World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
43
Citations
8377
World Ranking
1967
National Ranking
61

John Komlos publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Komlos sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 271 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

John Komlos D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Komlos sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Komlos is a researcher primarily active in the field of Economics, Econometrics, and Finance, with a focus on subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, and Sociology and Political Science. Their work centers on topics including Economic Theory and Policy, Employment and Welfare Studies, Economic Theory and Institutions, Labor Market Dynamics and Wage Inequality, Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth, Fiscal Policies and Political Economy, and Income, Poverty, and Inequality.

They have published a number of papers across various journals and venues. Notable recent papers include:

  • The Actual U.S. Unemployment Rate in 2019 Was Twice the Official Rate, and the Phillips Curve (2021, Challenge)
  • Covert Racism in Economics (2021, FinanzArchiv Public Finance Analysis)
  • Foundations of Real-World Economics: What Every Economics Student Needs to Know (2025, The Pakistan Development Review)
  • Reaganomics - Wegbereiter des Trumpismus (2020, Wirtschaftsdienst)
  • Estimating the Socio-Economic Status of the U.S. Capitol Insurrectionists (2023, The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy)

They frequently publish in venues such as SSRN Electronic Journal, Wirtschaftsdienst, Challenge, Economic Record, and Economic Revival of Russia. Their collaborative work involves frequent co-authors including Hermann Schubert, Marek Brabec, and Leanne Schubert.

The publications reflect an interdisciplinary approach, spanning economic theory, policy analysis, and socio-economic studies, often engaging with topics relevant to employment, welfare, inequality, and fiscal issues. The scholar's research output demonstrates a sustained engagement with both theoretical frameworks and real-world economic phenomena over recent years.

Best Publications

  • Shrinking in a Growing Economy? The Mystery of Physical Stature during the Industrial Revolution

    John Komlos

  • Nutrition and Economic Development in the Eighteenth-Century Habsburg Monarchy

    John Komlos

  • Nutrition and Economic Development in the Eighteenth-Century Habsburg Monarchy: An Anthropometric History

    John Komlos

  • The Height and Weight of West Point Cadets: Dietary Change in Antebellum America

    John Komlos

  • Stature, Living Standards, and Economic Development: Essays in Anthropometric History

    John Komlos

  • OBESITY AND THE RATE OF TIME PREFERENCE: IS THERE A CONNECTION?

    John Komlos;Patricia K. Smith;Barry Bogin

  • From the tallest to (one of) the fattest: the enigmatic fate of the American population in the 20th century.

    John Komlos;Marieluise Baur

  • Stature and nutrition in the Habsburg monarchy: the standard of living and economic development in the eighteenth century.

    John Komlos

  • The secular trend in the biological standard of living in the United Kingdom, 1730-1860

    John Komlos

  • The Habsburg monarchy as a customs union

    John Komlos

  • Looking Backward and Looking Forward: Anthropometric Research and the Development of Social Science History

    John Komlos;Jorg Baten

  • Population and Nutrition: An Essay on European Demographic History.

    John Komlos;Massimo Livi-Bacci

  • How to (and How Not to) Analyze Deficient Height Samples

    John Komlos

  • The mysterious trend in American heights in the 20th century.

    John Komlos;Benjamin E. Lauderdale

  • An anthropometric history of early-modern France

    John Komlos

  • Population growth through history and the escape from the Malthusian trap: a homeostatic simulation model.

    Artzrouni M;Komlos J

  • Anomalies in Economic History: Toward a Resolution of the "Antebellum Puzzle"'

    John Komlos

  • On the Puzzling Cycle in the Biological Standard of Living: The Case of Antebellum Georgia

    John Komlos;Peter Coclanis

  • A compact macromodel of pre-industrial population growth.

    John Komlos;Sergey Nefedov

  • The Oxford Handbook of Economics and Human Biology

    John Komlos;Inas Kelly

  • Stature, Living Standards, and Economic Development: Essays in Anthropometric History.

    Peter Kirby;John Komlos

  • Nutrition and Economic Development in the Eighteenth-Century Habsburg Monarchy: An Anthropometric History.

    James C. Riley;John Komlos

  • The secular trend in the biological standard of living in the United

    John Komlos

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry Bogin
Barry Bogin Loughborough University
Joerg Baten
Joerg Baten University of Tübingen
Bjarne Andresen
Bjarne Andresen University of Copenhagen
Stephen Broadberry
Stephen Broadberry University of Oxford
Ngo Van Long
Ngo Van Long McGill University
Gabriel Felbermayr
Gabriel Felbermayr Austrian Institute of Economic Research
Franz Halberg
Franz Halberg University of Minnesota
Peter Davies
Peter Davies University of Queensland
Tim J. Cole
Tim J. Cole University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse online degree options, suited to a variety of goals and timelines. Many students wonder, how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology? Costs can vary significantly depending on the program, institution, and whether you qualify for in-state tuition or scholarships.

If you’re looking for efficiency, accelerated options are available. Those interested in a leadership or educational career might explore easiest edd programs, designed to be completed quickly without compromising on quality. For professionals seeking broader opportunities, online masters programs can be completed in just 12 months, offering a faster path to career advancement.

Undergraduates can also save time and expenses with accelerated online degree programs—ideal for motivated students wanting to enter the job market sooner. Online learning continues to expand, offering flexible options for all stages of your academic and professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing John Komlos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles