World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
9698
World Ranking
4079
National Ranking
25

Martin Eisemann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Eisemann sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 206 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martin Eisemann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Eisemann sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Eisemann is affiliated with the University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway and conducts research primarily in the field of computer science. Their work spans multiple subfields, including sociology and political science, cognitive neuroscience, statistics, probability and uncertainty, computer vision and pattern recognition, and food science.

The scientist's research frequently addresses topics such as risk perception and management, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, risk and safety analysis, food waste reduction and sustainability, advanced vision and imaging, computer graphics and visualization techniques, and remote sensing and LiDAR applications.

Their publication record includes articles in various venues, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach across psychology, computer graphics, and health sciences. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Covid-19 pandemic lessons: uncritical communication of test results can induce more harm than benefit and raises questions on standardized quality criteria for communication and liability," 2021, published in Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
  • "The Effect of a Knowledge-Based Intervention on the Use of Respirators in the Norwegian Smelter Industry," 2020, published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Next Event Estimation++: Visibility Mapping for Efficient Light Transport Simulation," 2020, published in Computer Graphics Forum
  • "Efficient Perspective-Correct 3D Gaussian Splatting Using Hybrid Transparency," 2024, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Covid-19 pandemic lessons: Uncritical communication of test results can induce more harm than benefit and raises questions on standardized quality criteria for communication and liability," 2020, published in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Eisemann has collaborated with several researchers across multiple disciplines. Frequent coauthors include Franz Porzsolt, Gerit Pfuhl, Robert M. Kaplan, Øystein Robertsen, and Marit Nøst Hegseth.

Their published work appears in venues such as Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Frontiers in Psychology, Computer Graphics Forum, arXiv (Cornell University), and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Best Publications

  • A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences

    Kristin Haraldstad;Astrid Klopstad Wahl;Randi Andenæs;John Roger Andersen

  • The development of a short form of the EMBU : Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy

    Willem A Arrindell;Ezio Sanavio;Guido Aguilar;Claudio Sica

  • Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Resilience Scale.

    Berit Lundman;Gunilla Strandberg;Martin Eisemann;Yngve Gustafson

  • Art therapy improves experienced quality of life among women undergoing treatment for breast cancer: a randomized controlled study

    Ann-Christine Svensk;Inger Öster;Karin Egberg Thyme;Eva Magnusson

  • Evaluating the effectiveness and efficacy of unguided internet‐based self‐help intervention for the prevention of depression: a randomized controlled trial

    Ove K. Lintvedt;Kathleen M. Griffiths;Kristian Sørensen;Andreas R. Østvik

  • PERCEIVED DEPRIVING PARENTAL REARING AND DEPRESSION

    C Perris;W A Arrindell;H Perris;M Eisemann

  • Temperament and character during the course of unipolar depression among inpatients.

    Jörg Richter;Martin Eisemann;Gabriele Richter

  • The clinical effectiveness of web-based cognitive behavioral therapy with face-to-face therapist support for depressed primary care patients: Randomized controlled trial

    Ragnhild Sørensen Høifødt;Kjersti R Lillevoll;Kathleen M Griffiths;Tom Wilsgaard

  • Stability of dysfunctional attitudes and early maladaptive schemas: a 9-year follow-up study of clinically depressed subjects.

    Catharina E.A. Wang;Marianne Halvorsen;Martin Eisemann;Knut Waterloo

  • Early maladaptive schemas, temperament and character traits in clinically depressed and previously depressed subjects.

    Marianne Halvorsen;Catharina E. Wang;Jörg Richter;Ine Myrland

  • Predictors and moderators of outcome in child and adolescent anxiety and depression: a systematic review of psychological treatment studies

    Toril Sørheim Nilsen;Martin Eisemann;Siv Kvernmo

  • Uptake and adherence of a self-directed internet-based mental health intervention with tailored e-mail reminders in senior high schools in Norway

    Kjersti R Lillevoll;Hans Christian B Vangberg;Kathleen M Griffiths;Knut Waterloo

  • Parenting and Psychopathology

    C. Perris;W. A. Arrindell;M. Eisemann;Dawn M. Anderson

  • Pain as a symptom in depressive disorders. I. Relationship to diagnostic subgroup and depressive symptomatology

    L. von Knorring;C. Perris;M. Eisemann;U. Eriksson

  • Motivation to persist with internet-based cognitive behavioural treatment using blended care: a qualitative study.

    Maja Wilhelmsen;Kjersti Lillevoll;Mette Bech Risør;Ragnhild Sørensen Høifødt

  • Staff's experience of and the management of violent incidents in elderly care

    Sture Aström;Stig Karlsson;Asa Sandvide;Gösta Bucht

  • Incidence of violence towards staff caring for the elderly.

    Sture Åström;Gösta Bucht;Martin Eisemann;Astrid Norberg

  • Dysfunctional Attitudes and Early Maladaptive Schemas as Predictors of Depression: A 9-Year Follow-Up Study

    Marianne Halvorsen;Catharina E. Wang;Martin Eisemann;Knut Waterloo

  • Own memories of upbringing as a determinant of prenatal attachment in expectant women

    A. Siddiqui;B. Hagglof;M. Eisemann

  • Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in primary health care: a review

    Ragnhild Sørensen Høifødt;Christine Strøm;Nils Kolstrup;Martin Eisemann

Frequent Co-Authors

L. von Knorring
L. von Knorring Uppsala University
Vladislav Ruchkin
Vladislav Ruchkin Uppsala University
Bruno Hägglöf
Bruno Hägglöf Umeå University
Jan van der Ende
Jan van der Ende Erasmus University Rotterdam
Willem A. Arrindell
Willem A. Arrindell University of Groningen
Claudio Sica
Claudio Sica University of Florence
Lars von Knorring
Lars von Knorring Uppsala University
Ian Hindmarch
Ian Hindmarch University of Surrey
Kathleen M Griffiths
Kathleen M Griffiths Australian National University
Fred R. Volkmar
Fred R. Volkmar Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Psychology and related counseling fields can open up diverse and rewarding career pathways. Online programs offer flexibility for both recent graduates and working professionals, helping more students access education across the USA. However, one of the main considerations is cost—many learners look for affordable options that deliver high-quality instruction without excessive student debt.

Prospective students can start by reviewing the cheapest online counseling degrees in Michigan, which provide accessible pathways for those residing in or near the Midwest. Similarly, learners in the Northeast may research the cheapest online counseling degrees in New York, or explore options in neighboring states with the cheapest online counseling degrees in Pennsylvania. For those specifically interested in urban opportunities, the most affordable online counseling degree programs ranking in Philadelphia offers targeted insights.

Choosing an affordable and accredited program is crucial. Students should also consider licensing requirements and internship opportunities, as these are essential for advancing careers in psychology, counseling, and mental health services.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Eisemann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles