disability Research
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Representative recent papers by Simone Reppermund include:

  • Prevalence and incidence of physical health conditions in people with intellectual disability - a systematic review, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Associations between nutrition and the incidence of depression in middle-aged and older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational population-based studies, 2021, Ageing Research Reviews
  • The aging mind: A complex challenge for research and practice, 2022, Aging Brain
  • Instrumental Activities of Daily Living by Subjective and Objective Measures: The Impact of Depression and Personality, 2022, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Public mental health service use by people with intellectual disability in New South Wales and its costs, 2021, The Medical Journal of Australia

Frequent co-authors in Simone Reppermund's research collaborations include:

  • Julian N. Trollor
  • Henry Brodaty
  • Perminder S. Sachdev
  • Preeyaporn Srasuebkul
  • Karen A. Mather

Their publications have appeared in several key venues with multiple contributions, such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Common genetic variants influence human subcortical brain structures.

    Derrek P. Hibar;Jason L. Stein;Jason L. Stein;Miguel E. Renteria;Alejandro Arias-Vasquez

  • The genetic architecture of the human cerebral cortex

    Katrina L. Grasby;Neda Jahanshad;Jodie N. Painter;Lucía Colodro-Conde

  • Study of 300,486 individuals identifies 148 independent genetic loci influencing general cognitive function

    Gail Davies;Max Lam;Sarah E. Harris;Joey W. Trampush

  • Genetic contributions to variation in general cognitive function: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies in the CHARGE consortium (N=53 949)

    G. Davies;N. Armstrong;J. C. Bis;J. Bressler

  • The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study (MAS): methodology and baseline medical and neuropsychiatric characteristics of an elderly epidemiological non-demented cohort of Australians aged 70-90 years.

    Perminder S. Sachdev;Henry Brodaty;Simone Reppermund;Nicole A. Kochan

  • Novel genetic loci associated with hippocampal volume

    Derrek Hibar;Hieab H.H. Adams;Neda Jahanshad;Ganesh Chauhan

  • The Prevalence of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Diverse Geographical and Ethnocultural Regions: The COSMIC Collaboration

    Perminder S. Sachdev;Darren M. Lipnicki;Nicole A. Kochan;John D. Crawford

  • Cognitive impairment in unipolar depression is persistent and non-specific: further evidence for the final common pathway disorder hypothesis

    S. Reppermund;M. Ising;S. Lucae;J. Zihl

  • Genetic architecture of subcortical brain structures in 38,851 individuals

    Claudia L. Satizabal;Claudia L. Satizabal;Claudia L. Satizabal;Hieab H.H. Adams;Derrek Hibar;Charles C. White;Charles C. White

  • Overweight and Obesity Affect Treatment Response in Major Depression

    Stefan Kloiber;Marcus Ising;Simone Reppermund;Sonja Horstmann

  • Novel genetic loci underlying human intracranial volume identified through genome-wide association

    Hieab H H Adams;Derrek P. Hibar;Vincent Chouraki;Vincent Chouraki;Vincent Chouraki;Jason L. Stein;Jason L. Stein

  • Discrete Neuroanatomical Networks Are Associated with Specific Cognitive Abilities in Old Age

    Wei Wen;Wanlin Zhu;Yong He;Nicole A Kochan

  • Inflammatory biomarkers predict depressive, but not anxiety symptoms during aging: the prospective Sydney Memory and Aging Study.

    B.T. Baune;E. Smith;S. Reppermund;T. Air

  • Age-related cognitive decline and associations with sex, education and apolipoprotein E genotype across ethnocultural groups and geographic regions: a collaborative cohort study

    Darren M Lipnicki;John D Crawford;Rajib Dutta;Anbupalam Thalamuthu

  • Barriers and Enablers to Accessing Mental Health Services for People With Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review

    Erin Louise Whittle;Karen R. Fisher;Simone Reppermund;Rhoshel Lenroot

  • Mild cognitive impairment in a community sample: The Sydney Memory and Ageing Study

    Henry Brodaty;Megan Heffernan;Nicole A. Kochan;Brian Draper

  • Persistent cognitive impairment in depression: the role of psychopathology and altered hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system regulation

    Simone Reppermund;Josef Zihl;Susanne Lucae;Sonja Horstmann

  • Factors predicting reversion from mild cognitive impairment to normal cognitive functioning: a population-based study.

    Perminder S. Sachdev;Darren M. Lipnicki;John Crawford;Simone Reppermund

  • Impairment in instrumental activities of daily living with high cognitive demand is an early marker of mild cognitive impairment: the Sydney memory and ageing study

    S. Reppermund;H. Brodaty;J. D. Crawford;N. A. Kochan

  • The relationship of neuropsychological function to instrumental activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment.

    Simone Reppermund;Perminder S. Sachdev;John Crawford;Nicole A. Kochan

  • Microstructural white matter changes in cognitively normal individuals at risk of amnestic MCI

    Lin Zhuang;Perminder S. Sachdev;Julian N. Trollor;Nicole A. Kochan

Frequent Co-Authors

Perminder S. Sachdev
Perminder S. Sachdev University of New South Wales
Henry Brodaty
Henry Brodaty University of New South Wales
Julian N. Trollor
Julian N. Trollor University of New South Wales
Nicole A. Kochan
Nicole A. Kochan University of New South Wales
Melissa J. Slavin
Melissa J. Slavin University of New South Wales
Wei Wen
Wei Wen University of New South Wales
John B.J. Kwok
John B.J. Kwok University of Sydney
Peter R. Schofield
Peter R. Schofield Neuroscience Research Australia
Brian Draper
Brian Draper University of New South Wales
David Ames
David Ames University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to various rewarding career pathways. Many students are drawn to counseling, where obtaining a degree from cacrep accredited online masters counseling programs ensures a strong foundation in both theory and practice, meeting key professional standards.

For those interested in family dynamics and relationships, specialized online marriage and family therapy masters programs provide flexible learning for future therapists aiming to help couples and families navigate life’s challenges.

Psychology remains a popular pathway, especially due to increased demand for mental health professionals. Many learners seek the cheapest online degree in psychology to begin this journey, balancing affordability with academic excellence.

Social Work is another impactful field; with the rise of remote study, many students now look for the easiest online msw program to gain credentials for roles in community support, advocacy, and policy.

These flexible online options make it easier than ever to pursue careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work, fitting advanced study around your life.

Best Scientists Citing Simone Reppermund

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles