World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
27414
World Ranking
11845
National Ranking
374

Sandra D. Anderson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra D. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 292 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sandra D. Anderson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra D. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra D. Anderson is affiliated with Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Australia and has contributed to the field of Medicine, focusing primarily on pulmonary and respiratory medicine as well as physiology. Their research interests emphasize inhalation and respiratory drug delivery, asthma and respiratory diseases, and respiratory and cough-related research.

The scientist has published in several peer-reviewed venues, including:

  • Pharmacological Reviews
  • Frontiers in Allergy
  • Cutis
  • GeroScience

Key publications by Sandra D. Anderson include:

  • "Inhaled Medicines: Past, Present, and Future," 2022, Pharmacological Reviews
  • "A proposal to account for the stimulus, the mechanism, and the mediators released in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction," 2023, Frontiers in Allergy
  • "Operational Risk Management in Dermatologic Procedures," 2025, Cutis

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Paul J. Atkins
  • Per Bäckman
  • David Cipolla
  • Andrew R. Clark
  • Evangelia Daviskas

Their work on the mechanisms and management of respiratory conditions aligns with their primary subfields of pulmonary and respiratory medicine and physiology. The publications span a range of topics relevant to inhalation therapies and exercise-induced respiratory responses, as well as extending into clinical operational risk management in dermatologic procedures.

The scientist's research contributions have been cited, indicating engagement with the scientific community in these specialized areas, especially in respiratory drug delivery and bronchoconstriction mechanisms.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999.

    Crapo Ro;Casaburi R;Coates Al;Enright Pl

  • Airway Responsiveness. Standardized Challenge Testing With Pharmacological, Physical and Sensitizing Stimuli in Adults. Report Working Party Standardization of Lung Function Tests, European Community for Steel and Coal. Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society

    P. J. Sterk;Leonardo Fabbri;P. H. Quanjer;D. W. Cockcroft

  • Airway responsiveness : standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults

    P. J. Sterk;L. M. Fabbri;P. H. Quanjer;D. W. Cockcroft

  • An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

    Jonathan P. Parsons;Teal S. Hallstrand;John G. Mastronarde;David A. Kaminsky

  • The mechanism of exercise-induced asthma is ...

    Sandra D. Anderson;Evangelia Daviskas

  • Indirect airway challenges

    GF Joos;B O'Connor;SD Anderson;F Chung

  • Standardization of Exercise Tests in Asthmatic Children

    M. Silverman;Sandra D. Anderson

  • Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids.

    Jörg D. Leuppi;Cheryl M. Salome;Christine R. Jenkins;Sandra D. Anderson

  • Bronchial hyperreactivity in response to inhalation of ultrasonically nebulised solutions of distilled water and saline.

    R E Schoeffel;S D Anderson;R E Altounyan

  • Exercise-induced asthma

    Sandra D. Anderson;Michael Silverman;Peter König;Simon Godfrey

  • A New Method For Bronchial-provocation Testing in Asthmatic Subjects Using a Dry Powder of Mannitol

    Sandra D. Anderson;John Brannan;Joanne Spring;Natasha Spalding

  • Prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma in a rural adult population.

    A J Woolcock;J K Peat;C M Salome;K Yan

  • Is there a unifying hypothesis for exercise-induced asthma?

    Sandra D. Anderson

  • Provocation by eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea to identify exercise induced bronchoconstriction

    S D Anderson;G J Argyros;H Magnussen;K Holzer

  • Sensitivity to heat and water loss at rest and during exercise in asthmatic patients.

    S D Anderson;R E Schoeffel;R Follet;C P Perry

  • Clinical exercise testing with reference to lung diseases : indications, standardization and interpretation strategies

    J. Roca;B.J. Whipp;A.G.N. Agusti;S.D. Anderson

  • Airway injury as a mechanism for exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes

    Sandra D. Anderson;Pascale Kippelen

  • The safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol as a bronchial provocation test for airway hyperresponsiveness: a phase 3 comparison study with hypertonic (4.5%) saline

    John D Brannan;Sandra D Anderson;Clare P Perry;Ruth Freed-Martens

  • Asthma and the elite athlete: Summary of the International Olympic Committee's Consensus Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, January 22-24, 2008

    Kenneth D. Fitch;Malcolm Sue-Chu;Sandra D. Anderson;Louis-Philippe Boulet

  • Exercise in elite summer athletes: Challenges for diagnosis.

    Karen Holzer;Sandra D Anderson;Jo A Douglass

Frequent Co-Authors

Hak-Kim Chan
Hak-Kim Chan University of Sydney
Barbro Dahlén
Barbro Dahlén Karolinska Institute
Sven-Erik Dahlén
Sven-Erik Dahlén Karolinska Institute
Ann J. Woolcock
Ann J. Woolcock Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Leif Bjermer
Leif Bjermer Lund University
Donald W. Cockcroft
Donald W. Cockcroft University of Saskatchewan
Vibeke Backer
Vibeke Backer Rigshospitalet
Brian J. Lipworth
Brian J. Lipworth University of Dundee
Sergio Bonini
Sergio Bonini National Research Council (CNR)
Leonardo M. Fabbri
Leonardo M. Fabbri University of Ferrara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a future in medicine but looking for flexible or alternative education routes, there are many online healthcare degrees to consider. These programs offer pathways into high-demand medical and administrative roles, often with more convenience and affordability than traditional routes.

For nursing professionals, accelerated programs like the fastest psychiatric nurse practitioner program can help you quickly qualify for specialized, high-impact roles in mental health care. On the administrative side, those aiming to hold managerial or executive positions in healthcare systems can benefit from the cheapest online healthcare administration degree and cheapest mha programs online options, which prepare graduates for leadership with less financial strain.

Nurses who wish to take their practice to the highest level may also consider the most affordable dnp programs to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree online. These online paths can fit busy lifestyles and help you advance your medical career efficiently and affordably.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra D. Anderson

Trending Scientists