World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
94
Citations
32978
World Ranking
10476
National Ranking
1001

Nicholas L. Mills publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas L. Mills sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 486 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nicholas L. Mills D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas L. Mills sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas L. Mills is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the medical field, with a strong emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's work spans several subfields, including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

Nicholas L. Mills has published extensively in several leading scientific journals. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • European Heart Journal
  • European Heart Journal Acute Cardiovascular Care
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Nicholas L. Mills include:

  • Risks of myocarditis, pericarditis, and cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Myocardial Infarction, 2020, Circulation
  • Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19, 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Adverse health effects associated with household air pollution: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and burden estimation study, 2020, The Lancet Global Health
  • Outcomes among confirmed cases and a matched comparison group in the Long-COVID in Scotland study, 2022, Nature Communications

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • David E. Newby
  • Atul Anand
  • Anoop Shah
  • Andrew R. Chapman
  • Ryan Wereski

Best Publications

  • Global association of air pollution and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Anoop S V Shah;Jeremy P Langrish;Harish Nair;Harish Nair;David A McAllister

  • Combustion-derived nanoparticles: A review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure

    Ken Donaldson;Lang Tran;Luis Albert Jimenez;Rodger Duffin

  • 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial

    Nikhil V Joshi;Alex T Vesey;Michelle C Williams;Anoop S V Shah

  • Adverse cardiovascular effects of air pollution

    Nicholas L Mills;Ken Donaldson;Paddy W Hadoke;Nicholas A Boon

  • Expert position paper on air pollution and cardiovascular disease

    David E. Newby;Pier M. Mannucci;Grethe S. Tell;Andrea A. Baccarelli

  • Short term exposure to air pollution and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Anoop S V Shah;Kuan Ken Lee;David A McAllister;Amanda Hunter

  • Ischemic and Thrombotic Effects of Dilute Diesel-Exhaust Inhalation in Men with Coronary Heart Disease

    Nicholas L. Mills;Håkan Törnqvist;Manuel C. Gonzalez;Elen Vink

  • Diesel exhaust inhalation causes vascular dysfunction and impaired endogenous fibrinolysis.

    Nicholas L. Mills;Håkan Törnqvist;Simon D. Robinson;Manuel Gonzalez

  • Global Burden of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in People Living With HIV: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Anoop S. V. Shah;Dominik Stelzle;Kuan Ken Lee;Eduard J. Beck

  • High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study

    Anoop S V Shah;Atul Anand;Yader Sandoval;Kuan Ken Lee

  • Inhaled Nanoparticles Accumulate at Sites of Vascular Disease

    Mark R. Miller;Jennifer B. Raftis;Jeremy P. Langrish;Steven G. McLean

  • Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Multicenter SCOT-HEART Trial (Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART).

    Michelle C. Williams;Jacek Kwiecinski;Mhairi Doris;Priscilla McElhinney

  • High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study

    Anoop S V Shah;Megan Griffiths;Kuan Ken Lee;David A McAllister

  • Persistent endothelial dysfunction in humans after diesel exhaust inhalation.

    Håkan Törnqvist;Nicholas L Mills;Manuel Gonzalez;Mark R Miller

  • Do inhaled carbon nanoparticles translocate directly into the circulation in humans

    Nicholas L Mills;Nadia Amin;Simon D Robinson;Atul Anand

  • Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19.

    Marc R. Dweck;Anda Bularga;Rebecca T Hahn;Rong Bing

  • Implementation of a sensitive troponin I assay and risk of recurrent myocardial infarction and death in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome.

    Nicholas L. Mills;Antonia M. D. Churchhouse;Kuan Ken Lee;Atul Anand

  • Arterial Stiffness Is Independently Associated with Emphysema Severity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    David A. McAllister;John D. Maclay;Nicholas L. Mills;Grant Mair

  • High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women

    Anoop S V Shah;Megan Griffiths;Kuan Ken Lee;David A McAllister

  • Response to Letter Regarding Article “Diesel Exhaust Inhalation Causes Vascular Dysfunction and Impaired Endogenous Fibrinolysis”

    Nicholas L. Mills;Simon D. Robinson;Nicholas A. Boon;David E. Newby

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Newby
David E. Newby University of Edinburgh
Anders Blomberg
Anders Blomberg University of Gothenburg
Marc R. Dweck
Marc R. Dweck University of Edinburgh
Thomas Sandström
Thomas Sandström Umeå University
Ken Donaldson
Ken Donaldson University of Edinburgh
Keith A.A. Fox
Keith A.A. Fox University of Edinburgh
William MacNee
William MacNee University of Edinburgh
Flemming R. Cassee
Flemming R. Cassee Utrecht University
Colin Berry
Colin Berry University of Glasgow
Edwin J. R. van Beek
Edwin J. R. van Beek University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of related healthcare careers and educational options online. For students interested in non-clinical roles, medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid offer a flexible and cost-effective entry into the healthcare field.

If becoming a nurse is your goal, but you’re concerned about entrance exams, consider an lpn school without teas test requirements. This pathway allows aspiring licensed practical nurses to start their careers quickly and efficiently.

Those interested in healthcare leadership can benefit from a healthcare administration accelerated degree. These programs are designed for speed and accessibility, helping you fast-track your management ambitions.

Registered nurses looking to advance their practice can explore rn to np bridge programs online. These programs are ideal for moving from an ADN to an MSN, making it easier to become a nurse practitioner without starting over.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas L. Mills

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles