World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 108 982 937 598 566 491 41194
Medicine 108 6012 5649 3215 2980 482 42116

Roberta B. Ness publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Roberta B. Ness between 1986 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Roberta B. Ness published across 39 years, from 1986 to 2024, averaging 14.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 67 publications in 2023. 68 of the 558 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 67. Peak 67 publications in 2023. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 33 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 23 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 67 publications 2024: 1 publication
1986 2024

558 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Roberta B. Ness: publications per year, 1986 to 2024
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 3
1990 2
1991 4
1992 3
1993 4
1994 3
1995 5
1996 4
1997 10
1998 6
1999 9
2000 18
2001 16
2002 10
2003 26
2004 21
2005 33
2006 26
2007 32
2008 23
2009 23
2010 23
2011 21
2012 19
2013 25
2014 12
2015 22
2016 29
2017 14
2018 18
2019 8
2020 15
2021 2
2022 0
2023 67
2024 1
Total 558
Download as CSV

Roberta B. Ness publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberta B. Ness sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 482 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 482
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Roberta B. Ness D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberta B. Ness sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Roberta B. Ness is affiliated with The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in the United States. Their research encompasses multiple interdisciplinary fields, with a primary focus on Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Subfields of particular emphasis include Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Oncology.

The scientist's recent published papers cover a range of topics related to ovarian and reproductive health. Notable works include:

  • Association Between Breastfeeding and Ovarian Cancer Risk (2020, JAMA Oncology)
  • Clinical and pathological associations of PTEN expression in ovarian cancer: a multicentre study from the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium (2020, British Journal of Cancer)
  • Population-based targeted sequencing of 54 candidate genes identifies PALB2 as a susceptibility gene for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (2020, Journal of Medical Genetics)
  • Expanding Our Understanding of Ovarian Cancer Risk: The Role of Incomplete Pregnancies (2020, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute)
  • Presence and Concentrations of Select Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Bacteria Are Associated With Increased Risk of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (2020, Sexually Transmitted Diseases)

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • JAMA Oncology
  • British Journal of Cancer
  • Journal of Medical Genetics

Research collaborations feature several frequent coauthors, such as:

  • Jennifer A. Doherty
  • Marc T. Goodman
  • Susanne K. Kjær
  • Celeste Leigh Pearce
  • Penelope M. Webb

Main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

The combination of research fields and topics indicates a significant engagement with cancer biology, particularly ovarian cancer, alongside an interest in reproductive health and molecular mechanisms influencing cancer risks and treatment outcomes. Their work extends to genetic susceptibility and pathological factors contributing to cancer development and progression.

Best Publications

  • Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies.

    Celeste Leigh Pearce;Claire Templeman;Mary Anne Rossing;Alice Lee

  • Common Genetic Variation In Cellular Transport Genes and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk

    Ganna Chornokur;Hui-Yi Lin;Jonathan P. Tyrer;Kate Lawrenson

  • Risk of Sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Infection in Women

    Catherine L. Haggerty;Sami L. Gottlieb;Brandie D. Taylor;Nicola Low

  • Possible Role of Ovarian Epithelial Inflammation in Ovarian Cancer

    Roberta B. Ness;Carrie Cottreau

  • Heterogeneous causes constituting the single syndrome of preeclampsia: A hypothesis and its implications

    Roberta B. Ness;James M. Roberts

  • Duration of Lactation and Risk Factors for Maternal Cardiovascular Disease

    E.B. Schwarz;R.M. Ray;A.M. Stuebe;M.A. Allison

  • Multiple independent variants at the TERT locus are associated with telomere length and risks of breast and ovarian cancer

    Stig E. Bojesen;Stig E. Bojesen;Karen A. Pooley;Sharon E. Johnatty;Jonathan Beesley

  • Shared and disparate components of the pathophysiologies of fetal growth restriction and preeclampsia

    Roberta B Ness;Bahaeddine M Sibai

  • Infertility, Fertility Drugs, and Ovarian Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies

    Roberta B. Ness;Daniel W. Cramer;Marc T. Goodman;Susanne Krûger Kjaer

  • Effectiveness of inpatient and outpatient treatment strategies for women with pelvic inflammatory disease: Results from the pelvic inflammatory disease evaluation and clinical health (peach) randomized trial

    Roberta B. Ness;David E. Soper;Robert L. Holley;Jeffrey Peipert

  • Bone lead levels in adjudicated delinquents: A case control study

    Herbert L. Needleman;Christine McFarland;Christine McFarland;Roberta B. Ness;Roberta B. Ness;Stephen E. Fienberg;Stephen E. Fienberg

  • A cluster analysis of bacterial vaginosis-associated microflora and pelvic inflammatory disease

    Roberta B. Ness;Kevin E. Kip;Sharon L. Hillier;David E. Soper

  • The Risk of Preeclampsia Rises with Increasing Prepregnancy Body Mass Index

    Lisa M. Bodnar;Roberta B. Ness;Nina Markovic;James M. Roberts

  • Factors related to inflammation of the ovarian epithelium and risk of ovarian cancer.

    Roberta B. Ness;Jeane Ann Grisso;Carrie Cottreau;Jennifer Klapper

  • Systematic review: noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

    Robert L. Cook;Shari L. Hutchison;Lars Østergaard;R. Scott Braithwaite

  • Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

    Catherine M Phelan;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Jonathan P Tyrer;Siddhartha P Kar

  • COCAINE AND TOBACCO USE AND THE RISK OF SPONTANEOUS ABORTION

    Roberta B. Ness;Jeane Ann Grisso;Nancy Hirschinger;Nina Markovic

  • GWAS meta-analysis and replication identifies three new susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer

    Paul D.P. Pharoah;Ya Yu Tsai;Susan J. Ramus;Catherine M. Phelan

  • Number of pregnancies and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease.

    Roberta B. Ness;Tamara Harris;Janet Cobb;Katherine M. Flegal

  • REVIEW Possible Role of Ovarian Epithelial Inflammation in Ovarian Cancer

    Roberta B. Ness;Carrie Cottreau

Frequent Co-Authors

Joellen M. Schildkraut
Joellen M. Schildkraut University of Virginia
Jennifer A. Doherty
Jennifer A. Doherty University of Utah
Daniel W. Cramer
Daniel W. Cramer Brigham and Women's Hospital
Marc T. Goodman
Marc T. Goodman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Susan J. Ramus
Susan J. Ramus University of New South Wales
Jenny Chang-Claude
Jenny Chang-Claude German Cancer Research Center
Anna H. Wu
Anna H. Wu University of Southern California
Andrew Berchuck
Andrew Berchuck Duke University
Susanne K. Kjaer
Susanne K. Kjaer University of Copenhagen
Ellen L. Goode
Ellen L. Goode Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but not sure if a traditional MD path is right for you, there are many other rewarding options to explore. Flexible online education has made it easier than ever to start a career in medicine, nursing, or healthcare administration—even for those with busy schedules or who need financial assistance.

For those new to patient care, consider online adn programs for non nurses, which offer a fast track to becoming a registered nurse. If you want to avoid lengthy entrance exams, look into absn programs that don't require teas for a more streamlined admissions process. Alternatively, those interested in the administrative side of healthcare can benefit from online health administration programs that prepare you for leadership roles in medical settings.

Not all roles require direct patient care—medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid can help you start a specialized medical office career with strong job prospects.

These alternative degrees and online pathways offer flexible, accessible entry points into the fast-growing healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Roberta B. Ness

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles