World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 63 1014 932 34 32 177 20946

María J. Pozo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by María J. Pozo between 1989 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. María J. Pozo published across 38 years, from 1989 to 2026, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2010. 12 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2010. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 2 publications
1989 2026

220 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
María J. Pozo: publications per year, 1989 to 2026
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 3
1997 0
1998 3
1999 3
2000 3
2001 4
2002 6
2003 7
2004 6
2005 7
2006 11
2007 8
2008 6
2009 11
2010 16
2011 9
2012 9
2013 7
2014 8
2015 7
2016 6
2017 5
2018 9
2019 4
2020 9
2021 12
2022 4
2023 6
2024 13
2025 10
2026 2
Total 220
Download as CSV

María J. Pozo publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María J. Pozo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 176–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 177 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126 177
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

María J. Pozo D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where María J. Pozo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61 63
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Enzyme

María J. Pozo spends much of his time researching Botany, Symbiosis, Plant defense against herbivory, Mycorrhiza and Ecology. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Jasmonate and Phycomycetes. His Jasmonate research includes elements of Defence mechanisms and Cell biology.

His Symbiosis research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Strigolactone, Salinity and Abscisic acid. His work investigates the relationship between Plant defense against herbivory and topics such as Plant disease resistance that intersect with problems in Biotechnology, Plant species and Arabidopsis. His Ecology research focuses on Beneficial organism and how it connects with Jasmonic acid.

His most cited work include:

  • Priming: Getting Ready for Battle (1041 citations)
  • Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere (785 citations)
  • Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. (779 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Botany, Symbiosis, Mycorrhiza, Ecology and Cell biology are his primary areas of study. María J. Pozo interconnects Defence mechanisms, Jasmonic acid and Plant defense against herbivory in the investigation of issues within Botany. His work in the fields of Arbuscular mycorrhiza overlaps with other areas such as Rhizophagus irregularis.

His studies in Mycorrhiza integrate themes in fields like Plant nutrition and Phenotypic plasticity. His Ecology study combines topics in areas such as Biotic stress, Beneficial organism, Rhizosphere and Plant microbe. The study incorporates disciplines such as Gene expression, Jasmonate, Mutant, Arabidopsis and Hormone in addition to Cell biology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (54.65%)
  • Symbiosis (37.21%)
  • Mycorrhiza (22.09%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Symbiosis (37.21%)
  • Botany (54.65%)
  • Cell biology (19.77%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of study are Symbiosis, Botany, Cell biology, Mycorrhiza and Botrytis cinerea. His Arbuscular mycorrhiza study in the realm of Symbiosis connects with subjects such as Rhizophagus irregularis. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Plant defense against herbivory, Osmotic shock and Metabolic pathway.

His Cell biology research incorporates elements of Invertase, Endogeny and Arabidopsis. The concepts of his Botrytis cinerea study are interwoven with issues in Callose, Shoot and Defence mechanisms. His Shoot study also includes fields such as

  • Pathogen and related Regulation of gene expression, Biological pest control, Gene, Transcription factor and Macrophomina phaseolina,
  • Pectin, Microbiology and Differential regulation most often made with reference to Systemic immunity,
  • Gene expression and related Jasmonic acid.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Root metabolic plasticity underlies functional diversity in mycorrhiza‐enhanced stress tolerance in tomato (40 citations)
  • Growing Research Networks on Mycorrhizae for Mutual Benefits (21 citations)
  • Nitric oxide and phytoglobin PHYTOGB1 are regulatory elements in the Solanum lycopersicum–Rhizophagus irregularis mycorrhizal symbiosis (19 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Enzyme

María J. Pozo mainly investigates Symbiosis, Mycorrhiza, Botany, Function and Rhizophagus irregularis. His Symbiosis study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Pathogen, Chlorophyll, Downregulation and upregulation, Host and Cell biology. His study of Mycorrhiza brings together topics like Organizational level, Parallels, Road map, Context and Discipline.

While working in this field, María J. Pozo studies both Botany and Plasticity. María J. Pozo combines subjects such as Plant Immunity, Nitric oxide, Fusarium oxysporum and Hypersensitive response with his study of Function. Gibberellic acid, Shoot, Gibberellin, Oxylipin and Jasmonic acid are fields of study that intersect with his Rhizophagus irregularis research.

Best Publications

  • Priming: Getting Ready for Battle

    Uwe Conrath;Gerold J.M. Beckers;Victor Flors;Pilar García-Agustín

  • Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere

    José-Miguel Barea;María José Pozo;Rosario Azcón;Concepción Azcón-Aguilar

  • Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance.

    María J Pozo;Concepción Azcón-Aguilar

  • Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack.

    Martin De Vos;Vivian R. Van Oosten;Remco M. P. Van Poecke;Johan A. Van Pelt

  • Mycorrhiza-Induced Resistance and Priming of Plant Defenses

    Sabine C. Jung;Ainhoa Martinez-Medina;Juan A. Lopez-Raez;Maria J. Pozo

  • Recognizing Plant Defense Priming

    Ainhoa Martinez-Medina;Victor Flors;Martin Heil;Brigitte Mauch-Mani

  • Localized versus systemic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on defence responses to Phytophthora infection in tomato plants

    Maria J. Pozo;Christelle Cordier;Eliane Dumas‐Gaudot;Silvio Gianinazzi

  • Cell defense responses associated with localized and systemic resistance to Phytophthora parasitica induced in tomato by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus

    C. Cordier;M. J. Pozo;J. M. Barea;S. Gianinazzi

  • Sm1, a proteinaceous elicitor secreted by the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma virens induces plant defense responses and systemic resistance.

    Slavica Djonović;Maria J. Pozo;Lawrence J. Dangott;Charles R. Howell

  • Phytohormones as integrators of environmental signals in the regulation of mycorrhizal symbioses.

    María J. Pozo;Juan A. López‐Ráez;Concepción Azcón‐Aguilar;José M. García‐Garrido

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis influences strigolactone production under salinity and alleviates salt stress in lettuce plants.

    Ricardo Aroca;Juan Manuel Ruiz-Lozano;Ángel María Zamarreño;José Antonio Paz

  • Jasmonates - Signals in Plant-Microbe Interactions

    María J. Pozo;L. C. Van Loon;Corné M. J. Pieterse

  • Transcription factor MYC2 is involved in priming for enhanced defense during rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Maria J. Pozo;Sjoerd Van Der Ent;L. C. Van Loon;Corné M. J. Pieterse

  • Shifting from priming of salicylic acid- to jasmonic acid-regulated defences by Trichoderma protects tomato against the root knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita.

    Ainhoa Martínez-Medina;Ivan Fernandez;Gerrit B. Lok;María J. Pozo

  • Hormonal and transcriptional profiles highlight common and differential host responses to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and the regulation of the oxylipin pathway

    Juan A. López-Ráez;Adriaan Verhage;Iván Fernández;Juan M. García

  • The tomato CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE8 (SlCCD8) regulates rhizosphere signaling, plant architecture and affects reproductive development through strigolactone biosynthesis

    W. Kohlen;T. Charnikhova;M. Lammers;T. Pollina

  • Priming of plant innate immunity by rhizobacteria and β‐aminobutyric acid: differences and similarities in regulation

    Sjoerd Van der Ent;Marieke Van Hulten;Maria J. Pozo;Maria J. Pozo;Tomasz Czechowski;Tomasz Czechowski

  • Deciphering the hormonal signalling network behind the systemic resistance induced by Trichoderma harzianum in tomato

    Ainhoa Martínez-Medina;Iván Fernández;María J. Sánchez-Guzmán;Sabine C. Jung

  • Beneficial microbes in a changing environment: are they always helping plants to deal with insects?

    Ana Pineda;Marcel Dicke;Corné M.J. Pieterse;María J. Pozo

  • Do strigolactones contribute to plant defence

    Rocío Torres-Vera;Juan M. García;María J. Pozo;Juan A. López-Ráez

Frequent Co-Authors

Juan A. López-Ráez
Juan A. López-Ráez Spanish National Research Council
Victor Flors
Victor Flors Jaume I University
Corné M. J. Pieterse
Corné M. J. Pieterse Utrecht University
Concepción Azcón-Aguilar
Concepción Azcón-Aguilar Spanish National Research Council
Jurriaan Ton
Jurriaan Ton University of Sheffield
L.C. van Loon
L.C. van Loon Utrecht University
Eliane Dumas-Gaudot
Eliane Dumas-Gaudot Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Brigitte Mauch-Mani
Brigitte Mauch-Mani University of Fribourg
Charles M. Kenerley
Charles M. Kenerley Texas A&M University
Silvio Gianinazzi
Silvio Gianinazzi INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing María J. Pozo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles