World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
9307
World Ranking
4989
National Ranking
380

Doreen S. Boyd publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doreen S. Boyd sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 150 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Doreen S. Boyd D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Doreen S. Boyd sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Doreen S. Boyd is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science with a significant emphasis on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, and Environmental Engineering. Additional areas of study include Nature and Landscape Conservation and Atmospheric Science.

The scientist's work spans a variety of topics related to remote sensing and environmental monitoring. Key topics covered in their research include:

  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Fire Effects on Ecosystems
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Recent publications by Doreen S. Boyd demonstrate a focus on remote sensing technologies and forest ecology. Notable papers include:

  • Applications in Remote Sensing to Forest Ecology and Management (2020, One Earth)
  • Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission (2022, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Active restoration accelerates the carbon recovery of human-modified tropical forests (2020, Science)
  • Monitoring high spatiotemporal water dynamics by fusing MODIS, Landsat, water occurrence data and DEM (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Tracking small-scale tropical forest disturbances: Fusing the Landsat and Sentinel-2 data record (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)

Their frequent coauthors include several researchers with whom they have collaborated multiple times. These include Giles M. Foody, Sofie Sjögersten, Geertje van der Heijden, Chris J. Chandler, and Chloe Brown.

Doreen S. Boyd has published extensively in various scholarly venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
  • One Earth
  • Journal of Ecology

Best Publications

  • Predictive relations of tropical forest biomass from Landsat TM data and their transferability between regions

    Giles M. Foody;Doreen S. Boyd;Mark E.J. Cutler

  • Aboveground biomass density models for NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission

    Unknown

  • Mapping the biomass of Bornean tropical rain forest from remotely sensed data

    Giles M. Foody;Mark E. Cutler;Julia McMorrow;Dieter Pelz

  • Satellite remote sensing of forest resources: three decades of research development

    D. S. Boyd;F. M. Danson

  • Applications in Remote Sensing to Forest Ecology and Management

    Alex M. Lechner;Giles M. Foody;Doreen S. Boyd

  • Training set size requirements for the classification of a specific class

    Giles M. Foody;Ajay Mathur;Carolina Sanchez-Hernandez;Doreen S Boyd

  • Size and frequency of natural forest disturbances and the Amazon forest carbon balance

    Fernando D.B. Espírito-Santo;Fernando D.B. Espírito-Santo;Manuel Gloor;Michael Keller;Michael Keller;Michael Keller;Yadvinder Malhi

  • Estimating tropical forest biomass with a combination of SAR image texture and Landsat TM data: An assessment of predictions between regions

    M. E. J. Cutler;D. S. Boyd;G. M. Foody;Anand Vetrivel

  • Satellite remote sensing to monitor species diversity: potential and pitfalls

    Duccio Rocchini;Doreen S. Boyd;Jean‐Baptiste Féret;Giles M. Foody

  • An overview of recent remote sensing and GIS based research in ecological informatics

    Doreen S. Boyd;Giles M. Foody

  • Evaluation of approaches for forest cover estimation in the Pacific Northwest, USA, using remote sensing

    D.S Boyd;G.M Foody;W.J Ripple

  • One-Class Classification for Mapping a Specific Land-Cover Class: SVDD Classification of Fenland

    C. Sanchez-Hernandez;D.S. Boyd;G.M. Foody

  • Detecting the effects of hydrocarbon pollution in the Amazon forest using hyperspectral satellite images

    Paul Arellano;Paul Arellano;Kevin Tansey;Heiko Balzter;Doreen S. Boyd

  • Identifying species from the air: UAVs and the very high resolution challenge for plant conservation.

    Susana Baena;Justin Moat;Justin Moat;Oliver Whaley;Doreen S. Boyd

  • Assessing the Accuracy of Volunteered Geographic Information arising from Multiple Contributors to an Internet Based Collaborative Project

    Giles M. Foody;L. See;S Fritz;M. Van der Velde

  • The relationship between the biomass of Cameroonian tropical forests and radiation reflected in middle infrared wavelengths (3.0-5.0 mu m)

    D. S. Boyd;G. M. Foody;P. J. Curran

  • Supervised methods of image segmentation accuracy assessment in land cover mapping

    Hugo Costa;Giles M. Foody;Doreen S. Boyd

  • Opinion: To advance sustainable stewardship, we must document not only biodiversity but geodiversity

    Franziska Schrodt;Joseph J. Bailey;W. Daniel Kissling;Kenneth F. Rijsdijk

  • An assessment of radiance in Landsat TM middle and thermal infrared wavebands for the detection of tropical forest regeneration

    D.S. Boyd;G.M. Foody;P.J. Curran;R.M. Lucas

  • Mapping Complex Urban Land Cover from Spaceborne Imagery: The Influence of Spatial Resolution, Spectral Band Set and Classification Approach

    Rahman Momeni;Paul Aplin;Doreen S. Boyd

  • Mapping specific habitats from remotely sensed imagery: Support vector machine and support vector data description based classification of coastal saltmarsh habitats

    Carolina Sanchez-Hernandez;Doreen S. Boyd;Giles M. Foody

Frequent Co-Authors

Giles M. Foody
Giles M. Foody University of Nottingham
Paul J. Curran
Paul J. Curran City, University of London
Xiaodong Li
Xiaodong Li Hunan University
Justin Moat
Justin Moat Royal Botanic Gardens
Jadunandan Dash
Jadunandan Dash University of Southampton
Ross A. Hill
Ross A. Hill Bournemouth University
Yadvinder Malhi
Yadvinder Malhi University of Oxford
Mathias Disney
Mathias Disney University College London
Peter M. Atkinson
Peter M. Atkinson Lancaster University
Timothy R. Baker
Timothy R. Baker University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in environmental sciences, exploring related fields through online programs can open diverse career pathways. Many students complement their studies with specialized degrees in areas like geology and geographic information systems (GIS), which play crucial roles in understanding and managing natural resources.

One excellent option is pursuing one of the geology degrees online, which provide a solid foundation in earth sciences crucial for environmental assessment and conservation efforts. Similarly, earning a degree from the best GIS programs equips students with valuable skills to analyze spatial data, essential for environmental planning and disaster management.

For those interested in leadership and policy roles, a 1 year MPA online program offers a fast-track route to mastering public administration, which is increasingly relevant in environmental regulation and sustainable development.

Additionally, understanding human behavior and societal impacts is vital in environmental work. Online studies such as the online sociology bachelor programs help develop this perspective, enhancing community-focused conservation initiatives and policy design.

Best Scientists Citing Doreen S. Boyd

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles