World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
23193
World Ranking
16194
National Ranking
542

Ann J. Woolcock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann J. Woolcock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 242 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ann J. Woolcock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann J. Woolcock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann J. Woolcock was affiliated with Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in Australia. Their research predominantly focused on the field of Medicine, contributing to various subfields including Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Emergency Medical Services, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and the Endocrine and Autonomic Systems.

The scientist collaborated with several frequent co-authors during their career, including Julie-Anne Martyn, Angela Ratsch, Elizabeth Burmeister, Aunty Veronica Bird, and Aunty Joyce Bonner.

Ann J. Woolcock published work in notable venues such as The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Their research addressed multiple interdisciplinary topics, reflecting a focus on both medical and social determinants of health. Main topics of their work included:

  • Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Their recent papers demonstrated a blend of public health and indigenous health concerns. Among these were:

  • "An appreciative inquiry to identify the continuing education needs of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health practitioners in regional Queensland," published in 2020 in The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education
  • "Tobacco, nicotine, and cannabis use and exposure in an Australian Indigenous population during pregnancy: A protocol to measure parental and foetal exposure and outcomes," published in 2024 in bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Ann J. Woolcock's work reflected engagement with indigenous health education and prenatal substance exposure research, integrating clinical, educational, and community health perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Changing prevalence of asthma in Australian children

    J. K. Peat;R. H. van den Berg;W. F. Green;C. M. Mellis

  • House dust mite allergens. A major risk factor for childhood asthma in Australia.

    J K Peat;E Tovey;B G Toelle;M M Haby

  • Obesity is a risk for asthma and wheeze but not airway hyperresponsiveness

    L M Schachter;C M Salome;J K Peat;A J Woolcock

  • A scale for the measurement of quality of life in adults with asthma

    Guy B. Marks;Stewart M. Dunn;Ann J. Woolcock

  • Consumption of oily fish and childhood asthma risk

    Linda Hodge;Cheryl M Salome;Jennifer K Peat;Michelle M Haby

  • The shape of the dose-response curve to histamine in asthmatic and normal subjects.

    Ann J. Woolcock;C. M. Salome;K. Yan

  • Toward a definition of asthma for epidemiology.

    Brett G. Toelle;Jennifer K. Peat;Cheryl M. Salome;Craig M. Mellis

  • Longitudinal changes in atopy during a 4-year period: Relation to bronchial hyperresponsiveness and respiratory symptoms in a population sample of Australian schoolchildren

    J.K. Peat;C.M. Salome;A.J. Woolcock

  • Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids.

    Jörg D. Leuppi;Cheryl M. Salome;Christine R. Jenkins;Sandra D. Anderson

  • Evidence for the Increase in Asthma Worldwide

    Ann J. Woolcock;Jennifer K. Peat

  • Asthma management plan, 1989

    Ann Woolcock;J. Paul Seale;Abraham R. Rubinfeld;Louis L. Landau

  • Differences between asthma exacerbations and poor asthma control

    Helen Reddel;Sandra Ware;Guy Marks;Cheryl Salome

  • Prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma in a rural adult population.

    A J Woolcock;J K Peat;C M Salome;K Yan

  • Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in two populations of Australian schoolchildren. I. Relation to respiratory symptoms and diagnosed asthma

    C. M. Salome;J. K. Peat;W. J. Britton;A. J. Woolcock

  • Importance of house dust mite and Alternaria allergens in childhood asthma: an epidemiological study in two climatic regions of Australia.

    J. K. Peat;E. Tovey;C. M. Mellis;S. R. Leeder

  • Substance P immunoreactive nerves in airways from asthmatics and nonasthmatics

    SL Ollerenshaw;D Jarvis;CE Sullivan;AJ Woolcock

  • Characteristics of the Inflammation in Biopsies from Large Airways of Subjects with Asthma and Subjects with Chronic Airflow Limitation

    Suzanne L. Ollerenshaw;Ann J. Woolcock

  • Absence of immunoreactive vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in tissue from the lungs of patients with asthma.

    Suzanne Ollerenshaw;Deborah Jarvis;Ann Woolcock;Colin Sullivan

  • Factors associated with bronchial hyperresponsiveness in Australian adults and children.

    JK Peat;CM Salome;AJ Woolcock

  • Nocturnal asthma: role of snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.

    C. Shu Chan;Ann J. Woolcock;Colin E. Sullivan

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy B. Marks
Guy B. Marks University of New South Wales
Stephen R. Leeder
Stephen R. Leeder University of Sydney
Helen K. Reddel
Helen K. Reddel Woolcock Institute of Medical Research
Euan R. Tovey
Euan R. Tovey Woolcock Institute of Medical Research
Sandra D. Anderson
Sandra D. Anderson Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Michael P. Alpers
Michael P. Alpers Curtin University
Colin E. Sullivan
Colin E. Sullivan University of Sydney
Warwick J. Britton
Warwick J. Britton University of Sydney
Adrian Bauman
Adrian Bauman University of Sydney
Antony Basten
Antony Basten Garvan Institute of Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a medical career but want flexible study options, online degrees in healthcare fields are becoming increasingly popular. From medical billing to advanced nursing, online programs can make it easier—and more affordable—to launch or advance your healthcare career.

For those starting out, a great entry point is exploring how much does it cost to become a medical coder. Medical billing and coding courses are widely available online and provide essential skills for administrative roles in healthcare, often at a lower cost than traditional programs.

Nursing remains one of the most in-demand fields. Prospective nurses can investigate what is the cheapest online college for nursing? to find affordable pathways to becoming a registered nurse. If you’re ready to advance further, look into cheap np programs to become a nurse practitioner, enabling greater autonomy and earning potential.

Ambitious nurses can also pursue leadership or academic positions by enrolling in online phd programs in nursing. These advanced degrees provide opportunities for research, teaching, and high-level clinical roles—all from the convenience of online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Ann J. Woolcock

Recently Published Articles