World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
31485
World Ranking
11726
National Ranking
368

Penelope M. Webb publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Penelope M. Webb sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 495 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Penelope M. Webb D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Penelope M. Webb sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Penelope M. Webb is affiliated with the QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Reproductive Medicine, Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Genetics, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

Their published work covers several main topics related to cancer and reproductive health, including:

  • Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
  • Cancer Risks and Factors
  • Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Estrogen and related hormone effects

Recent papers by Penelope M. Webb include:

  • Global epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer, 2024, published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Webb include:

  • Marc T. Goodman
  • Susan J. Jordan
  • Andrew Berchuck
  • Jennifer A. Doherty
  • Celeste Leigh Pearce

Common publication venues where Webb's research appears are:

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • International Journal of Epidemiology
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • UNC Libraries

In addition to journal articles, Webb has contributed to book publications, including "Essential Epidemiology" published in 2024 by Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • BRCA Mutation Frequency and Patterns of Treatment Response in BRCA Mutation–Positive Women With Ovarian Cancer: A Report From the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group

    Kathryn Alsop;Sian Fereday;Cliff Meldrum;Anna deFazio

  • Association between endometriosis and risk of histological subtypes of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of case-control studies.

    Celeste Leigh Pearce;Claire Templeman;Mary Anne Rossing;Alice Lee

  • Epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Penelope M. Webb;Penelope M. Webb;Susan J. Jordan;Susan J. Jordan

  • Type I and II Endometrial Cancers: Have They Different Risk Factors?

    Veronica Wendy Setiawan;Hannah P. Yang;Malcolm C. Pike;Malcolm C. Pike;Susan E. McCann;Susan E. McCann

  • EPIDEMIOLOGY OF, AND RISK-FACTORS FOR, HELICOBACTER-PYLORI INFECTION AMONG 3194 ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS IN 17 POPULATIONS.

    D Forman;Gui De Backer;J Elder;H Moller

  • Relation between infection with Helicobacter pylori and living conditions in childhood: evidence for person to person transmission in early life

    P M Webb;T Knight;S Greaves;A Wilson

  • Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer

    Catherine M Phelan;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Karoline B Kuchenbaecker;Jonathan P Tyrer;Siddhartha P Kar

  • A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for ovarian cancer at 2q31 and 8q24

    Ellen L Goode;Georgia Chenevix-Trench;Honglin Song;Susan J Ramus

  • Obesity and the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Catherine M. Olsen;Adèle C. Green;David C. Whiteman;Shahram Sadeghi;Shahram Sadeghi

  • Cigarette Smoking and Adenocarcinomas of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction: A Pooled Analysis From the International BEACON Consortium

    Michael B. Cook;Farin Kamangar;Farin Kamangar;David C. Whiteman;Neal D. Freedman

  • Combined effects of obesity, acid reflux and smoking on the risk of adenocarcinomas of the oesophagus.

    David C. Whiteman;Shahram Sadeghi;Nirmala Pandeya;Bernard Mark Smithers

  • A genome-wide association study identifies a new ovarian cancer susceptibility locus on 9p22.2.

    Honglin Song;Susan J. Ramus;Jonathan Tyrer;Kelly L. Bolton;Kelly L. Bolton

  • Ovarian cancer and smoking: individual participant meta-analysis including 28 114 women with ovarian cancer from 51 epidemiological studies

    E. E. Calle;S. M. Gapstur;A. V. Patel;L. Dal Maso

  • Common variants at 19p13 are associated with susceptibility to ovarian cancer.

    Kelly L Bolton;Kelly L Bolton;Jonathan Tyrer;Honglin Song;Susan J Ramus

  • Ovulation and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

    David M Purdie;Christopher J Bain;Victor Siskind;Penelope M Webb

  • Aspirin, Nonaspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug, and Acetaminophen Use and Risk of Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A Pooled Analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

    Britton Trabert;Roberta B. Ness;Wei Hsuan Lo-Ciganic;Megan A. Murphy

  • Tumor Mismatch Repair Immunohistochemistry and DNA MLH1 Methylation Testing of Patients With Endometrial Cancer Diagnosed at Age Younger Than 60 Years Optimizes Triage for Population-Level Germline Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Testing

    Daniel D. Buchanan;Yen Y. Tan;Michael D. Walsh;Mark Clendenning

  • Obesity and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: evidence from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

    Catherine M Olsen;Christina M Nagle;David C Whiteman;Roberta Ness

  • Recreational and occupational field exposure to freshwater cyanobacteria - a review of anecdotal and case reports, epidemiological studies and the challenges for epidemiologic assessment

    Ian Stewart;Ian Stewart;Penelope M Webb;Philip J Schluter;Glendon Reginald Shaw;Glendon Reginald Shaw;Glendon Reginald Shaw

  • Talcum powder, chronic pelvic inflammation and NSAIDs in relation to risk of epithelial ovarian cancer.

    Melissa A. Merritt;Melissa A. Merritt;Adèle C. Green;Christina M. Nagle;Penelope M. Webb

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Whiteman
David C. Whiteman QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Adèle C. Green
Adèle C. Green QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Jennifer A. Doherty
Jennifer A. Doherty University of Utah
Marc T. Goodman
Marc T. Goodman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Anna H. Wu
Anna H. Wu University of Southern California
Joellen M. Schildkraut
Joellen M. Schildkraut University of Virginia
Daniel W. Cramer
Daniel W. Cramer Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jenny Chang-Claude
Jenny Chang-Claude German Cancer Research Center
Harvey A. Risch
Harvey A. Risch Yale University
Andrew Berchuck
Andrew Berchuck Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a career in medicine doesn’t have to follow a traditional path. There are numerous best online mha programs that prepare you for leadership roles in healthcare: perfect for those interested in administration over clinical practice.

If affordability is a top concern, consider exploring the cheapest mha online programs. These options offer flexibility for working students, enabling you to upskill without the financial burden of expensive tuition fees.

For advanced practice nurses, pursuing higher education can lead to leadership and specialized roles. Several cheap online dnp programs offer a cost-effective route to a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree while balancing work and personal commitments.

Those interested in pharmaceutical sciences can also benefit from a remote learning experience. An online pharmacist degree provides a practical, accessible pathway to enter this high-demand field.

Each of these pathways opens new doors across the healthcare sector, allowing students to build rewarding and impactful careers with both clinical and non-clinical opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Penelope M. Webb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles