World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

C. R. Clauer publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. R. Clauer sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

C. R. Clauer D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where C. R. Clauer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

C. R. Clauer is affiliated with Virginia Tech in the United States and conducts research primarily within the fields of Physics and Astronomy as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Geophysics, Aerospace Engineering, and Atmospheric Science.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • GNSS positioning and interference
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate

Clauer's recent papers cover aspects of interhemispheric magnetic phenomena and their consequences for geomagnetic induced currents (GICs), with a notable focus on space weather and magnetospheric dynamics. Selected publications include:

  • Interhemispheric Comparisons of Large Nighttime Magnetic Perturbation Events Relevant to GICs, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Interhemispheric Asymmetries in the Ground Magnetic Response to Interplanetary Shocks: The Role of Shock Impact Angle, 2020, Space Weather
  • Interhemispheric Asymmetry Due To IMF By Within the Cusp Spherical Elementary Currents, 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Geomagnetic Disturbances That Cause GICs: Investigating Their Interhemispheric Conjugacy and Control by IMF Orientation, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • The 2021 Antarctic Total Eclipse: Ground Magnetometer and GNSS Wave Observations From the 40 Degree Magnetic Meridian, 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

The principal venues in which Clauer publishes include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Space Weather
  • Earth and Space Science
  • Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences

Frequent collaborators in Clauer's research efforts include Michael D. Hartinger, Shane Coyle, Zhonghua Xu, M. P. Freeman, and J. M. Weygand. These coauthors appear recurrently across various publications, indicating ongoing joint work within the domains of geomagnetic and space physics.

Best Publications

  • Space Weather Modeling Framework: A new tool for the space science community

    Gábor Tóth;Igor V. Sokolov;Tamas I. Gombosi;David R. Chesney

  • Ionospheric traveling convection vortices observed near the polar cleft: A triggered response to sudden changes in the solar wind

    E. Friis-Christensen;M. A. McHenry;C. R. Clauer;S. Vennerstrøm

  • A statistical study of the ionospheric convection response to changing interplanetary magnetic field conditions using the assimilative mapping of ionospheric electrodynamics technique

    A. J. Ridley;Gang Lu;C. R. Clauer;V. O. Papitashvili

  • Mapping the local time‐universal time development of magnetospheric substorms using mid‐latitude magnetic observations

    C. Robert Clauer;Robert L. McPherron

  • The low‐latitude boundary layer and the boundary plasma sheet at low altitude: Prenoon precipitation regions and convection reversal boundaries

    Patrick T. Newell

  • Dst of the Carrington storm of 1859

    G. Siscoe;N.U. Crooker;C.R. Clauer

  • DP 1 and DP 2 current systems for the March 22, 1979 substorms

    C. R. Clauer;Y. Kamide

  • Solar wind control of auroral zone geomagnetic activity

    C. Robert Clauer;Robert L. McPherron;Craig Searls;Margaret G. Kivelson

  • Multistep Dst development and ring current composition changes during the 4–6 June 1991 magnetic storm

    J. U. Kozyra;M. W. Liemohn;C. R. Clauer;A. J. Ridley

  • Computational analysis of the near-Earth magnetospheric current system during two-phase decay storms

    M. W. Liemohn;J. U. Kozyra;C. R. Clauer;A. J. Ridley

  • Modeled ground magnetic signatures of flux transfer events

    Unknown

  • Ionospheric convection during nonsteady interplanetary magnetic field conditions

    A. J. Ridley;Gang Lu;C. R. Clauer;V. O. Papitashvili

  • Solution-adaptive magnetohydrodynamics for space plasmas: Sun-to-Earth simulations

    T.I. Gombosi;K.G. Powell;D.L. De Zeeuw;C.R. Clauer

  • Solar wind control of the low-latitude asymmetric magnetic disturbance field

    C. Robert Clauer;Robert L. McPherron;Craig Searls

  • Ground observations of magnetospheric boundary layer phenomena

    Mark A. McHenry;C. Robert Clauer;Eigil Friis-Christensen;Patrick T. Newell

  • IMF control of geomagnetic activity

    R.L. McPherron;D.N. Baker;L.F. Bargatze;C.R. Clauer

  • Relationship of the interplanetary electric field to the high-latitude ionospheric electric field and currents: observations and model simulation

    C. Robert Clauer;Peter M. Banks

  • Ionospheric control of the magnetospheric configuration: Thermospheric neutral winds

    A. J. Ridley;A. D. Richmond;T. I. Gombosi;D. L. De Zeeuw

  • The UARS particle environment monitor

    J. D. Winningham;J. R. Sharber;R. A. Frahm;J. L. Burch

  • The interplanetary electric field, cleft currents and plasma convection in the polar caps

    P.M. Banks;T. Araki;C.R. Clauer;J.P.St. Maurice

  • The relative importance of the interplanetary electric field and magnetospheric substorms on partial ring current development

    C. Robert Clauer;Robert L. McPherron

  • Observation of interplanetary magnetic field and of ionospheric plasma convection in the vicinity of the dayside polar cleft

    C. R. Clauer;P. M. Banks;A. Q. Smith;T. S. Jorgensen

  • Multi‐instrument analysis of the ionospheric signatures of a hot flow anomaly occurring on July 24, 1996

    R J Sitar;J B Baker;C R Clauer;A J Ridley

  • Characterizing the 18 April 2002 storm-time sawtooth events using ground magnetic data

    C. Robert Clauer;Xia Cai;Daniel Welling;Anna DeJong

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron J. Ridley
Aaron J. Ridley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Tamas I. Gombosi
Tamas I. Gombosi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael W. Liemohn
Michael W. Liemohn University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Daniel R. Weimer
Daniel R. Weimer Virginia Tech
Janet U. Kozyra
Janet U. Kozyra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
J. M. Ruohoniemi
J. M. Ruohoniemi Virginia Tech
Marc R. Hairston
Marc R. Hairston The University of Texas at Dallas
Robert L. McPherron
Robert L. McPherron University of California, Los Angeles
Michelle F. Thomsen
Michelle F. Thomsen Planetary Science Institute
Mike Lockwood
Mike Lockwood University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, and many students complement their studies with related online degrees. For veterans seeking flexibility, programs like the veteran friendly online photography degree offer creative outlets that can blend well with geological fieldwork and environmental documentation.

Language skills are increasingly valuable in global scientific collaboration. Pursuing online spanish degree for military veterans or general online degrees in spanish can enhance communication with diverse communities and improve job prospects in environmental consulting and research.

Creative disciplines also complement scientific study. Many students explore an online mfa creative writing to develop skills in science communication, which is vital for raising public awareness about Earth science issues and policy advocacy.

Combining Earth Science with related online degrees encourages multidisciplinary expertise and broadens career pathways from research to education, media, and technical roles in both the public and private sectors.

Best Scientists Citing C. R. Clauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles