World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 37 2453 2295 181 164 178 4135

Elizabeth J. Cross publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth J. Cross between 1962 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth J. Cross published across 65 years, from 1962 to 2026, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2023. 10 of the 225 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2023. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 31 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
1962 2026

225 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth J. Cross: publications per year, 1962 to 2026
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 0
2008 0
2009 2
2010 0
2011 9
2012 9
2013 10
2014 6
2015 6
2016 9
2017 13
2018 5
2019 23
2020 27
2021 17
2022 27
2023 31
2024 15
2025 9
2026 1
Total 225
Download as CSV

Elizabeth J. Cross publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Cross sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 178 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130 178
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth J. Cross D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Cross sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127 37
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Long-term monitoring and data analysis of the Tamar Bridge

    E.J. Cross;K.Y. Koo;J.M.W. Brownjohn;K. Worden

  • Cointegration: a novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data

    Elizabeth J. Cross;Keith Worden;Qian Chen

  • Features for damage detection with insensitivity to environmental and operational variations

    Elizabeth Cross;Graham Manson;Keith Worden;Stephen Pierce

  • On robust regression analysis as a means of exploring environmental and operational conditions for SHM data

    N. Dervilis;K. Worden;E.J. Cross

  • Foundations of population-based SHM, Part I : homogeneous populations and forms

    L.A. Bull;P.A. Gardner;J. Gosliga;T.J. Rogers

  • Improving aircraft performance using machine learning: A review

    Unknown

  • On switching response surface models, with applications to the structural health monitoring of bridges

    K. Worden;E.J. Cross

  • Probabilistic modelling of wind turbine power curves with application of heteroscedastic Gaussian Process regression

    T.J. Rogers;P. Gardner;N. Dervilis;K. Worden

  • A Bayesian non-parametric clustering approach for semi-supervised Structural Health Monitoring

    T.J. Rogers;K. Worden;R. Fuentes;N. Dervilis

  • Linear approaches to modeling nonlinearities in long-term monitoring of bridges

    Unknown

  • Damage detection in operational wind turbine blades using a new approach based on machine learning

    Kartik Chandrasekhar;Nevena Stevanovic;Elizabeth J. Cross;Nikolaos Dervilis

  • A multiresolution approach to cointegration for enhanced SHM of structures under varying conditions – An exploratory study

    K. Worden;E.J. Cross;I. Antoniadou;A. Kyprianou

  • A regime-switching cointegration approach for removing environmental and operational variations in structural health monitoring

    Haichen Shi;Keith Worden;Elizabeth J. Cross

  • Prediction of Landing Gear Loads Using Machine Learning Techniques

    Geoffrey K T Holmes;Pia N Sartor;Stephen Reed;Paul J D Southern

  • Equation discovery for nonlinear dynamical systems: A Bayesian viewpoint

    R. Fuentes;R. Nayek;P. Gardner;N. Dervilis

  • Probabilistic active learning : an online framework for structural health monitoring

    L.A. Bull;T.J. Rogers;C. Wickramarachchi;E.J. Cross

  • On the application of Gaussian process latent force models for joint input-state-parameter estimation: With a view to Bayesian operational identification

    T.J. Rogers;K. Worden;E.J. Cross

  • On evolutionary system identification with applications to nonlinear benchmarks

    K. Worden;R.J. Barthorpe;E.J. Cross;N. Dervilis

  • Robust methods of inclusive outlier analysis for structural health monitoring

    N. Dervilis;E.J. Cross;R.J. Barthorpe;K. Worden

  • Detection of sub-surface damage in wind turbine bearings using acoustic emissions and probabilistic modelling

    R. Fuentes;R.S. Dwyer-Joyce;M.B. Marshall;J. Wheals

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith Worden
Keith Worden University of Sheffield
Nikolaos Dervilis
Nikolaos Dervilis University of Sheffield
David J. Wagg
David J. Wagg University of Sheffield
Pam Enderby
Pam Enderby University of Sheffield
Charles R. Farrar
Charles R. Farrar Los Alamos National Laboratory
James M. W. Brownjohn
James M. W. Brownjohn University of Exeter
Jon Nicholl
Jon Nicholl University of Sheffield
Steven A. Julious
Steven A. Julious University of Sheffield
Simon Capewell
Simon Capewell University of Liverpool
Eleni Chatzi
Eleni Chatzi ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in engineering, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs like the best 5 year speech pathology programs highlight how interdisciplinary skills can benefit fields beyond traditional engineering roles.

Those considering alternative career routes might find insights in understanding professions such as criminal profiling. The article on criminal profiler salary offers a look into a niche yet intriguing career that emphasizes analytical thinking, a skill also critical in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering.

Another area worth exploring is counseling. There are many options available, from specialized tracks to more accessible programs. Resources like the comprehensive guide on degrees in counseling and the list of best easiest counseling degree programs can help students weigh their interests against program demands and career goals.

By considering these related fields, students can broaden their skillset and find meaningful career opportunities that align with their passions and strengths.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth J. Cross

Recently Published Articles