World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
48
Citations
8696
World Ranking
3809
National Ranking
1499

Michael W. Liemohn publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Liemohn sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 441 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Michael W. Liemohn D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael W. Liemohn sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael W. Liemohn is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Physics and Astronomy, with significant contributions to subfields including Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology, Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, and Aerospace Engineering.

Their main topics of investigation encompass:

  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Astro and Planetary Science
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Space exploration and regulation
  • Planetary Science and Exploration

Michael W. Liemohn has published extensively in various academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Space Weather
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Eos

Several recent papers exemplify their research contributions:

  • RMSE is not enough: Guidelines to robust data-model comparisons for magnetospheric physics, 2021, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
  • What sustained multi-disciplinary research can achieve: The space weather modeling framework, 2021, Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
  • Conductance Model for Extreme Events: Impact of Auroral Conductance on Space Weather Forecasts, 2020, Space Weather
  • Incorporating Physical Knowledge Into Machine Learning for Planetary Space Physics, 2020, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
  • Worst-Case Severe Environments for Surface Charging Observed at LANL Satellites as Dependent on Solar Wind and Geomagnetic Conditions, 2021, Space Weather

Their work includes collaboration with frequent co-authors such as:

  • Natalia Ganushkina
  • Agnit Mukhopadhyay
  • Abigail Azari
  • D. T. Welling
  • Raluca Ilie

In addition to journal articles, Michael W. Liemohn has contributed to book publications, including a work published by Frontiers Media titled Driving Towards a More Diverse Space Physics Research Community - Perspectives, Initiatives, Strategies, and Actions in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Dominant role of the asymmetric ring current in producing the stormtime Dst

    M. W. Liemohn;J. U. Kozyra;M. F. Thomsen;J. L. Roeder

  • Geomagnetic storms driven by ICME- and CIR-dominated solar wind

    Michael H. Denton;Michael H. Denton;Joseph E. Borovsky;R. M. Skoug;M. F. Thomsen

  • How Hospitable Are Space Weather Affected Habitable Zones? The Role of Ion Escape

    Vladimir S. Airapetian;Alex Glocer;George V. Khazanov;Robert O Parke Loyd

  • Analysis of early phase ring current recovery mechanisms during geomagnetic storms

    M. W. Liemohn;J. U. Kozyra;V. K. Jordanova;G. V. Khazanov

  • Bulk plasma properties at geosynchronous orbit.

    Michael H. Denton;M. F. Thomsen;H. Korth;S. Lynch

  • A model‐derived storm time asymmetric ring current driven electric field description

    A. J. Ridley;M. W. Liemohn

  • Ring current energy input and decay

    Janet U. Kozyra;Michael W. Liemohn

  • Multistep Dst development and ring current composition changes during the 4–6 June 1991 magnetic storm

    J. U. Kozyra;M. W. Liemohn;C. R. Clauer;A. J. Ridley

  • RMSE is not enough: Guidelines to robust data-model comparisons for magnetospheric physics

    Michael W. Liemohn;Alexander D. Shane;Abigail R. Azari;Alicia K. Petersen;Alicia K. Petersen

  • Martian low‐altitude magnetic topology deduced from MAVEN/SWEA observations

    Shaosui Xu;David Mitchell;Michael Liemohn;Xiaohua Fang

  • A comparison of global models for the solar wind interaction with Mars

    D. Brain;S. Barabash;A. Boesswetter;S. Bougher

  • Intense space storms: Critical issues and open disputes

    I. A. Daglis;J. U. Kozyra;Y. Kamide;D. Vassiliadis

  • Current Systems in the Earth's Magnetosphere

    N. Yu. Ganushkina;N. Yu. Ganushkina;M. W. Liemohn;S. Dubyagin

  • Computational analysis of the near-Earth magnetospheric current system during two-phase decay storms

    M. W. Liemohn;J. U. Kozyra;C. R. Clauer;A. J. Ridley

  • A statistical study of the geoeffectiveness of magnetic clouds during high solar activity years

    Jichun Zhang;Michael W. Liemohn;Janet U. Kozyra;Benjamin J. Lynch

  • Pickup oxygen ion velocity space and spatial distribution around Mars

    Xiaohua Fang;Xiaohua Fang;Michael W. Liemohn;Andrew F. Nagy;Yingjuan Ma;Yingjuan Ma

  • Locations of Atmospheric Photoelectron Energy Peaks Within the Mars Environment

    R.A. Frahm;J.R. Sharber;J.D. Winningham;Peter Wurz

  • Dependence of plasmaspheric morphology on the electric field description during the recovery phase of the 17 April 2002 magnetic storm

    Michael W. Liemohn;Aaron J. Ridley;Dennis L. Gallagher;Daniel M. Ober

  • What sustained multi-disciplinary research can achieve: The space weather modeling framework

    Tamas I. Gombosi;Yuxi Chen;Alex Glocer;Zhenguang Huang

  • The Earth: Plasma Sources, Losses, and Transport Processes

    Daniel T. Welling;Mats André;Iannis Dandouras;Dominique Delcourt

  • Transport of the plasma sheet electrons to the geostationary distances

    N. Y. Ganushkina;N. Y. Ganushkina;O. A. Amariutei;Y. Y. Shprits;M. W. Liemohn

Frequent Co-Authors

Janet U. Kozyra
Janet U. Kozyra University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Aaron J. Ridley
Aaron J. Ridley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michelle F. Thomsen
Michelle F. Thomsen Planetary Science Institute
Yingjuan Ma
Yingjuan Ma University of California, Los Angeles
David L. Mitchell
David L. Mitchell University of California, Berkeley
Tamas I. Gombosi
Tamas I. Gombosi University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Stephen W. Bougher
Stephen W. Bougher University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Andrew F. Nagy
Andrew F. Nagy University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Dennis L. Gallagher
Dennis L. Gallagher Marshall Space Flight Center
Janet G. Luhmann
Janet G. Luhmann University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens up diverse career paths, but many students also explore related disciplines online to broaden their expertise. For example, aspiring information specialists may look into ala accredited schools that offer Master's in Library and Information Science (MLIS) degrees. These programs provide essential skills in data management and research techniques that complement Earth Science knowledge.

For those wondering, is a library science degree worth it can be a key question. Many find it valuable, especially when paired with environmental data curation roles within museums or research libraries devoted to Earth Science.

Additionally, creative fields intersect with Earth Science careers through fields like geographic visualization and environmental photography. Programs listed under cheapest online photography degree offer affordable ways to gain expertise in capturing natural landscapes, aiding conservation efforts and scientific documentation.

Veterans interested in combining military skills with environmental careers can benefit from resources about online photography degrees for veterans. These programs provide tailored support while enhancing skills useful in Earth Science communications and monitoring.

Best Scientists Citing Michael W. Liemohn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles