World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
82
Citations
33383
World Ranking
178
National Ranking
9

Keith Worden publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Worden sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 758 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Keith Worden D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Worden sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Keith Worden is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly spans the fields of Engineering and Computer Science, with a particular focus on several subfields including Civil and Structural Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, and Statistics, Probability, and Uncertainty.

The scientist's main topics of research include Structural Health Monitoring Techniques, Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring, Concrete Corrosion and Durability, Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design, Non-Destructive Testing Techniques, Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation, and Fault Detection and Control Systems.

Keith Worden has published extensively in several academic venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Data-Centric Engineering

Their recent papers illustrate ongoing work in engineering dynamics, structural health monitoring, and population-based SHM (Structural Health Monitoring):

  • Digital Twins: State-of-the-Art and Future Directions for Modeling and Simulation in Engineering Dynamics Applications (2020), ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering
  • On the application of domain adaptation in structural health monitoring (2020), Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
  • Foundations of population-based SHM, Part III: Heterogeneous populations - Mapping and transfer (2020), Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
  • Foundations of population-based SHM, Part I: Homogeneous populations and forms (2020), Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
  • Foundations of Population-based SHM, Part II: Heterogeneous populations - Graphs, networks, and communities (2020), Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Keith Worden collaborates frequently with several co-authors. The regular collaborators include:

  • Nikolaos Dervilis
  • Elizabeth J. Cross
  • Lawrence A. Bull
  • Paul Gardner
  • Timothy J. Rogers

Best Publications

  • An introduction to structural health monitoring

    Charles R Farrar;Keith Worden

  • Structural Health Monitoring: A Machine Learning Perspective

    Charles R. Farrar;Keith Worden

  • Past, present and future of nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics

    Gaëtan Kerschen;Keith Worden;Alexander F. Vakakis;Alexander F. Vakakis;Jean Claude Golinval

  • Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification and Modelling

    K Worden;G.R Tomlinson

  • Structural Health Monitoring

    Unknown

  • The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring

    Keith Worden;Charles R Farrar;Graeme Manson;Gyuhae Park

  • DAMAGE DETECTION USING OUTLIER ANALYSIS

    K. Worden;G. Manson;N.R.J. Fieller

  • Structural Health Monitoring Using Statistical Pattern Recognition Techniques

    Hoon Sohn;Charles R. Farrar;Norman F. Hunter;Keith Worden

  • An Overview of Intelligent Fault Detection in Systems and Structures

    K. Worden;J. M. Dulieu-Barton

  • Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics

    K Worden;G R Tomlinson

  • The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring

    Keith Worden;Graeme Manson

  • Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability

    Eloi Figueiredo;Gyuhae Park;Charles R Farrar;Keith Worden

  • TIME–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS IN GEARBOX FAULT DETECTION USING THE WIGNER–VILLE DISTRIBUTION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION

    W.J. Staszewski;K. Worden;G.R. Tomlinson

  • Optimal sensor placement for fault detection

    K Worden;A.P Burrows

  • Long-term monitoring and data analysis of the Tamar Bridge

    E.J. Cross;K.Y. Koo;J.M.W. Brownjohn;K. Worden

  • STRUCTURAL FAULT DETECTION USING A NOVELTY MEASURE

    K. Worden

  • Statistical Damage Classification Under Changing Environmental and Operational Conditions

    Hoon Sohn;Keith Worden;Charles R. Farrar

  • Natural computing for mechanical systems research: A tutorial overview

    Keith Worden;Wieslaw J. Staszewski;James J. Hensman

  • EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING METHODOLOGY: PART I. NOVELTY DETECTION ON A LABORATORY STRUCTURE

    K. Worden;G. Manson;D. Allman

  • Structural health monitoring algorithm comparisons using standard data sets

    Eloi Figueiredo;Gyuhae Park;Joaquim Figueiras;Charles Farrar

  • Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment

    L. E. Mujica;J. Vehi;M. Ruiz;Michel Verleysen

  • 13. Fundamental Axioms of Structural Health Monitoring

    Charles R. Farrar;Keith Worden

Frequent Co-Authors

Elizabeth J. Cross
Elizabeth J. Cross University of Sheffield
Nikolaos Dervilis
Nikolaos Dervilis University of Sheffield
Charles R. Farrar
Charles R. Farrar Los Alamos National Laboratory
Wieslaw J. Staszewski
Wieslaw J. Staszewski AGH University of Science and Technology
Hoon Sohn
Hoon Sohn Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
David J. Wagg
David J. Wagg University of Sheffield
Gyuhae Park
Gyuhae Park Chonnam National University
Neil D. Sims
Neil D. Sims University of Sheffield
Brian Culshaw
Brian Culshaw University of Strathclyde
Mohamed Thariq Hameed Sultan
Mohamed Thariq Hameed Sultan Universiti Putra Malaysia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, many students explore diverse fields that combine analytical skills with human understanding. For those interested in law enforcement psychology, becoming an fbi profiler offers a unique career path blending behavioral analysis with investigative techniques.

Alternatively, careers in mental health are gaining prominence. Understanding the different types of counseling degrees can help prospective students choose the right specialization that fits their goals, whether in school counseling, marriage therapy, or clinical psychology.

For those seeking a less intensive path, identifying which counseling degree is easiest might be a consideration when balancing studies with other commitments. This insight can make a significant difference in successfully completing an online program.

Lastly, professionals aiming to expand their expertise may opt for an accelerated applied behavior analysis masters online, a growing field that applies behavioral science to improve outcomes in education, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Keith Worden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles