World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Emilie Phillips Smith

Emilie Phillips Smith

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
7431
World Ranking
10751
National Ranking
5621

Emilie Phillips Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilie Phillips Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Emilie Phillips Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Emilie Phillips Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Emilie Phillips Smith is affiliated with the University of Georgia in the United States. Their research spans several fields within the social sciences and psychology, with a focus on aspects related to youth development, mental health, and culturally informed practices.

Their recent publications include works on culturally relevant parenting and resilience, examining approaches among African American and Latinx children and families. Notable papers by Emilie Phillips Smith and colleagues include:

  • "Culturally Relevant Parenting Approaches Among African American and Latinx Children and Families: Toward Resilient, Strengths-Based, Trauma-Informed Practices" (2022) in Adversity and Resilience Science
  • "Positive Youth Development in 2020: Theory, Research, Programs, and the Promotion of Social Justice" (2021) in Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • "Child Maltreatment and Resilience: The Promotive and Protective Role of Future Orientation" (2020) in Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • "Racism and preparation for bias within African American families" (2020) in Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
  • "Severe poverty and growth in behavioral self-regulation: The mediating role of parenting" (2020) in Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Emilie Phillips Smith frequently collaborates with a number of researchers, including Assaf Oshri, Margaret O'Brien Caughy, Zehua Cui, Sihong Liu, and Steven M. Kogan. These collaborations contribute to a varied exploration of themes in youth development and related sociocultural topics.

Their work is often published in journals such as:

  • Prevention Science
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology

Emilie Phillips Smith's main fields of study encompass Social Sciences and Psychology, supported by extensive work in subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Education, Safety Research, and General Health Professions.

Their research addresses key topics such as:

  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Best Publications

  • Parents' ethnic-racial socialization practices: a review of research and directions for future study.

    Diane Hughes;James Rodriguez;Emilie P. Smith;Deborah J. Johnson

  • Home chaos: sociodemographic, parenting, interactional, and child correlates

    Jean E. Dumas;Jenelle Nissley;Alicia Nordstrom;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • Ethnic Identity and Its Relationship to Self-Esteem, Perceived Efficacy and Prosocial Attitudes in Early Adolescence.

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Katrina Walker;Laurie Fields;Craig C. Brookins

  • Promoting intervention fidelity: Conceptual issues, methods, and preliminary results from the EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial

    Jean E Dumas;Anne M Lynch;James E Laughlin;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • Family, School, and Community Factors and Relationships to Racial–Ethnic Attitudes and Academic Achievement

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Jacqueline Atkins;Christian M. Connell

  • Recruitment and retention of participants in prevention trials involving family-based interventions

    Ronald J Prinz;Emilie P Smith;Jean E Dumas;James E Laughlin

  • An Ecological Model of Home, School, and Community Partnerships: Implications for Research and Practice

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Christian M. Connell;Gary Wright;Monteic Sizer

  • Mentoring and the development of African-American graduate students.

    Emilie Phillips Smith;William S. Davidson

  • The EARLY ALLIANCE prevention trial: an integrated set of interventions to promote competence and reduce risk for conduct disorder, substance abuse, and school failure.

    Jean E. Dumas;Ronald J. Prinz;Emilie Phillips Smith;James Laughlin

  • Positive Youth Development in 2020: Theory, Research, Programs, and the Promotion of Social Justice.

    Richard M Lerner;Jacqueline V Lerner;Velma McBride Murry;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • Cultural processes in parenting and youth outcomes: examining a model of racial-ethnic socialization and identity in diverse populations.

    James Rodriguez;Adriana Umaña-Taylor;Emilie Phillips Smith;Deborah J. Johnson

  • Toward the Development of an Ethnic Identity Measure for African American Youth

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Craig C. Brookins

  • A developmental perspective of the relationship of racial-ethnic identity to self-construct, achievement, and behavior in African American children.

    Chaundrissa Oyeshiku Smith;Douglas W. Levine;Emilie Phillips Smith;Jean Dumas

  • Latent Models of Family Processes in African American Families: Relationships to Child Competence, Achievement, and Problem Behavior

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Ronald J. Prinz;Jean E. Dumas;James Laughlin

  • Race, Ethnicity, and Culture in Studies of Families in Context

    Velma McBride Murry;Emilie Phillips Smith;Nancy E. Hill

  • Community-Based multiple family groups to prevent and reduce violent and aggressive behavior: the GREAT Families Program.

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Deborah Gorman-Smith;William H Quinn;David L Rabiner

  • Measuring collective efficacy among children in community-based afterschool programs: exploring pathways toward prevention and positive youth development.

    Emilie Phillips Smith;D. Wayne Osgood;Linda Caldwell;Kathryn Hynes

  • Exploring the Meso-System The Roles of Community, Family, and Peers in Adolescent Delinquency and Positive Youth Development

    Emilie Phillips Smith;Monique Faulk;Monteic A. Sizer

  • The ecological effects of universal and selective violence prevention programs for middle school students: A randomized trial.

    Thomas R. Simon;Robin M. Ikeda;Emilie Phillips Smith;Le'Roy E. Reese

  • The multisite violence prevention project: impact of a universal school-based violence prevention program on social-cognitive outcomes.

    Thomas R. Simon;Robin M. Ikeda;Emilie Phillips Smith;Le'Roy E. Reese

  • Preventing Youth Violence in a Multicultural Society.

    Nancy G. Guerra;Emilie Phillips Smith

  • SPECIAL SECTION Cultural Processes in Parenting and Youth Outcomes: Examining a Model of Racial-Ethnic Socialization and Identity in Diverse Populations

    James Rodriguez;Emilie Phillips Smith;Deborah J. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald J. Prinz
Ronald J. Prinz University of South Carolina
Margaret O Brien Caughy
Margaret O Brien Caughy University of Georgia
D. Wayne Osgood
D. Wayne Osgood Pennsylvania State University
David L. Rabiner
David L. Rabiner Duke University
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University
Patrick H. Tolan
Patrick H. Tolan University of Virginia
Deborah Gorman-Smith
Deborah Gorman-Smith University of Chicago
William S. Davidson
William S. Davidson Michigan State University
Linda L. Caldwell
Linda L. Caldwell Pennsylvania State University
Steven R. Asher
Steven R. Asher Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right psychology program is essential for both academic success and long-term career goals. Many students consider affordability, location, and program reputation when exploring online degree options. For those seeking budget-friendly alternatives, reviewing the cheapest psychology degrees in Vermont can help lower student debt while gaining a quality education.

Popularity and demand for specific psychology programs also play a crucial role in decision-making. In North Carolina, a number of popular psychology degrees in Charlotte offer diverse specializations and flexible learning formats. Meanwhile, those looking for top-tier programs might explore the best-ranked psychology degree programs in Washington, D.C. for prestigious academic opportunities and strong professional networks.

If proximity to the Northeast is a priority, you may want to look at the most popular psychology degree programs in Delaware, which blend accessibility with robust curricula.

By comparing factors like program cost, popularity, and recognition, students can make informed decisions about which online psychology degree will best suit their interests and set the stage for rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Emilie Phillips Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles