World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Russell P. Bowler

Russell P. Bowler

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
22161
World Ranking
16732
National Ranking
8392

Russell P. Bowler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell P. Bowler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 527 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Russell P. Bowler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell P. Bowler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Russell P. Bowler is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these domains, Bowler's work focuses extensively on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, alongside significant contributions in Molecular Biology, Physiology, Genetics, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's main research topics include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research, Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, Asthma and respiratory diseases, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis, Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments, and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks.

Among the frequent co-authors collaborating with Bowler are:

  • MeiLan K. Han
  • Prescott G. Woodruff
  • Jeffrey L. Curtis
  • Eric A. Hoffman
  • Alejandro P. Comellas

Bowler has published extensively across several notable venues, including:

  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • CHEST Journal
  • UNC Libraries
  • Respiratory Research

Some of the recent papers featuring Bowler's research are:

  • Dynamic incorporation of multiple in silico functional annotations empowers rare variant association analysis of large whole-genome sequencing studies at scale (2020, Nature Genetics)
  • Comparison of Proteomic Assessment Methods in Multiple Cohort Studies (2020, PROTEOMICS)
  • Clonal haematopoiesis and risk of chronic liver disease (2023, Nature)
  • A high-resolution HLA reference panel capturing global population diversity enables multi-ancestry fine-mapping in HIV host response (2021, Nature Genetics)
  • Mucus Plugs and Emphysema in the Pathophysiology of Airflow Obstruction and Hypoxemia in Smokers (2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine)

This body of work reflects a sustained research focus on respiratory diseases and genetic epidemiology, supported by collaborations with several researchers active in related areas. Bowler's contributions include both clinical and molecular approaches to pulmonary health.

Best Publications

  • Oxidative stress in allergic respiratory diseases.

    Russell P. Bowler;James D. Crapo

  • The multiMiR R package and database: integration of microRNA–target interactions along with their disease and drug associations

    Yuanbin Ru;Katerina J. Kechris;Boris Tabakoff;Paula Hoffman

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations in the COPDGene Study: Associated Radiologic Phenotypes

    MeiLan K. Han;Ella A. Kazerooni;David A. Lynch;Lyrica X. Liu

  • Pulmonary arterial enlargement and acute exacerbations of COPD.

    J. Michael Wells;George R. Washko;Mei Lan K. Han;Naseer Abbas

  • Inflammatory triggers associated with exacerbations of COPD orchestrate plasticity of group 2 innate lymphoid cells in the lungs

    Jonathan S Silver;Jennifer Kearley;Alan M Copenhaver;Caroline Sanden

  • Clinical and Radiologic Disease in Smokers With Normal Spirometry

    Elizabeth A. Regan;David A. Lynch;Douglas Curran-Everett;Jeffrey L. Curtis;Jeffrey L. Curtis

  • Association between functional small airway disease and FEV1 decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Surya P. Bhatt;Xavier Soler;Xin Wang;Susan Murray

  • Frequency of exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: an analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort

    MeiLan K Han;Pedro M Quibrera;Elizabeth E Carretta;R Graham Barr

  • Dose-effect relationships between manganese exposure and neurological, neuropsychological and pulmonary function in confined space bridge welders.

    Rosemarie M Bowler;Harry A Roels;Sanae Nakagawa;Marija Drezgic

  • GOLD 2011 disease severity classification in COPDGene: a prospective cohort study.

    MeiLan K. Han;Hana Muellerova;Douglas Curran-Everett;Mark T. Dransfield

  • Association of sputum and blood eosinophil concentrations with clinical measures of COPD severity: an analysis of the SPIROMICS cohort.

    Annette T Hastie;Fernando J Martinez;Jeffrey L Curtis;Claire M Doerschuk

  • Acute Exacerbations and Lung Function Loss in Smokers with and without Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    Mark T. Dransfield;Mark T. Dransfield;Ken M. Kunisaki;Ken M. Kunisaki;Matthew J. Strand;Antonio Anzueto;Antonio Anzueto

  • Lovastatin Enhances Clearance of Apoptotic Cells (Efferocytosis) with Implications for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    Konosuke Morimoto;William J. Janssen;Michael B. Fessler;Kathleen A. McPhillips

  • Manganese neurotoxicity, a continuum of dysfunction: results from a community based study.

    Donna Mergler;M. Baldwin;S. Bélanger;F. Larribe

  • Extracellular superoxide dismutase (EC-SOD) binds to type i collagen and protects against oxidative fragmentation.

    Steen V. Petersen;Tim D. Oury;Louise Ostergaard;Zuzana Valnickova

  • Computed tomographic measures of pulmonary vascular morphology in smokers and their clinical implications.

    Raúl San José Estépar;Gregory L. Kinney;Jennifer L. Black-Shinn;Russell P. Bowler

  • Oxidative stress in airways: is there a role for extracellular superoxide dismutase?

    Russell P. Bowler;James D. Crapo

  • Interaction among nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species, and antioxidants during endotoxemia-related acute renal failure

    Wei Wang;Suparoek Jittikanont;Sandor A. Falk;Ping Li

  • Extracellular superoxide dismutase and oxidant damage in osteoarthritis.

    Elizabeth Regan;Joanne Flannelly;Russell Bowler;Karen Tran

  • Genetic landscape of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease identifies heterogeneous cell-type and phenotype associations

    Phuwanat Sakornsakolpat;Dmitry Prokopenko;Maxime Lamontagne;Nicola F. Reeve

Frequent Co-Authors

MeiLan K. Han
MeiLan K. Han University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James D. Crapo
James D. Crapo National Jewish Health
Mark T. Dransfield
Mark T. Dransfield University of Alabama at Birmingham
Jeffrey L. Curtis
Jeffrey L. Curtis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Fernando J. Martinez
Fernando J. Martinez University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Edwin K. Silverman
Edwin K. Silverman Brigham and Women's Hospital
R. Graham Barr
R. Graham Barr Columbia University
Barry J. Make
Barry J. Make National Jewish Health
Nadia N. Hansel
Nadia N. Hansel Johns Hopkins University
Prescott G. Woodruff
Prescott G. Woodruff University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have a growing number of flexible online education options that can launch or advance their healthcare careers. Many choose nursing as a rewarding and accessible starting point, and online programs make it easier than ever to enter this field without sacrificing work or family obligations.

Registered Nurses (RNs) looking to further their education and career opportunities can consider an rn to bsn online program, which allows nurses to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing in a flexible and affordable way. Those aiming for advanced practice roles might explore cheapest fnp programs online to become Family Nurse Practitioners, or review a range of affordable online nursing programs to find the best fit for their goals.

For nurses interested in leadership or academic roles, pursuing the cheapest dnp programs online can be a strategic move. With the flexibility and cost advantages of remote learning, online nursing degrees provide ample pathways to advance in the ever-evolving medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Russell P. Bowler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles