World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
20941
World Ranking
18466
National Ranking
1674

Edwin J. R. van Beek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin J. R. van Beek sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 313 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edwin J. R. van Beek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin J. R. van Beek sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edwin J. R. van Beek is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their primary research contributions span the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, and Physiology.

The main topics of their work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research, Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments, and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications.

Frequent publication venues for Edwin J. R. van Beek's work are:

  • Radiology
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • CHEST Journal
  • Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography

They have collaborated often with several key researchers, including:

  • David E. Newby
  • Marc R. Dweck
  • Michelle C. Williams
  • Damini Dey
  • Piotr J. Slomka

Among recent publications, some notable works are:

  • Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Myocardial Infarction, 2020, Circulation
  • Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Thromboembolic Complications in COVID-19: Report of the National Institute for Public Health of the Netherlands, 2020, Radiology
  • Bone marrow adipose tissue is a unique adipose subtype with distinct roles in glucose homeostasis, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Expanding Applications of Pulmonary MRI in the Clinical Evaluation of Lung Disorders: Fleischner Society Position Paper, 2020, Radiology
  • Coronary 18F-Sodium Fluoride Uptake Predicts Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Best Publications

  • 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial

    Nikhil V Joshi;Alex T Vesey;Michelle C Williams;Anoop S V Shah

  • Coronary Arterial 18F-Sodium Fluoride Uptake : A Novel Marker of Plaque Biology

    Marc Dweck;Marcus W L Chow;Nik Joshi;Michelle Williams

  • Low-Attenuation Noncalcified Plaque on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Predicts Myocardial Infarction: Results From the Multicenter SCOT-HEART Trial (Scottish Computed Tomography of the HEART).

    Michelle C. Williams;Jacek Kwiecinski;Mhairi Doris;Priscilla McElhinney

  • Coronary Artery Plaque Characteristics Associated With Adverse Outcomes in the SCOT-HEART Study

    Michelle C. Williams;Michelle C. Williams;Alastair J. Moss;Marc Dweck;Philip D. Adamson

  • Clinical and Radiologic Disease in Smokers With Normal Spirometry

    Elizabeth A. Regan;David A. Lynch;Douglas Curran-Everett;Jeffrey L. Curtis;Jeffrey L. Curtis

  • Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Thromboembolic Complications in COVID-19: Report of the National Institute for Public Health of the Netherlands.

    Matthijs Oudkerk;Harry R Büller;Dirkjan Kuijpers;Nick van Es

  • A novel machine learning-derived radiotranscriptomic signature of perivascular fat improves cardiac risk prediction using coronary CT angiography

    Evangelos K. Oikonomou;Michelle C Williams;Michelle C Williams;Christos P. Kotanidis;Milind Y. Desai

  • Association between functional small airway disease and FEV1 decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Surya P. Bhatt;Xavier Soler;Xin Wang;Susan Murray

  • Assessment of Valvular Calcification and Inflammation by Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis

    Marc Richard Dweck;Charlotte Jones;Nikhil V. Joshi;Alison M. Fletcher

  • The clinical and genetic features of COPD-asthma overlap syndrome

    Megan Hardin;Michael Cho;Merry Lynn McDonald;Terri Beaty

  • Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Guide Management of Patients With Coronary Disease

    Michelle C. Williams;Amanda Hunter;Anoop S.V. Shah;Valentina Assi

  • The 7th lung cancer TNM classification and staging system: Review of the changes and implications

    Saeed Mirsadraee;Dilip Oswal;Yalda Alizadeh;Andrea Caulo

  • Functional MRI of the lung using hyperpolarized 3-helium gas.

    Edwin J.R. van Beek;Jim M. Wild;Hans-Ulrich Kauczor;Wolfgang Schreiber

  • Radiomics and its emerging role in lung cancer research, imaging biomarkers and clinical management: State of the art

    Geewon Lee;Geewon Lee;Ho Yun Lee;Hyunjin Park;Mark L. Schiebler

  • The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) Data Collection Process for Nodule Detection and Annotation

    Michael F. Mcnitt-Gray;Samuel G. Armato;Charles R. Meyer;Anthony P. Reeves

  • 18F-sodium fluoride uptake is a marker of active calcification and disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis.

    Marc Richard Dweck;William Stephen Arthur Jenkins;Alex T. Vesey;Mark A.H. Pringle

  • Prospective Study of Color Duplex Ultrasonography Compared with Contrast Venography in Patients Suspected of Having Deep Venous Thrombosis of the Upper Extremities

    Henk-Jan Baarslag;Edwin J R van Beek;Maria M W Koopman;Jim A Reekers

  • Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) of the human brain: technique, findings and clinical applications.

    Lucy Hiscox;Curtis L Johnson;Eric Barnhill;Matt Dj McGarry;Matt Dj McGarry

  • The Lung Image Database Consortium (LIDC) data collection process for nodule detection and annotation

    M. F. McNitt-Gray;S. G. Armato;C. R. Meyer;A. P. Reeves

  • Genetic landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identifies heterogeneous cell-type and phenotype associations

    Phuwanat Sakornsakolpat;Dmitry Prokopenko;Maxime Lamontagne;Nicola F. Reeve

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Newby
David E. Newby University of Edinburgh
Marc R. Dweck
Marc R. Dweck University of Edinburgh
Nicholas L. Mills
Nicholas L. Mills University of Edinburgh
David A. Lynch
David A. Lynch Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Edwin K. Silverman
Edwin K. Silverman Brigham and Women's Hospital
James D. Crapo
James D. Crapo National Jewish Health
Eric A. Hoffman
Eric A. Hoffman University of Iowa
William MacNee
William MacNee University of Edinburgh
Barry J. Make
Barry J. Make National Jewish Health
MeiLan K. Han
MeiLan K. Han University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but want flexible learning options, there are a variety of online degrees that can provide a pathway to healthcare roles. For those looking to rapidly enter the workforce, fast track lpn programs online can help you become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time than traditional routes.

For registered nurses seeking to specialize, accelerated msn psychiatric np programs allow you to advance toward a nurse practitioner role in the mental health field quickly and efficiently. These options are ideal for professionals aiming to upskill while balancing other commitments.

Interested in healthcare management? The cheapest mha programs online and other online mha programs affordable provide a cost-effective way to earn a master’s in healthcare administration. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in medical facilities, insurance companies, and public health organizations.

Online programs offer greater flexibility and accessibility, making it possible to pursue rewarding careers in healthcare without being tied to a physical campus.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin J. R. van Beek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles