World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
24661
World Ranking
13297
National Ranking
436

Hak-Kim Chan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hak-Kim Chan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 448 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Hak-Kim Chan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hak-Kim Chan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hak-Kim Chan is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Engineering, with a focus on subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Ecology, Computational Mechanics, Biomedical Engineering, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's primary research topics include:

  • Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • Aerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
  • Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Microbial infections and disease research

Hak-Kim Chan has published numerous papers, often appearing in venues such as the International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, Powder Technology, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Recent papers include:

  • Novel antimicrobial agents for combating antibiotic-resistant bacteria, 2022, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
  • Topical application of bacteriophages for treatment of wound infections, 2020, Translational Research
  • Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of phage therapy: a major hurdle to clinical translation, 2023, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
  • Dry powder pharmaceutical biologics for inhalation therapy, 2021, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
  • Phage-Antibiotic Therapy as a Promising Strategy to Combat Multidrug-Resistant Infections and to Enhance Antimicrobial Efficiency, 2022, Antibiotics

Frequently collaborating coauthors include:

  • Rachel Yoon Kyung Chang
  • Agisilaos Kourmatzis
  • Shaokoon Cheng
  • Philip Chi Lip Kwok
  • Dipesh Khanal

Best Publications

  • Recommendations for the standardisation of oxytocin nasal administration and guidelines for its reporting in human research.

    Adam J. Guastella;Ian B. Hickie;Margaret M. McGuinness;Margaret M. McGuinness;Melissa Otis;Melissa Otis

  • Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids.

    Jörg D. Leuppi;Cheryl M. Salome;Christine R. Jenkins;Sandra D. Anderson

  • Nanodrugs: pharmacokinetics and safety

    Satomi Onoue;Shizuo Yamada;Hak-Kim Chan

  • A New Method For Bronchial-provocation Testing in Asthmatic Subjects Using a Dry Powder of Mannitol

    Sandra D. Anderson;John Brannan;Joanne Spring;Natasha Spalding

  • How much particle surface corrugation is sufficient to improve aerosol performance of powders

    Nora Y. K. Chew;Patricia Tang;Hak-Kim Chan;Judy A. Raper;Judy A. Raper

  • Formation, characterization, and fate of inhaled drug nanoparticles

    Jian Zhang;Libo Wu;Hak-Kim Chan;Wiwik Watanabe

  • Pulmonary delivery of therapeutic siRNA.

    Jenny Ka-Wing Lam;Wanling Liang;Hak-Kim Chan

  • Inhaled formulations and pulmonary drug delivery systems for respiratory infections

    Qi Tony Zhou;Sharon Shui Yee Leung;Patricia Tang;Thaigarajan Parumasivam

  • Mucociliary clearance in patients with cystic fibrosis and in normal subjects.

    J. A. Regnis;M. Robinson;D. L. Bailey;P. Cook

  • The effect of inhaled mannitol on bronchial mucus clearance in cystic fibrosis patients: a pilot study.

    M. Robinson;E. Daviskas;S. Eberl;J. Baker

  • Emerging inhalation aerosol devices and strategies: where are we headed?

    Qi Tony Zhou;Patricia Tang;Sharon Shui Yee Leung;John Gar Yan Chan

  • Pulmonary drug delivery by powder aerosols

    Michael Yifei Yang;John Gar Yan Chan;Hak-Kim Chan

  • Spray Dried Powders and Powder Blends of Recombinant Human Deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase) for Aerosol Delivery

    Hak-Kim Chan;Andy Clark;Igor Gonda;Marco Mumenthaler

  • Mannitol as a challenge test to identify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes

    Karen Holzer;Sandra D Anderson;Hak-Kim Chan;Jo A Douglass

  • Liposomal formulations for inhalation

    David Cipolla;Igor Gonda;Hak-Kim Chan

  • Amorphous powders for inhalation drug delivery.

    Lan Chen;Tomoyuki Okuda;Xiang-Yun Lu;Hak-Kim Chan

  • In vitro/in vivo comparisons in pulmonary drug delivery.

    Stephen P. Newman;Hak-Kim Chan

  • Phage therapy for respiratory infections.

    Rachel Yoon Kyung Chang;Martin Wallin;Yu Lin;Sharon Sui Yee Leung

  • Inhalation of Dry Powder Mannitol Improves Clearance of Mucus in Patients with Bronchiectasis

    Evangelia Daviskas;Sandra D. Anderson;Stefan Eberl;H-Kim Chan

  • Isoniazid Proliposome Powders for Inhalation—Preparation, Characterization and Cell Culture Studies

    Wipaporn Rojanarat;Narumon Changsan;Ekawat Tawithong;Sirirat Pinsuwan

Frequent Co-Authors

Warwick J. Britton
Warwick J. Britton University of Sydney
Abolghasem Jouyban
Abolghasem Jouyban Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
Elizabeth Kutter
Elizabeth Kutter The Evergreen State College
Sandra D. Anderson
Sandra D. Anderson Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Aibing Yu
Aibing Yu Monash University
Reginald B. H. Tan
Reginald B. H. Tan National University of Singapore
Wojciech Chrzanowski
Wojciech Chrzanowski University of Sydney
David F. Fletcher
David F. Fletcher University of Sydney
Fariba Dehghani
Fariba Dehghani University of Sydney
Robert K. Prud'homme
Robert K. Prud'homme Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA offers a variety of pathways for students with different backgrounds and interests. Many allied health and health administration roles now have flexible online degree options, allowing for career advancement without the need to pause your current job or relocate.

For nurses aiming to take on advanced practice roles, there are asn to nurse practitioner programs, which provide a streamlined bridge for those with an associate degree. If you’re interested in dietetics, wellness, or holistic health, an online bs in nutrition can open up new career paths in a rapidly growing field.

For those interested in healthcare management, top online mha programs that are cahme accredited ensure academic quality and professional recognition. Additionally, registered nurses who want to earn a bachelor's degree quickly may consider online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, making it easier to balance work and studies.

These diverse online programs provide accessible, reputable options for building or advancing your healthcare career even if traditional medical school isn’t your path.

Best Scientists Citing Hak-Kim Chan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles