World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emilie Phillips Smith

Emilie Phillips Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10751 10065 5621 5132 63 7431

Emilie Phillips Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Emilie Phillips Smith between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Emilie Phillips Smith published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2009. 6 of the 74 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2009. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 7 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1987 2025

74 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Emilie Phillips Smith: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 3
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 4
2002 1
2003 1
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 1
2008 1
2009 7
2010 1
2011 1
2012 2
2013 2
2014 1
2015 1
2016 3
2017 5
2018 2
2019 5
2020 4
2021 5
2022 2
2023 2
2024 3
2025 3
Total 74
Download as CSV

Emilie Phillips Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilie Phillips Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 63
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Emilie Phillips Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilie Phillips Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Emilie Phillips Smith is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research spans several fields within the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on aspects related to youth development, mental health, and culturally informed practices.

Their recent publications include works on culturally relevant parenting and resilience, examining approaches among African American and Latinx children and families. Notable papers by Emilie Phillips Smith and colleagues include:

  • "Culturally Relevant Parenting Approaches Among African American and Latinx Children and Families: Toward Resilient, Strengths-Based, Trauma-Informed Practices" (2022) in Adversity and Resilience Science
  • "Positive Youth Development in 2020: Theory, Research, Programs, and the Promotion of Social Justice" (2021) in Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • "Child Maltreatment and Resilience: The Promotive and Protective Role of Future Orientation" (2020) in Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Racism and preparation for bias within African American families" (2020) in Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
  • "Severe poverty and growth in behavioral self-regulation: The mediating role of parenting" (2020) in Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Emilie Phillips Smith frequently collaborates with a number of researchers, including Assaf Oshri, Margaret O'Brien Caughy, Zehua Cui, Sihong Liu, and Steven M. Kogan. These collaborations contribute to a varied exploration of themes in youth development and related sociocultural topics.

Their work is often published in journals such as:

  • Prevention Science
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology

Emilie Phillips Smith's main fields of study encompass Social Sciences and Psychology, supported by extensive work in subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Education, Safety Research, and General Health Professions.

Their research addresses key topics such as:

  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Best Publications

  • Parents' ethnic-racial socialization practices: a review of research and directions for future study.

    Diane Hughes;James Rodriguez;Emilie P. Smith;Deborah J. Johnson

  • Home chaos: sociodemographic, parenting, interactional, and child correlates

    Jean E. Dumas;Jenelle Nissley;Alicia Nordstrom;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • Ethnic Identity and Its Relationship to Self-Esteem, Perceived Efficacy and Prosocial Attitudes in Early Adolescence.

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Katrina Walker;Laurie Fields;Craig C. Brookins

  • Promoting intervention fidelity: Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial

    Jean E Dumas;Anne M Lynch;James E Laughlin;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • Family, School, and Community Factors and Relationships to Racial–Ethnic Attitudes and Academic Achievement

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Jacqueline Atkins;Christian M. Connell

  • Recruitment and retention of participants in prevention trials involving family-based interventions

    Ronald J Prinz;Emilie P Smith;Jean E Dumas;James E Laughlin

  • An Ecological Model of Home, School, and Community Partnerships: Implications for Research and Practice

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Christian M. Connell;Gary Wright;Monteic Sizer

  • Mentoring and the development of African-American graduate students.

    Emilie Phillips Smith;William S. Davidson

  • The EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial: an integrated set of interventions to promote competence and reduce risk for conduct disorder, substance abuse, and school failure.

    Jean E. Dumas;Ronald J. Prinz;Emilie Phillips Smith;James Laughlin

  • Positive Youth Development in 2020: Theory, Research, Programs, and the Promotion of Social Justice.

    Richard M Lerner;Jacqueline V Lerner;Velma McBride Murry;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • Cultural processes in parenting and youth outcomes: examining a model of racial-ethnic socialization and identity in diverse populations.

    James Rodriguez;Adriana Umaña-Taylor;Emilie Phillips Smith;Deborah J. Johnson

  • Toward the Development of an Ethnic Identity Measure for African American Youth

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Craig C. Brookins

  • A developmental perspective of the relationship of racial-ethnic identity to self-construct, achievement, and behavior in African American children.

    Chaundrissa Oyeshiku Smith;Douglas W. Levine;Emilie Phillips Smith;Jean Dumas

  • Latent Models of Family Processes in African American Families: Relationships to Child Competence, Achievement, and Problem Behavior

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Ronald J. Prinz;Jean E. Dumas;James Laughlin

  • Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Studies of Families in Context

    Velma McBride Murry;Emilie Phillips Smith;Nancy E. Hill

  • Community-Based multiple family groups to prevent and reduce violent and aggressive behavior: the GREAT Families Program.

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Deborah Gorman-Smith;William H Quinn;David L Rabiner

  • Measuring collective efficacy among children in community-based afterschool programs: exploring pathways toward prevention and positive youth development.

    Emilie Phillips Smith;D. Wayne Osgood;Linda Caldwell;Kathryn Hynes

  • Exploring the Meso-System The Roles of Community, Family, and Peers in Adolescent Delinquency and Positive Youth Development

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Monique Faulk;Monteic A. Sizer

  • The ecological effects of universal and selective violence prevention programs for middle school students: A randomized trial.

    Thomas R. Simon;Robin M. Ikeda;Emilie Phillips Smith;Le'Roy E. Reese

  • The multisite violence prevention project: impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on social-cognitive outcomes.

    Thomas R. Simon;Robin M. Ikeda;Emilie Phillips Smith;Le'Roy E. Reese

  • Preventing Youth Violence in a Multicultural Society.

    Nancy G. Guerra;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • SPECIAL SECTION Cultural Processes in Parenting and Youth Outcomes: Examining a Model of Racial-Ethnic Socialization and Identity in Diverse Populations

    James Rodriguez;Emilie Phillips Smith;Deborah J. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald J. Prinz
Ronald J. Prinz University of South Carolina
Margaret O Brien Caughy
Margaret O Brien Caughy University of Georgia
D. Wayne Osgood
D. Wayne Osgood Pennsylvania State University
David L. Rabiner
David L. Rabiner Duke University
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University
Patrick H. Tolan
Patrick H. Tolan University of Virginia
Deborah Gorman-Smith
Deborah Gorman-Smith University of Chicago
William S. Davidson
William S. Davidson Michigan State University
Linda L. Caldwell
Linda L. Caldwell Pennsylvania State University
Steven R. Asher
Steven R. Asher Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology program is essential for both academic success and long-term career goals. Many students consider affordability, location, and program reputation when exploring online degree options. For those seeking budget-friendly alternatives, reviewing the cheapest psychology degrees in Vermont can help lower student debt while gaining a quality education.

Popularity and demand for specific psychology programs also play a crucial role in decision-making. In North Carolina, a number of popular psychology degrees in Charlotte offer diverse specializations and flexible learning formats. Meanwhile, those looking for top-tier programs might explore the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Washington, D.C. for prestigious academic opportunities and strong professional networks.

If proximity to the Northeast is a priority, you may want to look at the most popular psychology degree programs in Delaware, which blend accessibility with robust curricula.

By comparing factors like program cost, popularity, and recognition, students can make informed decisions about which online psychology degree will best suit their interests and set the stage for rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Emilie Phillips Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles