World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 50 2805 2564 1354 1220 183 8699

Ricardo Godoy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ricardo Godoy between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ricardo Godoy published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2001. 12 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2001. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
1983 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ricardo Godoy: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 2
1985 3
1986 2
1987 1
1988 3
1989 1
1990 2
1991 3
1992 9
1993 9
1994 2
1995 1
1996 3
1997 2
1998 7
1999 2
2000 5
2001 18
2002 6
2003 7
2004 8
2005 14
2006 11
2007 12
2008 10
2009 8
2010 6
2011 0
2012 4
2013 6
2014 2
2015 3
2016 6
2017 1
2018 3
2019 1
2020 4
2021 2
2022 1
2023 4
2024 4
2025 8
Total 207
Download as CSV

Ricardo Godoy publications per year - data summary

  • Ricardo Godoy, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Brandeis University, has 207 publications recorded across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1983 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2001, with 18 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1983, 1987, 1989, 1995 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 43 years in the span carries no publications at all (2011).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.9 per year counting only the 42 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 19 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1983-1997: 44 publications (2.9 per year); 1998-2012: 118 publications (7.9 per year); 2013-2025: 45 publications (3.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Ricardo Godoy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Godoy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–183 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 183 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313 183
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ricardo Godoy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 44–53 to 570+ publications.
  • Ricardo Godoy, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Brandeis University, records 183 publications - the 57th percentile of the discipline.
  • 57% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Ricardo Godoy, and about 43% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 164–173 publications range, and Ricardo Godoy ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 114–123 publications, holding 474 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 174–183 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 570 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Ricardo Godoy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Godoy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187 50
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Ricardo Godoy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 7,777 Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 71 ranges running from 30 to 100+ D-Index.
  • Ricardo Godoy, a Social Sciences and Humanities scholar from Brandeis University, records 50 D-Index - the 66th percentile of the discipline.
  • 66% of ranked Social Sciences and Humanities scientists score the same or lower than Ricardo Godoy, and about 34% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 45 D-Index range, and Ricardo Godoy ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 42 D-Index, holding 313 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more, 97 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Overview

Ricardo Godoy is affiliated with Brandeis University in the United States. Their research spans interdisciplinary fields including General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Nutrition and Dietetics, as well as Global and Planetary Change.

Their work addresses a variety of main topics such as Economic and Environmental Valuation, Child Nutrition and Water Access, Neuroscience and Music Perception, Multisensory Perception and Integration, Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Ricardo Godoy include:

  • Jonathan Bauchet
  • Eduardo A. Undurraga
  • Claudia Radel
  • William R. Leonard
  • Ariela Zycherman

Ricardo Godoy has published in several notable venues. These publication venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • World Development
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Communications
  • Nature Human Behaviour

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Ricardo Godoy include:

  • "Perceptual fusion of musical notes by native Amazonians suggests universal representations of musical intervals" (2020, Nature Communications)
  • "Commonality and variation in mental representations of music revealed by a cross-cultural comparison of rhythm priors in 15 countries" (2024, Nature Human Behaviour)
  • "The practice of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the Tropical Andes: Evidence from program administrators" (2020, Ecosystem Services)
  • "Does State Tightness-Looseness Predict Behavior and Attitudes Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic in the USA?" (2022, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology)
  • "The effect of gender targeting of food transfers on child nutritional status: experimental evidence from the Bolivian amazon" (2021, Journal of Development Effectiveness)

Best Publications

  • Indifference to dissonance in native Amazonians reveals cultural variation in music perception

    Josh H. McDermott;Alan F. Schultz;Eduardo A. Undurraga;Eduardo A. Undurraga;Ricardo A. Godoy

  • Role of prices and wealth in consumer demand for bushmeat in Gabon, central Africa

    David S Wilkie;Malcolm Starkey;Katharine Abernethy;Ernestine Nsame Effa

  • THE EFFECT OF MARKET ECONOMIES ON THE WELL-BEING OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES AND ON THEIR USE OF RENEWABLE NATURAL RESOURCES

    Ricardo Godoy;Victoria Reyes-García;Elizabeth Byron;William R. Leonard

  • Correlates of delay-discount rates: Evidence from Tsimane' Amerindians of the Bolivian rain forest

    Kris N Kirby;Ricardo Godoy;Victoria Reyes-Garcı́a;Elizabeth Byron

  • Valuation of consumption and sale of forest goods from a Central American rain forest

    Ricardo Godoy;David Wilkie;Han Overman;Adoni Cubas

  • Household determinants of deforestation by amerindians in honduras

    Ricardo Godoy;Kathleen O'neill;Stephen Groff;Peter Kostishack

  • Income and price elasticities of bushmeat demand in lowland Amerindian societies

    David S. Wilkie;Ricardo A. Godoy

  • Toward a Cultural Ecology of Mountains: The Central Andes and the Himalayas Compared [and Comments and Reply]

    David Guillet;Ricardo A. Godoy;Christian E. Guksch;Jiro Kawakita

  • Physical growth and nutritional status of Tsimane' Amerindian children of lowland Bolivia.

    Z. Foster;E. Byron;V. Reyes-García;T. Huanca

  • Local financial benefits of rain forests. Comparative evidence from Amerindian societies in Bolivia and Honduras

    R Godoy;H Overman;J Demmer;L Apaza

  • Why People Eat Bushmeat: Results From Two-Choice, Taste Tests in Gabon, Central Africa

    Michelle Schenck;Ernestine Nsame Effa;Malcolm Starkey;David Wilkie

  • MINING: ANTHROPOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES

    Ricardo Godoy

  • Guidelines for the Economic Valuation of Nontimber Tropical-Forest Products

    Ricardo Godoy;Ruben Lubowski

  • A method for the economic valuation of non-timber tropical forest products

    Unknown

  • The effect of wealth and real income on wildlife consumption among native Amazonians in Bolivia: estimates of annual trends with longitudinal household data (2002–2006)

    R. Godoy;E. A. Undurraga;D. Wilkie;V. Reyes-García;V. Reyes-García

  • Ethnobotanical knowledge shared widely among Tsimane' Amerindians, Bolivia.

    V. Reyes-Garcia;R. Godoy;V. Vadez;L. Apaza

  • Does Integration to the Market Threaten Agricultural Diversity? Panel and Cross-Sectional Data From a Horticultural-Foraging Society in the Bolivian Amazon

    Vincent Vadez;Victoria Reyes-García;Ricardo A. Godoy;V. Lilian Apaza

  • Meat prices influence the consumption of wildlife by the Tsimane' Amerindians of Bolivia

    Lilian Apaza;David Wilkie;Elizabeth Byron;Tomás Huanca

  • First Impressions From Faces Among U.S. and Culturally Isolated Tsimane’ People in the Bolivian Rainforest:

    Leslie A. Zebrowitz;Ruoxue Wang;P. Matthew Bronstad;Dan Eisenberg

  • Influence of helminth infections on childhood nutritional status in lowland Bolivia.

    S. Tanner;William Leonard;Thomas McDade;V. Reyes-Garcia;V. Reyes-Garcia

  • Is Spanish-Only Schooling Responsible for the Puerto Rican Language Gap?

    Joshua Angrist;Joshua Angrist;Aimee Chin;Aimee Chin;Ricardo Godoy

  • Predictors of C-reactive protein in Tsimane' 2 to 15 year-olds in lowland Bolivia

    T.W. McDade;W.R. Leonard;J. Burhop;V. Reyes-García

Frequent Co-Authors

Victoria Reyes-García
Victoria Reyes-García Autonomous University of Barcelona
William R. Leonard
William R. Leonard Northwestern University
Tomás Huanca
Tomás Huanca Brandeis University
Vincent Vadez
Vincent Vadez Institut de Recherche pour le Développement
David Wilkie
David Wilkie Wildlife Conservation Society
Daniel Eisenberg
Daniel Eisenberg University of California, Los Angeles
Jere R. Behrman
Jere R. Behrman University of Pennsylvania
Nicholas Brokaw
Nicholas Brokaw University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online Social Sciences and Humanities degrees in the USA opens up flexible study options and diverse career opportunities. Many students pursue advanced credentials to boost their professional skills and meet growing industry demands.

Professionals interested in counseling or mental health often consider online psych d programs for their rigorous clinical focus. For those who wish to help families, there are accredited marriage and family therapy online programs accredited designed for faster completion and flexible study.

Cost is a significant consideration. Students searching for affordable postgraduate options can find a masters in psychology online cheap to help balance quality education and budget priorities.

Those aiming for advanced leadership or academic roles can also explore edd degrees, offered in accelerated, flexible formats online.

These programs make it easier to match your education choices with your personal interests, career goals, and financial needs—all from the comfort of your home.

Best Scientists Citing Ricardo Godoy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles