World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
11725
World Ranking
4811
National Ranking
2238

Atul Prakash publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Atul Prakash sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 204 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Atul Prakash D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Atul Prakash sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Atul Prakash is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions in several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, Sociology and Political Science, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Their main topics of study cover a range of specialized areas including:

  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques

Atul Prakash has contributed extensively to various publication venues with a notable number of papers appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Security & Privacy
  • Journal of Business Research
  • International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
  • Atlantis Highlights in Computer Sciences/Atlantis highlights in computer sciences

Recent papers published by Atul Prakash include:

  • Exploring healthcare/health-product ecommerce satisfaction: A text mining and machine learning application, 2020, Journal of Business Research
  • Perspectives on the SolarWinds Incident, 2021, IEEE Security & Privacy
  • Distributed Simulation Platforms and Data Passing Tools for Natural Hazards Engineering: Reviews, Limitations, and Recommendations, 2021, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
  • Dispelling Misconceptions and Characterizing the Failings of Deepfake Detection, 2021, IEEE Security & Privacy
  • A Study of Communication Protocols for Internet of Things (IoT) Devices: Review, 2021, Atlantis Highlights in Computer Sciences/Atlantis highlights in computer sciences

The scientist frequently collaborates with a set of co-authors, including Neal Mangaokar, Ryan Feng, Somesh Jha, Haizhong Zheng, and Kassem Fawaz.

Best Publications

  • Robust Physical-World Attacks on Deep Learning Visual Classification

    Kevin Eykholt;Ivan Evtimov;Earlence Fernandes;Bo Li

  • Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home Applications

    Earlence Fernandes;Jaeyeon Jung;Atul Prakash

  • Robust Physical-World Attacks on Deep Learning Models

    Ivan Evtimov;Kevin Eykholt;Earlence Fernandes;Tadayoshi Kohno

  • ContexIoT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT Platforms

    Yunhan Jack Jia;Qi Alfred Chen;Shiqi Wang;Amir Rahmati

  • Robust Physical-World Attacks on Machine Learning Models.

    Ivan Evtimov;Kevin Eykholt;Earlence Fernandes;Tadayoshi Kohno

  • A framework for source code search using program patterns

    S. Paul;A. Prakash

  • Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectors

    Dawn Song;Kevin Eykholt;Ivan Evtimov;Earlence Fernandes

  • Method and system for determining and enforcing security policy in a communication session

    Patrick D. Mcdaniel;Atul Prakash

  • FlowFence: practical data protection for emerging IoT application frameworks

    Earlence Fernandes;Justin Paupore;Amir Rahmati;Daniel Simionato

  • Software Engineering: Problems and Perspectives

    Ramamoorthy;Prakash;Wei-Tek Tsai;Usuda

  • DistEdit: a distributed toolkit for supporting multiple group editors

    Michael J. Knister;Atul Prakash

  • A framework for undoing actions in collaborative systems

    Atul Prakash;Michael J. Knister

  • Web tap: detecting covert web traffic

    Kevin Borders;Atul Prakash

  • Methods and limitations of security policy reconciliation

    Patrick McDaniel;Atul Prakash

  • DistView: support for building efficient collaborative applications using replicated objects

    Atul Prakash;Hyong Sop Shim

  • Social networks and context-aware spam

    Garrett Brown;Travis Howe;Micheal Ihbe;Atul Prakash

  • Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectors

    Kevin Eykholt;Ivan Evtimov;Earlence Fernandes;Bo Li

  • Antigone: a flexible framework for secure group communication

    Patrick McDaniel;Atul Prakash;Peter Honeyman

  • Methods and limitations of security policy reconciliation

    P. MDaniel;A. Prakash

  • Supporting multi-user, multi-applet workspaces in CBE

    Jang Ho Lee;Atul Prakash;Trent Jaeger;Gwobaw Wu

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick McDaniel
Patrick McDaniel University of Wisconsin–Madison
Trent Jaeger
Trent Jaeger Pennsylvania State University
Tadayoshi Kohno
Tadayoshi Kohno University of Washington
Dawn Song
Dawn Song University of California, Berkeley
Farnam Jahanian
Farnam Jahanian Carnegie Mellon University
Gary M. Olson
Gary M. Olson University of California, Irvine
Jerome P. Lynch
Jerome P. Lynch University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
C. R. Clauer
C. R. Clauer Virginia Tech
Timothy L Killeen
Timothy L Killeen National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can start with flexible learning options. Many students choose 2 year online degrees to quickly build foundational skills and enter the tech workforce. These programs are designed to balance academic rigor with accessibility for busy students.

If you already have a background in computer science, consider a shortest online masters degree to accelerate your advancement. These fast-paced programs allow you to gain specialized knowledge and credentials in less time than traditional pathways, helping you stand out in competitive job markets.

For those focused on career impact, researching the most worthwhile masters degrees is important. In-demand masters programs, especially in fields like data science, artificial intelligence, and software engineering, are highly valued by employers seeking qualified professionals.

Affordability is also a key concern. Thankfully, there are many affordable online colleges that offer accredited computer science degrees. These options make it possible to earn your degree without overwhelming student debt, enhancing your return on investment.

Best Scientists Citing Atul Prakash

Trending Scientists