World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
61
Citations
14933
World Ranking
2170
National Ranking
253

Julia E. Fa publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia E. Fa sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 388 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Julia E. Fa D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia E. Fa sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julia E. Fa is affiliated with Manchester Metropolitan University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines within environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, presenting a significant contribution to these fields.

The main fields of study for Julia E. Fa include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Within these fields, they have specialized subfields of research interest such as:

  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Social Psychology

The primary topics addressed in their work focus on:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Amphibian and Reptile Biology

Julia E. Fa has published extensively in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • African Journal of Ecology
  • Journal of Arid Environments
  • Research Square
  • One Health
  • Scientific Reports

Their recent noteworthy publications are:

  • Importance of Indigenous Peoples' lands for the conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes, 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
  • Wild Meat Is Still on the Menu: Progress in Wild Meat Research, Policy, and Practice from 2002 to 2020, 2021, Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • Protecting 30% of the planet for nature: costs, benefits and economic implications, 2020, DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC))
  • Global importance of Indigenous Peoples, their lands, and knowledge systems for saving the world's primates from extinction, 2022, Science Advances
  • Indigenous Peoples' lands are threatened by industrial development; conversion risk assessment reveals need to support Indigenous stewardship, 2023, One Earth

In addition to articles, Julia E. Fa has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Cambridge University Press:

  • Hunting Wildlife in the Tropics and Subtropics, 2022

Throughout their research career, Julia E. Fa has collaborated frequently with colleagues in related scientific areas. Their prominent co-authors include:

  • Luca Luiselli
  • Stephan M. Funk
  • Daniele Dendi
  • Fabio Petrozzi
  • Guillermo Ros Brull

Best Publications

  • A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation

    Stephen T. Garnett;Neil D. Burgess;Neil D. Burgess;Julia E. Fa;Julia E. Fa;Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares

  • Bushmeat Exploitation in Tropical Forests: an Intercontinental Comparison

    John E. Fa;Carlos A. Peres;Jessica Meeuwig

  • Bushmeat and food security in the Congo Basin: linkages between wildlife and people's future

    John E. Fa;Dominic Currie;Jessica Meeuwig

  • Impacts of hunting on mammals in African tropical moist forests: a review and synthesis

    Julia E. Fa;David Brown

  • Importance of Indigenous peoples' lands for the conservation of intact forest landscapes

    Julia E Fa;Julia E Fa;James Em Watson;James Em Watson;Ian Leiper;Peter Potapov

  • Hunting vulnerability, ecological characteristics and harvest rates of bushmeat species in afrotropical forests

    John E. Fa;Sarah F. Ryan;Diana J. Bell

  • Biological diversity of Mexico: origins and distribution.

    T. P. Ramamoorthy;Robert. Bye;Antonio. Lot;John. Fa

  • Diversity and origins of the phanerogamic flora of Mexico.

    J. Rzedowski;T. P. Ramamoorthy;R. A. Bye;A. Lot

  • Getting to grips with the magnitude of exploitation: Bushmeat in the Cross–Sanaga rivers region, Nigeria and Cameroon

    John E. Fa;Sarah Seymour;Jef Dupain;Rajan Amin

  • Impact of Market Hunting on Mammal Species in Equatorial Guinea

    Julia E. Fa;Javier Juste;Jaime Perez Del Val;Javier Castroviejo

  • The genus Quercus in Mexico.

    K. C. Nixon;T.P. Ramamoorthy;R. Bye;A. Lot

  • Hunting for Consensus: Reconciling Bushmeat Harvest, Conservation, and Development Policy in West and Central Africa

    Elizabeth L. Bennett;Eric Blencowe;Katrina Brandon;David Brown

  • Priority research areas for ecosystem services in a changing world

    Emily Nicholson;Georgina M. Mace;Paul R. Armsworth;Giles Atkinson

  • Evolution and Ecology of Macaque Societies

    Robin I. M. Dunbar;John E. Fa;D.L. Lindburg

  • Recent loss of closed forests is associated with Ebola virus disease outbreaks

    Jesús Olivero;Julia E. Fa;Julia E. Fa;Raimundo Real;Ana L. Márquez

  • Bushmeat Markets on Bioko Island as a Measure of Hunting Pressure

    John E. Fa;Juan E. Garcia Yuste;Ramon Castelo

  • Data gaps and opportunities for comparative and conservation biology

    Dalia A Conde;Johanna Staerk;Johanna Staerk;Fernando Colchero;Rita da Silva

  • Bring the captive closer to the wild: redefining the role of ex situ conservation

    Diana J. Pritchard;John E. Fa;Sara Oldfield;Stuart R. Harrop

  • Global importance of Indigenous Peoples, their lands, and knowledge systems for saving the world’s primates from extinction

    Unknown

  • The biodiversity scenario of Mexico: a review of terrestrial habitats.

    V. M. Toledo;M. de J. Ordóñez;T. P. Ramamoorthy;R. A. Bye

  • The role of humans in the diversification of plants in Mexico.

    R. Bye;T. P. Ramamoorthy;R. A. Bye;A. Lot

  • Commercial bushmeat hunting in the Monte Mitra forests, Equatorial Guinea: extent and impact

    J. E. Fa;J. E. García Yuste

  • Body Size, Diet and Population Density in Afrotropical Forest Mammals: A Comparison with Neotropical Species

    John E. Fa;Andy Purvis

  • Genus Pinus: a Mexican purview.

    B. T. Styles;T.P. Ramamoorthy;R. Bye;A. Lot

  • market dynamics of bushmeat species in Equatorial Guinea

    J. Juste;J. E. Fa;J. Perez Del Val;J. Castroviejo

  • Ecology and behavior of food-enhanced primate groups

    John E. Fa;Charles H. Southwick

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Nasi
Robert Nasi Center for International Forestry Research
Raimundo Real
Raimundo Real University of Malaga
David W. Macdonald
David W. Macdonald University of Oxford
Paul J. Johnson
Paul J. Johnson University of Oxford
Javier Juste
Javier Juste Spanish National Research Council
James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland
Luca Luiselli
Luca Luiselli Institute for Development Ecology Conservation and Cooperation
Catherine J. Robinson
Catherine J. Robinson Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
James W. Vaupel
James W. Vaupel University of Southern Denmark
Kerstin K. Zander
Kerstin K. Zander Charles Darwin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and rewarding career options in the broader sciences and healthcare fields. Students interested in communication sciences may wish to consider asha accredited online slp programs, which ensure high educational standards and prepare graduates for licensure as speech-language pathologists.

For those with undergraduate degrees outside of speech-language pathology, slp bridge program options are available online to help you shift your academic focus and gain required prerequisites efficiently.

Another high-demand pathway in public health is nursing. If you already have a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, you might consider online accelerated bsn programs for non nurses to launch your nursing career quickly and flexibly. This can set a foundation for specialized roles such as psychiatric nursing.

Career outcomes and salaries in these fields often vary by location. For those interested in mental health care, review psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state to explore earnings potential across the US.

Best Scientists Citing Julia E. Fa

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles